Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 Sep 19. pii: S2666-6367(21)01227-6. [Epub ahead of print]
Jan Philipp Bewersdorf,
Cecily Allen,
Abu-Sayeef Mirza,
Alyssa A Grimshaw,
Smith Giri,
Nikolai A Podoltsev,
Lohith Gowda,
Christina Cho,
Martin S Tallman,
Amer M Zeidan,
Maximilian Stahl.
BACKGROUND: Disease relapse remains the major cause of death among patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who receive an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT). Maintenance treatment with FLT3 inhibitors and hypomethylating agents (HMA) has been studied in various clinical trials with mixed results.
OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the current evidence on the efficacy and safety of FLT3 inhibitors and HMA for maintenance therapy following allo-HCT in AML and MDS.
METHODS: For this systematic review and meta-analysis Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched from inception to March 2021 for studies on maintenance therapies following allo-HCT in AML and MDS. Studies were excluded if they were reviews, commentaries, case series with <5 patients, or basic research articles, not published in English, not on post-allo-HCT maintenance with FLT3 inhibitors or HMA in AML or MDS, or if they were clinical trials without published results or duplicate publications from the same patient cohort. Studies with insufficient reporting of the primary endpoint (2-year overall survival [OS]) and studies using FLT3 inhibitors or HMA for pre-emptive treatment of imminent relapse based on positive measurable residual disease testing were excluded. Random-effects models were used to pool response rates for the primary outcome of 2-year OS. Hazard ratios (HR) for death and relapse were calculated for studies that included a control group. Rates of relapse-free survival (RFS), non-relapse mortality and acute and chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) were studied as secondary endpoints. Downs and Black checklist and risk of bias assessments were used to gauge the quality of individual studies. The study protocol has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020187298).
RESULTS: Our search strategy identified 5559 studies. Twenty-one studies with a total of 809 patients were included in the meta-analysis. 2-year OS rates were 81.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73.8-87.7%) and 65.7% (95% CI: 55.1-74.9%) among patients treated with FLT3 inhibitors and HMA, respectively. In sensitivity analyses restricted to studies that included a control group, maintenance therapy with FLT3 inhibitors (HR for death: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.26-0.62) or HMA (HR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.31-0.66) appeared superior to no maintenance therapy. 2-year RFS rates were 79.8% (95% CI: 75.0-83.9%) and 62.4% (95% CI: 50.6-72.9%) among patients treated with FLT3 inhibitors and HMA, respectively. Rates of any grade acute and chronic GVHD were 33.1% (95% CI: 25.4-41.8%; grade 3/4: 16.5%) and 42.5% (95% CI: 26.3-60.4%) among FLT3 inhibitor and 42.7% (95% CI: 33.5-52.4%; grade 3/4: 8.1%) and 41.5% (95% CI: 32.0-51.6%) among HMA-treated patients, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Maintenance therapy with either FLT3 inhibitors or HMA following allo-HCT, can lead to prolonged and improved OS and RFS with a favorable safety profile. Additional studies are needed to define the optimal duration of treatment, the role of measurable residual disease status, and transplant characteristics in patient selection.
Keywords: AML; Acute myeloid leukemia; Hypomethylating agent; Maintenance therapy; Sorafenib; Transplant