bims-skolko Biomed News
on Scholarly communication
Issue of 2025–10–26
29 papers selected by
Thomas Krichel, Open Library Society



  1. Cardiol Young. 2025 Oct 20. 1-5
      The peer review process is fundamental to academic publishing, guaranteeing the integrity and quality of the research upon which we depend. However, it is also infamous for its sluggishness-occasionally excruciatingly so. For numerous authors, the prolonged wait for feedback on their articles might seem interminable, particularly when they are enthusiastic about disseminating innovative discoveries to the public. But why exactly does peer review take so long? The reasons are complex and multifaceted, involving challenges faced by editors, reviewers, and authors alike. By understanding these challenges, we can start to see the bigger picture and work towards solutions that might speed things up."Patience requires knowing not just the cost of delay, but also the benefit of delay""The two most powerful warriors are patience and time."-Leo Tolstoy"Lost time is never found again." - Benjamin Franklin.
    Keywords:  Article submission process; editor engagement; peer review; peer review shortcomings; research evaluation
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951125110111
  2. Imeta. 2025 Oct;4(5): e70085
      Social media platforms have revolutionized scientific communication by bridging gaps between researchers, academic journals, and global audiences. This article showcases iMeta, an open-access journal that leverages a diversified social media framework to enhance bilingual dissemination, boost full-text downloads, and amplify international influence. Since its editorial board founded, iMeta has achieved a series of milestones: integrating platforms like WeChat, Bilibili, X (formerly Twitter), YouTube, and BlueSky; launching iMeta-branded journals iMetaOmics and iMetaMed; and being indexed in prominent databases including PubMed, SCIE, and ESI. As of August 2025, the journal has recorded 1,334,761 full-text downloads and 10,560 total citations, with a 2024 impact factor of 33.2. A significant positive correlation between downloads and citations highlights how strategic social media integration and iMeta's growth drive visibility and influence, positioning it as a leading journal in its field.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1002/imt2.70085
  3. Sci Commun. 2025 Dec;47(6): 897-905
      The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the use of preprints, aiding rapid research dissemination but also facilitating the spread of misinformation. This study analyzes media coverage of preprints from 2014 to 2023, revealing a significant postpandemic decline. Our findings suggest that heightened awareness of the risks associated with preprints has led to more cautious media practices. While the decline in preprint coverage may mitigate concerns about premature media exposure, it also raises questions about the future role of preprints in science communication, especially during emergencies. Balanced policies based on up-to-date evidence are needed to address this shift.
    Keywords:  COVID-19; altmetrics; journalism; news; preprints; science communication
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470241285405
  4. Nature. 2025 Oct 23.
      
    Keywords:  Authorship; Publishing; Research data
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-03281-4
  5. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2025 Oct 22. pii: S1879-7296(25)00143-7. [Epub ahead of print]
      
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2025.10.005
  6. Nature. 2025 Oct;646(8086): 792-794
      
    Keywords:  Ethics; Publishing; Scientific community
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-03341-9
  7. Microlife. 2025 ;6 uqaf029
      Scientific publishing faces a credibility crisis driven to a very large extent by predatory journals, paper mills, and exploitative open-access (OA) practices. Structural pressures-publish-or-perish culture, mandatory OA policies, and author publication charges-driven business models-fuel the proliferation of low-quality or fraudulent research, now exacerbated by artificial intelligence-generated content. This opinion, which aligns with a growing clamour from the research community-calls for an international journal accreditation system, guided by a transparent code of conduct and enforced by funding agencies, to restore integrity, prioritize quality over quantity for professional progression, and safeguard trust in scientific communication.
    Keywords:  journal accreditation; open access; predatory publishing; research reliability; scientific integrity
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1093/femsml/uqaf029
  8. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Oct 16. pii: S2468-7855(25)00405-7. [Epub ahead of print] 102620
      
