bims-ovdlit Biomed News
on Ovarian cancer: early diagnosis, liquid biopsy and therapy
Issue of 2026–03–15
six papers selected by
Lara Paracchini, Humanitas Research



  1. Gynecol Oncol. 2026 Mar 11. pii: S0090-8258(26)00812-7. [Epub ahead of print]208 1-7
       BACKGROUND: Women with inherited susceptibility or a strong family history of ovarian cancer, particularly carriers of pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants, face a markedly increased lifetime risk. To mitigate this risk, current guidelines recommend risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) between ages 35 and 40 for BRCA1 and between ages 40 and 45 for BRCA2 METHODS: We conducted an ambispective multicenter study in France including 1351 women at high risk of ovarian cancer, 984 of whom carried BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants, totaling 7433.3 woman-years of follow-up. When histological reports from RRSO revealed abnormalities, surgical specimens were reviewed, with special focus on the fallopian tubes to identify serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC). The incidence of peritoneal carcinoma (PC) after RRSO was recorded.
    RESULTS: STIC was detected in 14 patients at RRSO (10 BRCA1; 2 BRCA2 carriers). During follow-up, 4 women developed PC, corresponding to a 5-years cumulative incidence of 0.4% in the overall cohort and 0.5% among BRCA1/2 carriers. Age at surgery was significantly associated with pathological findings: invasive carcinoma was detected at a median age of 55 years, STIC at 54 years, and benign lesions at 51 years (p < 0.001). Notably, women with STIC at RRSO had a 5-year PC risk of 11.1%.
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the importance of early RRSO, meticulous tubal evaluation, and extended post-surgical surveillance in genetically at-risk women. Detection of STIC warrants tailored follow-up strategies. Further studies are needed to assess the effectiveness and morbidity of staging surgery or regular monitoring using CA125 or innovative markers such as ctDNA.
    Keywords:  BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes; Breast and ovarian predisposition; Ovarian cancer risk; Peritoneal cancer risk; RRSO; STIC
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2026.02.019
  2. EBioMedicine. 2026 Mar 07. pii: S2352-3964(26)00081-2. [Epub ahead of print]126 106199
       BACKGROUND: Pathogenic germline variants in certain genes are associated with somatic tumour mutation signatures. The use of somatic tumour mutation data has the potential to improve the identification of true pathogenic variants but remains underexplored. We investigated the integration of tumour homologous recombination (HR) deficiency status as a predictor of pathogenicity for germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants, building on the established link between HR deficiency and germline pathogenic variants in these genes.
    METHODS: We analysed breast tumour whole-genome sequence and matching germline data from 350 patients across four datasets: Familial Breast Cancer (N = 77), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA-BRCA, N = 96), the MAGIC study (N = 136), and Q-IMPROvE (N = 41). A total of 15,156 germline variants (including structural variations) in BRCA1, BRCA2, and other cancer genes (ATM, BARD1, BRIP1, CHEK2, PALB2, PTEN, RAD51C, RAD51D, TP53) underwent variant curation. Patients were categorised based on germline classification as BRCA1 positive (N = 27), BRCA2 positive (N = 21), and BRCA1/2 negative (N = 232), excluding those with BRCA1/2 variants of uncertain significance (N = 8) and pathogenic or only uncertain variants in other cancer genes (N = 62). Somatic HR status (deficient or proficient) was predicted using three algorithms: HRDetect, CHORD, and HRDsum. HR-deficient and HR-proficient status were significant predictors of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant status (positive and negative directions).
    FINDINGS: The CHORD algorithm, which estimates BRCA1 and BRCA2 subtype specifically, added precision contributing evidence towards pathogenicity for the corresponding gene, reaching pathogenic moderate strength for the relevant gene-subtype. Finally, we assessed CHORD HR predictions for variants of uncertain significance in BRCA1 and BRCA2, and reported their tumour HR status for potential use as additional evidence in variant curation.
    INTERPRETATION: Analysis across multiple tumour whole-genome sequencing datasets has shown that HR status prediction algorithms can separate profiles for BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants and provide further evidence at increased weight to aid in the classification of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. Tumour sequencing offers a promising strategy for reducing the uncertainty in germline variant interpretation.
    FUNDING: This work was funded by the National Breast Cancer Foundation.
    Keywords:  BRCA1; BRCA2; CHORD; Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD); Tumour mutation signatures; Variant classification
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2026.106199
  3. JCO Precis Oncol. 2026 Mar;10(3): e2500725
       PURPOSE: A multicancer early detection (MCED) test was developed and validated in the case-control Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas (CCGA) study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02889978). Previous analysis of the second (cross-validation) CCGA substudy identified prognostic value of cancer signal detection by the MCED test with 3-year follow-up. Here, we evaluated the prognostic value of a cancer signal detected (CSD) result in the third (validation) CCGA substudy (CCGA3) using an updated statistical methodology with 5-year follow-up.
    METHODS: CCGA3 participants with confirmed cancer were followed for up to 5 years; overall survival was stratified by MCED test result (CSD or no CSD [NCSD]). Observed survival was compared with the expected survival of a reference population calculated from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data matched to clinical characteristics (age, sex, cancer type, and stage) in each signal detection group.
    RESULTS: Of 2,513 participants with stageable, invasive cancer, 792 (31.5%) died and 1,683 (67.0%) were confirmed alive at follow-up, with 38 (1.5%) lost to follow-up. CSD rates were higher in participants who died during follow-up compared with those alive (85% v 34%). Overall observed survival versus expected survival was similar for CSD (43% observed v 40% expected) and NCSD (88% observed v 81% expected) groups. For NCSD, hazard ratios (HRs) were more favorable (<1) relative to the matched reference population at all stages (P < .0001); for CSD, HRs were <1 at stages III to IV (P < .0001) and ≅1 at stages I to II (P > .4).
    CONCLUSION: CSD cancers had long-term survival similar to expectations, even in early stages, indicating that CSD early-stage cancers are unlikely to be more micrometastatic and lethal than cancers detected by conventional means. The MCED test was likely to find clinically significant cancers without contributing to overdiagnosis.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-25-00725
  4. N Engl J Med. 2026 Mar 12. pii: 10.1056/NEJMc2518638#sa1. [Epub ahead of print]394(11): 1140-1141
      
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2518638