bims-skolko Biomed News
on Scholarly communication
Issue of 2025–01–19
forty-two papers selected by
Thomas Krichel, Open Library Society
  1. A proposal for reference list format in medical journals: Considering the last author's name.
  2. Evaluation and Comparison of the Academic Quality of Open-Access Mega Journals and Authoritative Journals: Disruptive Innovation Evaluation.
  3. Auditory research across time: Insights from an interdisciplinary publishing platform.
  4. New challenges ahead in scientific publishing.
  5. Historiography of Scientific Publishing across Cultures and Disciplines.
  6. Ethics: The Elixir of Publications.
  7. Seniority, authorship order, and severity of punishment in research misconduct - shared/honorary authorships as explanations for an apparent paradox.
  8. Geographical Disparities in Research Misconduct: Analyzing Retraction Patterns by Country.
  9. Plagiarism in Publications: All about Being Fair!
  10. Retractions caused by honest mistakes are extremely stressful, say researchers.
  11. Academic writing: Key components, structure, and avoiding plagiarism.
  12. Reasons for retraction of clinical research articles in PubMed indexed medical journals from 2012 to 2022.
  13. Predatory Journals: "The Gray Market" of Academic Publishing.
  14. How To Cope With Predatory Journals.
  15. AI-generated responses in peer review pose a growing challenge for reviewers and editors: Call for a reviewer rating system.
  16. Reviewing manuscripts for scientific journals: recommendations for early career scientists.
  17. Valuing contributions to peer review: A shared responsibility.
  18. Peer Review of an Article: Tips, Tricks, and Troubleshooting.
  19. Response: Comparing letters written by humans and ChatGPT: A preliminary study.
  20. Artificial intelligence in writing manuscripts: Concerns about hindering human primitive feeling.
  21. Guidance needed for using artificial intelligence to screen journal submissions for misconduct.
  22. Regulation for ChatGPT use in paper writing.
  23. Editors' role in shaping the publishing environment and guiding authors in the era of artificial intelligence.
  24. Ethics of Writing Personal Statements and Letters of Recommendations with Large Language Models.
  25. Navigating Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Manuscript Writing: Tips and Traps.
  26. Use of AI in Family Medicine Publications: A Joint Editorial From Journal Editors.
  27. Building the Capacity of Young Professionals in Family Planning to Publish: Insights from the ICFP2022 WHO Scientific Writing, Mentoring and Coaching Course.
  28. Mastering the Art of First Impressions: Tips to Write a Title, Abstract, and Keywords for a Medical Manuscript.
  29. Manuscript Writing for Dummies: Like Sands Through the Hourglass.
  30. Writing the Discussion in a Research Paper.
  31. Turning Your Presentations/Posters to Publications.
  32. Writing for Clarity: A Concise Guide for Scientific Writing and Tips for Selecting a Journal.
  33. Medical researchers' perception of sharing of metadata from case report forms.
  34. Indexing of Journals and Indices of Publications.
  35. Insights into Radiology Publications.
  36. Navigating the Editorial Gauntlet for Excellence in Radiology Publishing.
  37. Approach to Publishing a Scientific (Radiology) Book.
  38. The J ournal of P erinatal M edicine is switching its publication model to open access.
  39. MDCP the First 10 Years Bygone-New Editors' Note to the Readership.
  40. I had a dream.
  41. Editorial: new Editor-in-Chief and the 360th anniversary of Philosophical Transactions.
  42. A year in review - evaluating the launch of IJTLD OPEN.
  1. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jan;pii: S1028-4559(24)00307-3. [Epub ahead of print]64(1): 191-192
    A proposal for reference list format in medical journals: Considering the last author's name.
    Shigeki Matsubara, Daisuke Matsubara.
      
