bims-tyki2d Biomed News
on Thymidine kinase 2 deficiency
Issue of 2026–10–11
four papers selected by
Zoya Panahloo, UCB



  1. Yale J Biol Med. 2026 Jun;99(2): 259-262
      
    Keywords:  Gene Therapy; History of Medicine; Rare diseases
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.59249/RTAW1482
  2. Chronic Illn. 2026 Oct 09. 17423953261491392
      ObjectivesWe aimed to (1) understand barriers to quality healthcare and services in the context of rare diseases and (2) identify the multifaceted impacts of these barriers on rare disease patients.MethodsSemi-structured interviews exploring barriers to optimal rare disease care, the impacts of these barriers, empowerment strategies used, and recommendations. The Ten New Rules to Redesign and Improve Care Framework proposed by the Committee on Quality of Health Care in America of the US Institute of Medicine (2001) guided content analysis.ResultsTwelve individuals living with different rare diseases were interviewed. Numerous pertinent barriers were reported. For example, 'care based on continuous healing relationships' (rule 1) is impacted by very long delays in obtaining diagnoses. Patient abandonment and lack of follow-up are also experienced because of the perplexing nature of rare diseases. Regarding 'the patient as the source of control' (rule 3), the rationality of patients is questioned, including claims of malingering and misunderstandings about their unusual experiences. These barriers have multifaceted impacts such as strong negative affect and estrangement from mainstream healthcare.DiscussionThere is a clear and pressing need to improve the quality of care for people living with rare diseases, in alignment with major clinical recommendations.
    Keywords:  Rare diseases; ethics; patient preferences; qualitative research; quality of care
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1177/17423953261491392
  3. Arch Med Res. 2026 Oct 07. pii: S0188-4409(26)00140-2. [Epub ahead of print]57(8): 103518
      Rare diseases collectively affect between 3.5 and 5.9% of the global population. Yet, patients still endure an average diagnostic interval of five to seven years before receiving an accurate explanation of their condition. Approximately 80% of these disorders have a genetic origin, and nearly 95% lack approved disease-modifying therapies that alter the disease course. This combination places enormous pressure on healthcare systems and affected families. In the last decade, artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning, deep learning, and natural language processing, has emerged as a credible response to these gaps. This narrative review summarizes recent AI contributions across four interrelated dimensions: differential diagnosis and pattern recognition; prognosis and risk stratification; therapeutic discovery and drug repositioning; and the operational organization of rare disease care. Available evidence indicates that AI-based approaches can shorten diagnostic intervals, reduce unnecessary testing, and increase therapeutic options for orphan conditions. Despite these global advances, implementation remains highly unequal. This review foregrounds the Latin American perspective, setting itself apart from broader overviews. The region presents a scenario in which rich genetic diversity and growing collaborative networks coexist with infrastructural bottlenecks and underrepresentation in genomic databases. The integration of AI into rare disease care will depend on federated data infrastructures, transparent and interpretable models, harmonized regulatory frameworks, and sustained investment in workforce training. Patient organizations are essential partners, particularly in emerging economies.
    Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Diagnosis; Machine learning; Precision medicine; Rare diseases
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2026.103518