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102620
  9. Rev Saude Publica. 2025 ;pii: S0034-89102025000100223. [Epub ahead of print]59 e25
       OBJECTIVE: To characterize retractions of biomedical research papers that had a least one author affiliated with a Latin American (LATAM) institution.
    METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of retracted research papers published in scientific journals focusing on the field of biomedical research and identified by means of the Retraction Watch database. The retracted articles identified were required to have at least one author whose institutional affiliation was in a LATAM country. Data were collected on the authors' countries and institutional affiliations, the reason for retraction, dates of publication and retraction, indexing, journal quartile and impact factor. Reasons for retraction were categorized into three major groups, i.e., scientific misconduct, error, and not specified.
    RESULTS: According to Retraction Watch, 181 papers were retracted across 1987-2024 which fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Guatemala, Bolivia, Peru, Panama, Ecuador, Colombia, and Argentina were the countries that had a retraction rate above 1 per 10 thousand papers throughout the study period. The principal reason for retraction was scientific misconduct (63.0%) followed by honest error (21.5%). The main causes of retraction due to scientific misconduct were ethical and legal problems (33.1%), followed by fabrication/falsification (20.2%).
    CONCLUSION: The number of retractions in some LATAM countries, mainly due to scientific misconduct, highlights the need to strengthen ethical practices in research. Future initiatives should focus on developing and evaluating effective strategies to prevent misconduct and promote scientific integrity.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059006328
  10. Open Respir Arch. 2025 Oct-Dec;7(4):7(4): 100496
       Objective: The aim was to examine reasons for retraction and rates of article retraction in the field of smoking.
    Material and methods: We conducted an observational study and searched the largest database of articles that have been retracted.
    Results: We found 83 papers that were retracted from 1988 to 2024. According to the type of document (documents typologies), the majority were original articles (74 papers). The 83 documents have been retracted in 65 different journals. The retracted papers' citation counts were examined by searching Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus, and we have observed that a quarter (26.5%) of the 68 articles available in the WoS database had increased their citations, despite the fact that they were retracted works. The reasons for retraction were unreliable, inconsistent, erroneous, or missing data or an incorrect conclusion; duplication of previously published articles; duplication of images into the articles or in previous articles; conflicts of interest; the ethical/plagiarism policy and authorship issues concerns; fake peer reviews; data falsification/data error; articles retracted at the authors' request; and unknown causes of retraction and journal publisher's error.
    Conclusions: Unreliable, inconsistent, inaccurate, or missing data; an incorrect conclusion; or duplication/already published articles; duplication of images; and conflicts of interest are the main causes of retractions. Retracted articles have been increasing in number over the years, and additionally, the amount of time that passes between an article's publication and retraction is getting shorter. We verify that retracted articles indeed continue to gain citations after the retraction, some even more than before.
    Keywords:  Bibliometric analysis; Research; Retraction; Scientific misconduct; Smoking; Tobacco
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.opresp.2025.100496
  11. Am J Nurs. 2025 Nov 01. 125(11): 52-55
       ABSTRACT: The widespread availability of generative artificial intelligence (genAI) continues to transform the scholarly communication process. With wide access to genAI tools, authors now not only have the benefits these tools can provide, such as creation of text, tables, and figures, but also the responsibility to use these tools with integrity and transparency. Examples of concerns about the use of genAI tools include ethical and legal breaches; inaccurate, biased, or fabricated content; and lack of accountability. Given the potential for serious harm to patients as well as the undermining of the credibility of scholarly communication with the use of unchecked content, it is essential for nurse authors to also include their judgment and subject matter expertise in the preparation of a scholarly manuscript that includes AI-generated information. This article offers a brief overview of recent research findings related to the use of genAI tools to support scholarly writing and provides guidelines for clinicians, educators, and other nurse authors on the appropriate use of AI in the preparation of manuscripts. Information is also provided about authorship, accuracy of content and references, biases and misrepresentations within AI-generated content, plagiarism, and appropriate disclosure of AI tools in manuscript preparation.
    Keywords:  AI bias; chatbots; generative artificial intelligence; scholarly communication; writing for publication
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1097/AJN.0000000000000179
  12. J Nucl Med. 2025 Oct 23. pii: jnumed.125.271403. [Epub ahead of print]
      
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.125.271403
  13. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2025 Oct 24. pii: llaf470. [Epub ahead of print]
      