    Keywords:  Author; Citation; Last author; Reference; Reference list
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2024.08.009
  2. J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 15. 27 e59598
    Evaluation and Comparison of the Academic Quality of Open-Access Mega Journals and Authoritative Journals: Disruptive Innovation Evaluation.
    Yuyan Jiang, Xue-Li Liu, Liyun Wang.
       BACKGROUND: Some scholars who are skeptical about open-access mega journals (OAMJs) have argued that low-quality papers are often difficult to publish in more prestigious and authoritative journals, and OAMJs may be their main destination.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the academic quality of OAMJs and highlight their important role in clinical medicine. To achieve this aim, authoritative journals and representative OAMJs in this field were selected as research objects. The differences between the two were compared and analyzed in terms of their level of disruptive innovation. Additionally, this paper explored the countries and research directions for which OAMJs serve as publication channels for disruptive innovations.
    METHODS: In this study, the journal information, literature data, and open citation relationship data were sourced from Journal Citation Reports (JCR), Web of Science (WoS), InCites, and the OpenCitations Index of PubMed Open PMID-to-PMID citations (POCI). Then, we calculated the disruptive innovation level of the focus paper based on the local POCI database.
    RESULTS: The mean Journal Disruption Index (JDI) values for the selected authoritative journals and OAMJs were 0.5866 (SD 0.26933) and 0.0255 (SD 0.01689), respectively, showing a significant difference. Only 1.48% (861/58,181) of the OAMJ papers reached the median level of disruptive innovation of authoritative journal papers (MDAJ). However, the absolute number was roughly equal to that of authoritative journals. OAMJs surpassed authoritative journals in publishing innovative papers in 24 research directions (eg, Allergy), accounting for 40.68% of all research directions in clinical medicine. Among research topics with at least 10 authoritative papers, OAMJs matched or exceeded MDAJ in 35.71% of cases. The number of papers published in authoritative journals and the average level of disruptive innovation in each country showed a linear relationship after logarithmic treatment, with a correlation coefficient of -0.891 (P<.001). However, the number of papers published in OAMJs in each country and the average level of disruptive innovation did not show a linear relationship after logarithmic treatment.
    CONCLUSIONS: While the average disruptive innovation level of papers published by OAMJs is significantly lower than that of authoritative journals, OAMJs have become an important publication channel for innovative research in various research directions. They also provide fairer opportunities for the publication of innovative results from limited-income countries. Therefore, the academic community should recognize the contribution and value of OAMJs to advancing scientific research.
    Keywords:  disruption index; innovative evaluation; open citation data; open-access mega journals; paper evaluation
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2196/59598
  3. Brain Res. 2025 Jan 11. pii: S0006-8993(25)00011-3. [Epub ahead of print] 149453
    Auditory research across time: Insights from an interdisciplinary publishing platform.
    Andréanne Sharp.
      
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149453
  4. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2025 Jan 10. pii: S0001-37652024000600101. [Epub ahead of print]96(4): e2024964
    New challenges ahead in scientific publishing.
    Alexander W A Kellner.
      
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-37652024964
  5. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan;35(Suppl 1): S2-S8
    Historiography of Scientific Publishing across Cultures and Disciplines.
    Bharat Hosur, Manjul Tripathi, Sameer Vyas, Sikandar Shaikh, Chirag K Ahuja.
      Historiography is a vital perspective of our scientific literature that charts the evolution of scientific publishing, from its early origins to the present status. The key transformations including the shift from a limited self-published legacy to specialized and professional peer-reviewed journals, the impact of technological advancements, and the emergence of new profitable business models are learning points for the future course and couture. Science is pursued and persevered by real humans in social and cultural contexts and not in isolation of laboratories or clinics. Survival of the impartial pure scientific bent of mind and its translation into tangible works has not been easy through the turmoil of various forms of force majeure. The lack of gender parity and even its divergence in some ways was palpable in the discourse of scientific research. Despite that, when provided with a common platform with comparable impact factors and rates of publications, gender inequality seems to vanish and equivalence in academia is discernible. The roles of authors, publishers, and readers have also evolved chronologically, adapting to the influence of cultural and disciplinary factors through the ages. The challenges of predatory publishing, open access, plagiarism, and data capitalization are also growing alongside. Ultimately, understanding the historical context and persistence of the predecessors in the course of scientific publishing can enhance modern scientific research and communication.
    Keywords:  digital publishing; open access; peer review; revolution; scholarly communication; scientific publication; scientist
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1800865
  6. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan;35(Suppl 1): S30-S35
    Ethics: The Elixir of Publications.
    Manphool Singhal, Suprit Basu, Arun Sharma, Paramjeet Singh.
      Scientific papers are the driving force for research, information dissemination, and policymaking that directly impacts society. Thus, ethical practices are the elixir of publications. Adherence to ethical practices promotes integrity in research and publication. Transgression of ethics is thus considered a poison to science. Although there is no definition of ethics, it includes a systematic approach that not only recommends but also defends and protects concepts of the conduct of right and wrong. Therefore, ethical principles should be strictly adhered to and upheld at any cost for the progression of science. This article addresses various actions that are considered ethical misconduct and guidelines to fix them. Recommendations of various organizations related to the ethics in publications are also discussed.
    Keywords:  authorship; conflict of interests; ethics; publications
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791671
  7. Account Res. 2025 Jan 16. 1-3
    Seniority, authorship order, and severity of punishment in research misconduct - shared/honorary authorships as explanations for an apparent paradox.
    Bor Luen Tang.
      
