bims-ovdlit Biomed News
on Ovarian cancer: early diagnosis, liquid biopsy and therapy
Issue of 2025–11–02
three papers selected by
Lara Paracchini, Humanitas Research



  1. Nat Commun. 2025 Oct 31. 16(1): 9625
      Blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) has the potential to simultaneously screen for multiple deadly cancers with high positive predictive value. To assess real-world performance, we evaluated the Galleri® MCED test (GRAIL, Inc.) across 111,080 individuals (median age 58 years, 55.5% males). This MCED test analyzes methylation patterns of cell-free DNA to detect presence of a cancer signal and predict the anatomical cancer signal origin (CSO) to facilitate diagnostic evaluation. Cancer signal detection rate was 0.91% (1011/111,080), consistent with clinical studies and independent modeled values. Providers reported clinical outcome for 459 of 1011 individuals with cancer signal detected MCED tests. Of these, 258 had an invasive cancer diagnosis, spanning 32 cancer types. The MCED test correctly predicted the CSO in 87% of cases with a reported cancer type, consistent with previous clinical studies. CSO enabled efficient workup in most patients, with a median 39.5 days from result receipt to cancer diagnosis.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64094-7
  2. Int J Cancer. 2025 Nov 01.
      Approximately 70% of ovarian cancer (OC) patients relapse after chemotherapy, underscoring the need to assess survival before second-line treatment. We previously identified PLAT-M8, an 8-CpG blood-based methylation signature linked to chemoresistance. This study validates its correlation with clinicopathological features and treatment profiles in additional cohorts. Extracted DNA from whole blood was provided from the BriTROC-1 (n = 47) and OV04 cohorts (n = 57) upon the first relapse. Additional samples from Hammersmith Hospital (n = 100) were collected during first-line chemotherapy (Cycles 3-4 and 6). Bisulphite pyrosequencing was used to quantify DNA methylation at the previously identified 8 CpG sites. The methylation data obtained were combined with previous data from ScoTROC-1D and 1V (n = 141) and OCTIPS (n = 46). Cox regression was used to assess OS after relapse concerning clinicopathological characteristics. The DNA methylation Class (Class 1 vs. 2) was determined by consensus clustering. As for results, blood DNA methylation at relapse correlates with clinical outcomes, but it has no impact during first-line treatment. Class 1 is linked to shorter survival (summary OS: HR 2.50, 1.64-3.79) and poorer prognosis on carboplatin monotherapy (OS: aHR 9.69, 95% CI: 2.38-39.47). It is associated with older (>75 years), advanced-stage, platinum-resistant patients, residual disease, and shorter PFS. In contrast, Class 2 is linked to platinum sensitivity, higher complete response rates (RECIST), and better prognosis but shows no correlation with CA-125. These findings highlight PLAT-M8's potential in guiding second-line chemotherapy decisions. The PLAT-M8 methylation biomarker is associated with survival in relapsed OC patients and may potentially predict their response to second-line platinum treatment.
    Keywords:  DNA methylation; epigenetic biomarker; ovarian cancer; platinum‐based chemotherapy; survival
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70217
  3. Gigascience. 2025 Oct 30. pii: giaf139. [Epub ahead of print]
       BACKGROUND: While cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a promising biomarker for cancer diagnosis and monitoring, there is limited agreement on optimal cfDNA collection and extraction protocols as well as analysis pipelines of the corresponding cfDNA sequencing data. In this paper, we address the latter by studying the effect of various bioinformatics preprocessing choices on derived genetic and epigenetic cfDNA features and study how observed feature differences influence the downstream task of separating between healthy and cancer cfDNA samples.
    RESULTS: Using low-pass whole-genome cfDNA sequencing data from 20 lung cancer and 20 healthy samples, we assessed the influence of various preprocessing settings such a read trimming, filtering of secondary alignments and choice of genome build as well as practices such as downsampling or selecting for short fragment on derived cfDNA features including cfDNA fragment size, fragment end motifs, copy number alterations, and nucleosome footprints. Our results demonstrate that the analyzed features are robust to common preprocessing choices, but exhibit variable sensitivity to sequencing coverage. Fragment length statistics and end motifs are the least affected by low coverages, whereas nucleosome footprint analysis is very sensitive to it. Our findings confirm that selecting for shorter fragments, enhances cancer-specific signals, however, by removing data, also reduces signals in general. Interestingly, we find that fragment end motif analysis benefits the most from in silico size selection. We also observe that the filtering of low-quality and secondary alignments and choice of genome build result in slight improvements in cancer classification performance based on nucleosome coverage and copy number features.
    CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, we conclude that cfDNA analysis is minimally affected by different bioinformatics preprocessing settings, however we describe some synergistic effects between analytical approaches, which can be leveraged to improve cancer detection.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giaf139