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1093/ced/llaf470
  14. Open Res Eur. 2025 ;5 295
      Open data are crucial for scientific knowledge production, transparency and accountability, as well as innovation. The European Union has implemented various policies and regulatory frameworks for open government data and open scientific data, as well as for data sharing and re-use of non-government data. However, the mere availability of open data does not ensure its reuse and distributional benefit to society, and its production can meet sustainability challenges. Working with open data requires data skills, access to data infrastructures, and regulatory guidance to address privacy, confidentiality and intellectual property requirements. Further, critical scholarship has cautioned against the de facto valorisation of open data, and urges focus on the socio-technical and political aspects of production, dissemination and use of open data beyond mere economic value. This open letter is building upon findings of an interdisciplinary Marie Curie Action Innovative Training Network focussed on 'Open Data ECOsystems' (ODECO). It claims that in a data-driven economy and a datafied society, more attention needs to be paid to the conditions within which open data is produced, disseminated and used, and by whom. Accordingly, this open letter provides a set of actionable recommendations for both practitioners and policymakers, to support sustainability as well as economic and social value in open data initiatives, through proposals in areas including data quality, governance, participation and infrastructure.
    Keywords:  Open data; economic value; open data governance; open data infrastructure; participation; principles; recommendations; social value
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.21212.1
  15. Bioscience. 2025 Oct;75(10): 820-830
      We analyzed 192 publications from two EU projects focused on aquatic mesocosm facilities for a) the number of data publications in a repository on its own and the number of data publications associated with a scientific paper, b) the time lag between mesocosm experiments and data or paper publication, and c) adherence of scientific papers to FAIR principles of data publication. More data sets were published alongside scientific papers (103) than in a data repository alone (17). The time lag between experimental end to paper publication (34.9 months) was not significantly different from the time lag between experimental end to data publication (36.7 months). Regarding FAIR principles, 32.6% of papers achieved the highest scores (7 or 8), emphasizing a high data transparency relative to other disciplines. To improve data publications, we recommend increased support (especially for interoperability) for and recognition of researchers, as well as increased efforts by journals, repositories, and funders.
    Keywords:  data availability statement; data on request; environmental data; open access; open science
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaf081
  16. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2025 Oct 20.
      This column addresses the knotty problems and dilemmas many scholars grapple with when studying health professions education. In this article, the authors examine whether a journal is the most suitable format for disseminating research. We explore other venues that researchers have used to reach specific audiences, and we describe how to present rigorous scholarship in those venues.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-025-10483-y
  17. Med Sci Educ. 2025 Aug;35(4): 2169-2174
      Medical education conferences have become a routine way to disseminate scholarly activity in the form of workshops, posters, or oral reports. Curricular developments, assessment tools, teaching innovations, and faculty development initiatives are just some examples of the submission types to medical education conferences. Just as it is important to uphold rigor and standards to the examination of medical education research publications, it is essential to have guidelines from which medical education conference abstracts are appraised, and there is a lack of written recommendations for this in the literature. We propose 12 tips to guide reviewers of such medical education conference abstracts with our structured approach.
    Keywords:  Abstract reviewer; Medical education conferences; Medical education scholarship; Peer review
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-025-02371-2
  18. J Exp Biol. 2025 Oct 15. pii: jeb251647. [Epub ahead of print]228(20):
      Throughout 2025, we are celebrating the 100th anniversary of The Company of Biologists, the not-for-profit publisher of Journal of Experimental Biology and its sister journals - Development, Journal of Cell Science, Disease Models & Mechanisms and Biology Open. In celebration of this landmark, we are publishing articles reflecting on the role of the Company and some of the events that have marked the year. In this Perspective, I consider the broader impact of Journal of Experimental Biology in the fields of conservation and engineering, reflecting on the influence of the journal and broader applications of the research that it publishes.
    Keywords:  Anniversary; Impact; The Company of Biologists
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.251647
  19. Acad Radiol. 2025 Oct 23. pii: S1076-6332(25)00964-X. [Epub ahead of print]
      
    Keywords:  FOAM; Medical education
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.10.008
  20. J Korean Soc Radiol. 2025 Sep;86(5): 687-692
      In celebrating the 80th anniversary of the Korean Society of Radiology (KSR), this special report was prepared to reflect on the 60-year history of the Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology (JKSR) and to explore its future direction. This report is the first of a three-part series and summarizes the journal's evolution in various aspects, including its title changes, publication frequency, editorial structure, article types, the influence of advances in imaging equipment, and indexing in academic databases. In particular, as the JKSR increasingly expands its role as a society journal alongside its function as a scientific journal, in response to evolving demands, this report compares the JKSR's editorial direction and content with that of the Journal of the American College of Radiology. Based on this comparison, this report proposes strategic directions for the future development of the JKSR.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2025.0052