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2025.2453851
  8. J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 14. 27 e65775
    Geographical Disparities in Research Misconduct: Analyzing Retraction Patterns by Country.
    Paul Sebo, Melissa Sebo.
      This study examines disparities in research retractions due to misconduct, identifying countries with the highest retraction counts and those disproportionately represented relative to population and publication output. The findings emphasize the need for improved research integrity measures.
    Keywords:  affiliation; country; ethical standards; ethics; fraud; integrity; literature; misconduct; plagiarism; publication; research; research misconduct; retraction
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2196/65775
  9. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan;35(Suppl 1): S36-S45
    Plagiarism in Publications: All about Being Fair!
    Neeraj Lalwani.
      Upholding the highest standards of publication ethics is critical for ensuring the integrity of scholarly work, maintaining public trust, and advancing knowledge responsibly in academia. Plagiarism, defined as intellectual theft, is a significant ethical issue that undermines these principles. There are many forms of plagiarism, including direct, self, mosaic, and accidental plagiarism. Plagiarism is prevalent across the globe, but the problem is worse in developing countries due to numerous factors, such as social and economic conditions and lack of knowledge. The digital age has further exacerbated the situation, as easy access to artificial intelligence and online content facilitates plagiarism. To combat this problem, it is essential to recognize the importance of originality and the consequences of plagiarism, including damage to one's professional reputation, legal repercussions, and loss of credibility and trust. Educational institutions and publishers can play a crucial role in promoting a culture of fairness by implementing clear guidelines, providing training on ethical research practices, and enforcing strict consequences for violations. By encouraging an environment that values honesty, transparency, and respect for intellectual property, the academic community can uphold high ethical standards and contribute to the evolution of knowledge with integrity.
    Keywords:  academic integrity; citation practices; ethical standards; originality; plagiarism
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791745
  10. Nature. 2025 Jan 14.
    Retractions caused by honest mistakes are extremely stressful, say researchers.
    Gemma Conroy.
      
    Keywords:  Ethics; Policy; Publishing
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-00026-1
  11. J Perioper Pract. 2025 Jan 17. 17504589241310405
    Academic writing: Key components, structure, and avoiding plagiarism.
    Carolina Britton.
      This article aims to provide perioperative practitioners with an overview of the fundamentals of academic writing in undertaking academic work, conducting research or producing evidence-based essays in their professional activity (such as to support business cases, innovation or improvement work). It focuses on the key components and the structure of a piece of academic quality, on the review of the literature and on the fundamentals of avoiding plagiarism.
    Keywords:  Continuing professional development; evidence-based practice; reflective practice
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589241310405
  12. Indian J Med Ethics. 2024 Oct-Dec;IX(4):IX(4): 296-300
    Reasons for retraction of clinical research articles in PubMed indexed medical journals from 2012 to 2022.
    Miteshkumar Maurya, Renuka Munshi.
       BACKGROUND: Misconduct in the publication of research articles is a serious concern for the scientific community. This study was conducted with the objective to assess various reasons for retraction of clinical research articles published in PubMed indexed journals from all over the world since 2012 to 2022.
    METHODS: A search was performed on the PubMed database for retracted research articles using filters for "retracted publication". A total of 314 eligible research articles were assessed for studying basic details. The study outcome measures were to evaluate the reasons for the retraction and authors' and journal editors' responses to retractions.
    RESULTS: Of the original research articles retracted, 150/242 (61.98%) were clinical trial publications. Of the total 314 retracted research articles, the most retractions were in 2014 (47, 14.96%) and 2013 (40, 12.73%) while the fewest retractions were in 2012 (3, 0.95%) and 2022 (9, 2.86%). The most common reasons for retraction were data errors or data analysis errors (120/314, 38.21%) followed by plagiarism (37/314, 11.8%), duplicate publication (35/314, 11.1%), ethical concerns (23/314, 7.3%) and methodological flaws (22/314, 7%). These concerns were raised mainly by the editor or editor-in-chief (228/314, 72.61%), followed by authors (29/314, 9.23%). Out of 228 editorial concerns on publications, authors of only 91/228 (39.91%) agreed and 17/228 (7.45%) completely disagreed with the editorial decision.
    CONCLUSION: Authors need to be more careful about data analysis errors, fabricated or falsified data, and plagiarism while submitting their research papers. On the part of editors, detecting misconduct at the submission and peer review stages will help lower the retraction rate and avoid citation of such articles by other authors.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2024.067
  13. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan;35(Suppl 1): S114-S115
    Predatory Journals: "The Gray Market" of Academic Publishing.
    Abha Verma, Jiten Kumar, N Khandelwal.
      
