bims-tumhet 2023-06-04 papers

Issue of 2023–06–04
four papers selected by
Sergio Marchini, Humanitas Research

Target Oncol. 2023 Jun 03.

PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer: A Review.

David M O'Malley, Thomas C Krivak, Nashwa Kabil, Jiefen Munley, Kathleen N Moore.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) have transformed the ovarian cancer (OC) treatment landscape. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of data for the PARPis olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib in patients with OC and discusses their role in disease management, with a focus on the use of PARPis as maintenance therapy in the United States (US). Olaparib was the first PARPi to be approved as first-line maintenance monotherapy in the US, with maintenance niraparib subsequently approved in the first-line setting. Data also support the efficacy of rucaparib as first-line maintenance monotherapy. PARPi maintenance combination therapy (olaparib plus bevacizumab) also provides benefit in patients with newly diagnosed advanced OC whose tumors tested positive for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Biomarker testing is critical in the newly diagnosed setting to identify patients most likely to benefit from PARPi maintenance therapy and guide treatment decisions. Clinical trial data support the use of PARPis (olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib) as second-line or later maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed OC. Although distinct differences in tolerability profile were observed between PARPis, they were generally well tolerated, with the majority of adverse events managed by dose modification. PARPis had no detrimental effect on patients' health-related quality of life. Real-world data support the use of PARPis in OC, although some differences between PARPis are apparent. Data from trials investigating novel combination strategies, such as PARPis plus immune checkpoint inhibitors, are awaited with interest; the optimal sequencing of novel therapies in OC remains to be established.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-023-00970-w

Eur J Cancer. 2023 Apr 27. pii: S0959-8049(23)00219-8. [Epub ahead of print]188 131-139

PARP inhibitor predictive value of the Leuven HRD test compared with Myriad MyChoice CDx PLUS HRD on 468 ovarian cancer patients from the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial.

BACKGROUND: The PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial showed improved progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in homologous recombination deficient (HRD) positive patients treated with olaparib, but not when HRD negative (HRD tested with MyChoice CDx PLUS [Myriad test]).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The academic Leuven HRD test consists of capture-based targeted sequencing of genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms and coding exons of eight HR genes including BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53. We compared the predictive value of the Leuven HRD versus Myriad HRD test for PFS and OS in the randomised PAOLA-1 trial.
RESULTS: 468 patients had left-over DNA after Myriad testing for Leuven HRD testing. Positive/negative/overall percent agreement for the Leuven versus Myriad HRD status was 95%/86%/91%, respectively. Tumours were HRD+ in 55% and 52%, respectively. In Leuven HRD+ patients, 5years PFS (5yPFS) was 48.6% versus 20.3% (HR 0.431; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.312-0.595) for olaparib versus placebo, respectively (Myriad test 0.409; 95% CI 0.292-0.572). In Leuven HRD+/BRCAwt patients 5yPFS was 41.3% versus 12.6% (HR 0.497; 95% CI 0.316-0.783), and 43.6% versus 13.3% (HR 0.435; 95% CI 0.261-0.727) for the Myriad test. 5yOS was prolonged in the HRD+ subgroup with both tests 67.2% versus 54.4% (HR 0.663; 95% CI 0.442-0.995) for the Leuven test, and 68.0% versus 51.8% (HR 0.596 95% CI 0.393-0.904) for the Myriad test. HRD status was undetermined in 10.7% and 9.4% of the samples, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A robust correlation between the Leuven HRD and Myriad test was observed. For HRD+ tumours, the academic Leuven HRD showed a similar difference in PFS and OS as the Myriad test.

Keywords: HRD testing; Leuven HRD test; Ovarian cancer; PARP inhibitors; Targeted therapy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2023.04.020

Nat Rev Genet. 2023 May 31.

Transitioning single-cell genomics into the clinic.

Jennifer Lim, Venessa Chin, Kirsten Fairfax, Catia Moutinho, Dan Suan, Hanlee Ji, Joseph E Powell.

The use of genomics is firmly established in clinical practice, resulting in innovations across a wide range of disciplines such as genetic screening, rare disease diagnosis and molecularly guided therapy choice. This new field of genomic medicine has led to improvements in patient outcomes. However, most clinical applications of genomics rely on information generated from bulk approaches, which do not directly capture the genomic variation that underlies cellular heterogeneity. With the advent of single-cell technologies, research is rapidly uncovering how genomic data at cellular resolution can be used to understand disease pathology and mechanisms. Both DNA-based and RNA-based single-cell technologies have the potential to improve existing clinical applications and open new application spaces for genomics in clinical practice, with oncology, immunology and haematology poised for initial adoption. However, challenges in translating cellular genomics from research to a clinical setting must first be overcome.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-023-00613-w

Mod Pathol. 2023 May 31. pii: S0893-3952(23)00139-4. [Epub ahead of print] 100234

The Significance of FIGO Grading in Microsatellite Instability-High and POLE-Mutant Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma.

Elizabeth Kertowidjojo, Amir Momeni-Boroujeni, Eric Rios-Doria, Nadeem Abu-Rustum, Robert A Soslow.

With the advancement of diagnostic molecular technology and the molecular classification of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC), it remains to be seen whether conventional International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grading retains clinical significance in certain molecular subtypes of EECs. In this study, we explored the clinical significance of FIGO grade in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and POLE-mutant EECs. A total of 162 cases of MSI-H EECs and 50 cases of POLE-mutant EECs were included in the analysis. Significant differences in tumor mutation burden (TMB), progression-free survival, and disease-specific survival were seen between the MSI-H and POLE-mutant cohorts. Within the MSI-H cohort, there were statistically significant differences in TMB and stage at presentation across FIGO grades, but not survival. Within the POLE-mutant cohort, there was significantly greater TMB with increasing FIGO grade, but there were no significant differences in stage or survival. In both the MSI-H and POLE-mutant cohorts, log-rank survival analysis showed no statistically significant difference in progression-free survival and disease-specific survival across FIGO grades. Similar findings were also seen when a binary grading system was utilized. Since FIGO grade was not associated with survival, we conclude that the intrinsic biology of these tumors, characterized by their molecular profile, may override the significance of FIGO grading.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100234