Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Sep 17.
Lei Ji,
Xi Chen,
Hongwei Lyu,
Ge Song,
Min Xiao,
Qing Li,
Jiayu Wang,
Ying Fan,
Yang Luo,
Qiao Li,
Shanshan Chen,
Fei Ma,
Binghe Xu,
Pin Zhang.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies often combined double hormone receptor-positive (dHR +) and single HR-positive (sHR +) tumors, thus not accounting for the distinct characteristics of sHR + , particularly in the neoadjuvant setting. Moreover, adding immunotherapy to cytotoxic chemotherapy has shown encouraging efficacy in certain HR-positive early breast cancers. This study sought to assess pathological complete response (pCR) and survival outcomes in sHR + /HER2- breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while also investigating its specific biological traits and immune profile.
METHODS: Clinical data were sourced from the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CHCAMS, n = 1049), and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, n = 21,092) database to examine neoadjuvant chemosensitivity and survival outcomes. Additionally, clinicopathological and subtype data from CHCAMS, SEER, the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC, n = 1052), and Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC, n = 570) were analyzed to identify biological features that correlate with pCR rates and prognosis in sHR + /HER2- breast cancer. Further genomic and transcriptomic data from METABRIC, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, n = 741), and MSK-IMPCAT (n = 1535) were reviewed to uncover their potential links with endocrine and immunotherapy responses.
RESULTS: In comparison to dHR + (ER + and PR +)/HER2- breast cancer, sHR + (ER + /PR- or ER-/PR +)/HER2- breast cancer displayed a higher pCR rate (20.2% vs. 3.2%, P < 0.001), but considerably worse survival (hazard ratio, 2.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.62-5.43, P < 0.001) within the CHCAMS neoadjuvant cohort. Clinically, sHR + /HER2- tumors were associated with higher histological grades and proliferation rates compared to dHR + /HER2- tumors, along with a greater rate of HR-low positivity (50.9% vs. 3.0%, P < 0.001) in primary tumors and a tendency to transition to triple-negative tumors in residual disease (42.7% vs. 1.8%, P < 0.001). Furthermore, sHR + /HER2- breast cancers demonstrated lower endocrine sensitivity scores, with about 20% classified as PAM50-defined basal-like subtype. Immunologically, sHR + /HER2- tumors had elevated tumor mutation burden (TMB), higher expression of immune checkpoint genes (e.g., PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA4), and greater infiltration by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), particularly CD8 + T cells, than dHR + /HER2- tumors.
CONCLUSION: Compared to dHR + /HER2- breast cancer, sHR + /HER2- cases showed a relative sensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy but poorer prognosis. The immune-activated phenotype of sHR + /HER2- breast cancer indicates that it may benefit from immunotherapy approaches, but these findings warrant validation in prospective studies.
Keywords: Early breast cancer; Hormone receptor-positive breast cancer; Immunotherapy; Neoadjuvant treatment