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1792037
  14. J Korean Med Sci. 2025 Jan 13. 40(2): e78
    How To Cope With Predatory Journals.
    Jin-Hong Yoo.
      At the November 2024 regular meeting of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), predatory journals emerged as a major agenda item. Earlier, in August 2024, the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Journal Editors (APAME) held in Sydney also issued a statement addressing predatory journals. The issue of predatory journals is becoming increasingly serious. In line with the ICMJE's declaration, this review discusses predatory journals in general, suggests how researchers, journal publishers, and editors should address them, and presents an outlook for the future.
    Keywords:  Predatory Journals
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e78
  15. J Clin Neurosci. 2025 Jan 10. pii: S0967-5868(25)00014-1. [Epub ahead of print]133 111042
    AI-generated responses in peer review pose a growing challenge for reviewers and editors: Call for a reviewer rating system.
    Majovsky Martin.
      
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111042
  16. BMC Res Notes. 2025 Jan 16. 18(1): 17
    Reviewing manuscripts for scientific journals: recommendations for early career scientists.
    Diego A Forero, Stephen J Glatt, Marilyn H Oermann.
      Publication of articles in international scientific journals has been one of the main strategies for the communication of scientific findings and ideas. Prepublication peer review is a fundamental aspect of the publishing process in indexed scientific journals and, associated with the large growth in journals and articles, there has been a recent challenge in having adequate peer reviewers for international journals. In this article, we provide a short overview of the publishing process, give recommendations to early career researchers about writing peer reviews of adequate quality, and discuss some possibilities for the future.
    Keywords:  Health sciences; Life sciences; Peer review; Scientific publishing
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-07060-8
  17. J Spinal Cord Med. 2025 Jan;48(1): 1-2
    Valuing contributions to peer review: A shared responsibility.
    Carolann Murphy, Florian P Thomas.
      
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2441085
  18. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan;35(Suppl 1): S110-S113
    Peer Review of an Article: Tips, Tricks, and Troubleshooting.
    Rengarajan Rajagopal, Binit Sureka.
      Scientific publications are rapidly increasing in number, placing growing pressure on academics to publish. This study highlights the important tips and tricks for the authors in the context of reviewers' feedback and how to manage the article till the final stage of publication.
    Keywords:  editor; manuscript; reviewer
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1793916
  19. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jan 17.
    Response: Comparing letters written by humans and ChatGPT: A preliminary study.
    Shigeki Matsubara.
      
    Keywords:  artificial intelligence; journal; letter; manuscript; regulation
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16167
  20. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jan;pii: S1028-4559(24)00308-5. [Epub ahead of print]64(1): 193-194
    Artificial intelligence in writing manuscripts: Concerns about hindering human primitive feeling.
    Shigeki Matsubara.
      
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2024.08.010
  21. Res Ethics. 2025 Jan;21(1): 1-8
    Guidance needed for using artificial intelligence to screen journal submissions for misconduct.
    Mohammad Hosseini, David B Resnik.
      Journals and publishers are increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI) to screen submissions for potential misconduct, including plagiarism and data or image manipulation. While using AI can enhance the integrity of published manuscripts, it can also increase the risk of false/unsubstantiated allegations. Ambiguities related to journals' and publishers' responsibilities concerning fairness and transparency also raise ethical concerns. In this Topic Piece, we offer the following guidance: (1) All cases of suspected misconduct identified by AI tools should be carefully reviewed by humans to verify accuracy and ensure accountability; (2) Journals/publishers that use AI tools to detect misconduct should use only well-tested and reliable tools, remain vigilant concerning forms of misconduct that cannot be detected by these tools, and stay abreast of advancements in technology; (3) Journals/publishers should inform authors about irregularities identified by AI tools and give them a chance to respond before forwarding allegations to their institutions in accordance with Committee on Publication Ethics guidelines; (4) Journals/publishers that use AI tools to detect misconduct should screen all relevant submissions and not just random/purposefully selected submissions; and (5) Journals should inform authors about their definition of misconduct, their use of AI tools to detect misconduct, and their policies and procedures for responding to suspected cases of misconduct.
    Keywords:  Publication ethics; artificial intelligence; policy; research misconduct; transparency
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161241254052
  22. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jan;pii: S1028-4559(24)00310-3. [Epub ahead of print]64(1): 197-198
    Regulation for ChatGPT use in paper writing.
    Shigeki Matsubara.
      
    Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; ChatGPT; Paper; Regulation; Writing
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2024.07.023
  23. Croat Med J. 2024 Dec 30. 65(6): 471-472
    Editors' role in shaping the publishing environment and guiding authors in the era of artificial intelligence.
    Hrvoje Barić, Lea Škorić, Svjetlana Kalanj Bognar.
      
  24. ATS Sch. 2024 Dec;5(4): 486-491
    Ethics of Writing Personal Statements and Letters of Recommendations with Large Language Models.
    Logan Hostetter, Diana Kelm, Darlene Nelson.
      Large language models are becoming ubiquitous in the editing and generation of written content and are actively being explored for their use in medical education. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) engines to generate content in academic spaces is controversial and has been meet with swift responses and guidance from academic journals and publishers regarding the appropriate use or disclosure of use of AI engines in professional writing. To date, there is no guidance to applicants of graduate medical education programs in using AI engines to generate application content-primarily personal statements and letters of recommendation. In this Perspective, we review perceptions of using AI to generate application content, considerations for the impact of AI in holistic application review, ethical challenges regarding plagiarism, and AI text classifiers. Finally, included are recommendations to the graduate medical education community to provide guidance on use of AI engines in applications to maintain the integrity of the application process in graduate medical education.
    Keywords:  artificial intelligence; graduate medical education
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0038PS
  25. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan;35(Suppl 1): S178-S186
    Navigating Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Manuscript Writing: Tips and Traps.
    Ishan Kumar, Nidhi Yadav, Ashish Verma.
      It is being increasingly recognized that the strategic use of artificial intelligence (AI) can catalyze the process of manuscript writing. However, it is imperative that we recognize the hidden biases, pitfalls, and disadvantages of relying solely on AI, such as accuracy concerns and the potential erosion of nuanced human insight. With an emphasis on crafting effective prompts and inputs, this article reveals how to navigate the labyrinth of AI capabilities to create a good-quality manuscript. It also addresses the evolving guidelines from various publishers, shedding light on how to "leverage the digital genie" responsibly and ethically. We further explore how and which AI tools can be harnessed for literature reviews, executing statistical analyses, and polishing the language of the manuscript. Providing practical strategies for maximizing AI's benefits, this article underscores the indispensable value of human creativity and critical thinking, stressing that while AI can "streamline the mundane," the author's insight remains vital for profound intellectual contributions.
    Keywords:  artificial intelligence; generative AI; large language model; manuscript; scientific manuscript
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1800801
  26. Fam Pract Manag. 2025 Jan;32(1): 6-9
    Use of AI in Family Medicine Publications: A Joint Editorial From Journal Editors.
    Sarina Schrager, Dean A Seehusen, Sumi Sexton, Caroline Richardson, Jon Neher, Nicholas J Pimlott, Marjorie A Bowman, José Rodríguez, Christopher P Morley, L I Li, James Domdera.
      
  27. Contraception. 2025 Jan 08. pii: S0010-7824(25)00001-0. [Epub ahead of print] 110810
    Building the Capacity of Young Professionals in Family Planning to Publish: Insights from the ICFP2022 WHO Scientific Writing, Mentoring and Coaching Course.
    Jane E Hirst, Raqibat Idris, Jean Christoph Rusatira, Kellie Welborn, Jordan Freeman, Fionna Poon, James Kiarie, Rita Kabra.
       OBJECTIVES: We describe the development, delivery, and evaluation of a program to support junior professionals to publish their work in a scientific journal.
    STUDY DESIGN: Conference delegates with an accepted abstract at the International Conference on Family Planning (ICFP), self-identifying as junior professionals and from a low- or middle-income country (LMIC) or working predominantly in LMIC settings, were eligible for the program. The program involved: (i) Four face-to-face workshops at ICFP from the 14th to 17th of November 2022; (ii) mentoring meetings at ICFP; (iii) a six-month post-conference online coaching program; and (iv) post-conference learning webinars from December 2022 to May 2023. We used online surveys to assess the participants' reactions, learning, and behavior changes to the workshops and the online coaching program. We present participants' self-reported progress towards achieving a scientific publication.
    RESULTS: Sixty-seven participants from 29 countries participated in the workshops, and 40 attended the post-conference program. Workshops were rated positively, though the in-conference mentoring program faced challenges, including low attendance. The post-conference program was highly rated, with most participants engaging well with coaching and the webinars. At the end of the six-month program, 31 (46%) participants reported some progress in manuscript writing, with five completed manuscripts submitted.
    CONCLUSIONS: Scientific writing is a complex skill, and whilst our program had several positive elements, our participants faced many challenges completing their manuscripts within six months. The post-conference coaching and webinar program was rated highly, emphasizing the need for ongoing support. Future programs should address this and other difficulties we highlight.
    Keywords:  Capacity Development; Contraception; Low- and Middle-Income Countries; Medical Education; Scientific Writing
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110810
  28. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan;35(Suppl 1): S53-S57
    Mastering the Art of First Impressions: Tips to Write a Title, Abstract, and Keywords for a Medical Manuscript.
    Kurian C Eapen, Kirti Anna Koikkara, Shyamkumar Nidugala Keshava.
      Formulating the title and abstract of a manuscript is crucial to convey the essence of the research paper to the reader at a superficial glance. The title should be short and crisp, yet it should define critical information about the paper, such as the disease highlighted, any intervention studied, or the primary outcome. A structured abstract is required in most journals for an original research article, conveying a summary of the research. The keywords used in the title and abstract also play a vital role in the article's discoverability on various search engines, thereby increasing the overall reach and impact of the article. In this article, we highlight a few key points to consider while drafting the title and abstract of a medical manuscript.
    Keywords:  abstract; article; journal; keyword; manuscript; research; title
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1792039
  29. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2025 Jan 17.
    Manuscript Writing for Dummies: Like Sands Through the Hourglass.
    W Larry Kenney.
      
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00842.2024
  30. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan;35(Suppl 1): S93-S94
    Writing the Discussion in a Research Paper.
    Ravi Ramakantan.
      This study describes the dos and don'ts of writing the discussion in research papers.
    Keywords:  discussion; highlights; writing
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1790510
  31. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan;35(Suppl 1): S143-S147
    Turning Your Presentations/Posters to Publications.
    Shweta Prasad, Ajay Garg, Jitender Saini.
      A scientific manuscript or paper is invariably the ultimate goal of most scientific endeavors and in a majority of cases, the final manuscript often begins as an abstract submitted to a conference to be presented as either a poster or an oral presentation. It is practically possible for authors to use a conference presentation as a basic template to expand and write a complete manuscript. However, it is imperative for authors to acknowledge the limitations of these abstracts and make attempts to improve the quality of work before embarking on writing a full-length manuscript. This article aims to provide a structured approach to how to write a paper primarily based on a conference abstract, along with examples and limitations.
    Keywords:  abstracts; manuscripts; publications
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1800864
  32. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan;35(Suppl 1): S49-S52
    Writing for Clarity: A Concise Guide for Scientific Writing and Tips for Selecting a Journal.
    Thittayil Suresh Apoorv.
      Scientific writing is very important for writing research articles or commentaries. This article provides practical tips for researchers and clinicians to write well. Empowered researchers would be able to disseminate their research findings, help change the clinical practice, and advance public health.
    Keywords:  manuscript writing; scientific writing; writing tips
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1800802
  33. Learn Health Syst. 2025 Jan;9(1): e10456
    Medical researchers' perception of sharing of metadata from case report forms.
    Alexandra Meidt, Carolin Walter, Christoph U Lehmann, Martin Dugas.
       Introduction: Publishing medical metadata stored in case report forms (CRFs) is a prerequisite for the development of a learning health system (LHS) by fostering reuse of metadata and standardization in health research. The aim of our study was to investigate medical researchers' (MRs) willingness to share CRFs, to identify reasons for and against CRF sharing, and to determine if and under which conditions MRs might consider sharing CRF metadata via a public registry.
    Methods: We examined CRF data sharing commitments for 1842 interventional trials registered on the German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS) from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021. We invited 1360 individuals registered as contacts on DRKS to participate in a web-based survey between May 10, 2022, and June 30, 2022.
    Results: Only 0.3% (5/1842) of data sharing commitments in DRKS included a plan to share blank CRFs. Survey results showed high support for CRF sharing. More than 70% of respondents (223/301) were willing to share their CRFs, and 83.7% (252/301) were interested in CRF reuse. The most frequently reported reason for CRF sharing was improvement of comparability and interpretability of patient data (244/301; 81.0%). The most frequently reported reason against CRF sharing was missing approval by the sponsor (160/301; 53.2%). Researchers conducting commercial trials were significantly less likely to share CRFs than those conducting noncommercial trials (63.3% vs. 76.2%, OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32-0.92) and they were less likely to reuse CRFs (78.5% vs. 84.6%, OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.35-1.24). The most frequently mentioned prerequisite for publication of CRFs in a public registry was its trustworthiness (244/301, 81.1%).
    Conclusion: Data sharing commitments in DRKS revealed a low awareness of CRF sharing. Survey results showed generally strong support for CRF sharing, including the willingness to publish CRFs in a public registry, although legal and practical barriers were identified.
    Keywords:  case report forms; clinical research; cross‐sectional survey; interoperability; metadata classification; metadata repository; metadata standards; metadata trends; sharing of metadata; translational research
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10456
  34. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan;35(Suppl 1): S148-S154
    Indexing of Journals and Indices of Publications.
    Biju Vasudevan, Manas Chatterjee, Vishal Sharma, Ravinder Sahdev.
      Journal indexes are indicators toward the quality of a journal. Authors, researchers, and the audience need some criteria to judge which literature they need to read or which journal they need to send their article to. Journal indexes help the respective groups to make this decision. From Index Medicus to Web of Science, journal indexes use different criteria to judge the quality of a journal or an article. Figures like impact factor and CiteScore also rank journals and articles based on various criteria so that the audience and authors can make their pick. Author indices like h-index and ResearchGate score aid in comparing scientific work done by authors and researchers. Indexes of journals, publications, and authors therefore offer a classification of medical literature from which the best can be chosen depending on the requirements in their respective fields.
    Keywords:  author; database; index; indexing; publication
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1800878
  35. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan;35(Suppl 1): S18-S29
    Insights into Radiology Publications.
    Paul Sathiadoss, Rajesh Bhayana, Zara A Shaikh, Satheesh Krishna.
      The evolution of modern medicine has been significantly driven by medical and health care research, underscoring the importance of disseminating findings to advance health care. Medical literature, encompassing various publication types such as case reports, review articles, and original research, plays a crucial role in this process by facilitating the communication and discussion of new discoveries. This review article provides a comprehensive guide to understanding and navigating radiologic publications. It examines the various types of radiologic research articles, including case reports and series, pictorial reviews, original research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, each of which serve distinct purposes in contributing to the field of radiology. The study adopts the "six honest men" approach-addressing why, who, what, when, where, and how-to elucidate the essential elements of successful radiology research and publication. Key topics include the motivations for publishing, the types of articles suited for different research questions, and strategic considerations for selecting appropriate journals. Additionally, the review highlights the importance of understanding publication timing, journal selection criteria, and the overall publication process, including manuscript preparation and peer review. By offering these insights, the review aims to equip early-career researchers with the knowledge and skills necessary to effectively contribute to radiology literature and advance their academic and professional careers.
    Keywords:  case report; case series; manuscript; meta-analysis; original article; pictorial review; publications; radiology; review article; systematic review
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1793914
  36. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan;35(Suppl 1): S102-S109
    Navigating the Editorial Gauntlet for Excellence in Radiology Publishing.
    Chander Mohan, Manphool Singhal, Ashish Verma.
      Any scientific journal of repute constantly strives to ensure the highest possible quality, integrity, and ethical standards of published research. This article attempts to the highlight multifaceted responsibilities of an Editor in Chief (EiC) and editors such as managing the peer review process, detecting plagiarism, and ensuring quality of selected manuscript before publication. The EiC also has to tackle issues of salami slicing, duplicate submissions, secondary publications, and guest and ghost authorship while adhering to constantly evolving guidelines of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The EiC has to ensure adherence to journal guidelines, confidentiality in rigorous review by motivated reviewers, preventing reviewer burnout, incentivization of reviewers, and the review by biostatistician of manuscripts having large data set for appropriateness of statistical analysis. This article emphasizes the decision-making strategies to balance quality with timely publication, maintaining confidentiality, and managing conflicts of interest by the EiC. It also discusses the role of the EiC in educating prospective authors and residents on academic writing, and the optimal utilization of an advisory board to advance the journal's mission. Finally, the EiC's role in managing permissions for the reuse of published images, collaborating with editors of other journals, and enhancing the journal's indexing and impact factor is underscored. This article provides essential best practices for maintaining high ethical and publication standards in radiology journals and the maze that the editor has to wade through in ensuring all of these. In addition, the EiC needs to maintain the highest level of motivation throughout the tenure as it is an honorary responsibility undertaken voluntarily.
    Keywords:  editorial challenges; editorial gauntlet; radiology publishing
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1801269
  37. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan;35(Suppl 1): S163-S170
    Approach to Publishing a Scientific (Radiology) Book.
    Harshith Gowda Ramesh, Manisha Jana, Ashu Seith Bhalla.
      In the modern landscape of information technology, the role of books remains pivotal in education and research, especially in scientific fields such as radiology. This article outlines a comprehensive approach to publishing a scientific book in radiology, from the initial concept to distribution and ongoing updates. The process is influenced by factors such as the author's motivation, expertise, and target audience. Key prerequisites include a clear understanding of the subject, proficiency in writing and layout planning, and adherence to publication ethics. The book's content should be tailored to the intended readership, with considerations for content depth and presentation style. Decisions regarding book size, color versus black-and-white printing, and publication format (print vs. online) are crucial. Factors such as cost, physical characteristics, and the choice between paperback and hardcover affect both the book's accessibility and its durability. The online version offers interactive features and updatable content, while print versions provide a tactile reading experience. Authors are responsible for content creation, including illustrations, and chapter structure. Editors play a crucial role in maintaining uniformity, overseeing content quality, and ensuring technical accuracy. Collaboration with section editors and coauthors is often necessary for comprehensive coverage. Effective distribution and marketing strategies are essential for reaching the target audience. Options include direct retail distribution or using aggregators. Regular updates are vital to keep the book relevant amidst the fast-growing field of radiology. This guide serves as a practical roadmap for aspiring authors and editors in the field of radiology.
    Keywords:  book chapter; book education; ebook; medical books; publisher; textbook
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1792043
  38. J Perinat Med. 2025 Jan 13.
    The J ournal of P erinatal M edicine is switching its publication model to open access.
    Joachim W Dudenhausen.
      
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2025-0009
  39. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2025 Jan;12(1): 7-10
    MDCP the First 10 Years Bygone-New Editors' Note to the Readership.
    Tim Lynch, Davide Martino.
      
    Keywords:  Editorial; movement disorders; phenomenology
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14290
  40. J Cell Commun Signal. 2025 Mar;19(1): e12064
    I had a dream.
    Bernard Perbal.
      Expressing hopes and desires is an essential part of communication, and communication is the major pillar of the Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling. There comes the time of giving the responsibility of leading JCCS to a new editor in chief and I am taking this opportunity to comment on a few recent milestones and future of the journal which I created in 2007, after I had created "Cell Communication and Signaling" 20 years ago (1), one of the first open access journals.
    Keywords:  Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling; editor in chief; editorial board
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1002/ccs3.12064
  41. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2025 Jan;383(2288): 20240557
    Editorial: new Editor-in-Chief and the 360th anniversary of Philosophical Transactions.
    C Richard A Catlow.
      
    Keywords:  Earth science; chemistry; computer science; engineering; maths; physics
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0557
  42. IJTLD Open. 2025 Jan;2(1): 1-2
    A year in review - evaluating the launch of IJTLD OPEN.
    H D Blackbourn, G B Migliori.
      One year on from the launch of our new open access (OA) journal, IJTLD OPEN, we review its impact. Similar to our flagship journal, the IJTLD, articles published in IJTLD OPEN span a range of topics related to lung health and the majority focus on TB in low- to middle-income countries (LMICs). Interestingly, there has been no lag period in readers accessing the content, with downloads for IJTLD OPEN soon matching and exceeding those for the IJTLD. This demonstrates that OA is helping us to achieve our goal of improving knowledge dissemination in LMICs, where there is restricted access to subscription journals. Citation analysis of the first few issues of IJTLD OPEN also suggests that this higher level of downloads is leading to articles being cited at an accelerated rate.
    Keywords:  International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease; The Union; cOAlition S; open access
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0613
This page is being maintained by Thomas Krichel. It was last updated on 2025‒01‒23 at 6:18.