bims-nocaut Biomed News
on Non-canonical autophagy
Issue of 2025–03–16
two papers selected by
Quentin Frenger, University of Strasbourg



  1. Cell Res. 2025 Mar 07.
      Cancer cells with RAS mutations exhibit enhanced autophagy, essential for their proliferation and survival, making it a potential target for therapeutic intervention. However, the regulatory differences between RAS-induced autophagy and physiological autophagy remain poorly understood, complicating the development of cancer-specific anti-autophagy treatments. In this study, we identified a form of non-canonical autophagy induced by oncogenic KRAS expression, termed RAS-induced non-canonical autophagy via ATG8ylation (RINCAA). RINCAA involves distinct autophagic factors compared to those in starvation-induced autophagy and incorporates non-autophagic components, resulting in the formation of non-canonical autophagosomes with multivesicular/multilaminar structures labeled by ATG8 family proteins (e.g., LC3 and GABARAP). We have designated these structures as RAS-induced multivesicular/multilaminar bodies of ATG8ylation (RIMMBA). A notable feature of RINCAA is the substitution of the class III PI3K in canonical autophagy with PI4KB in RINCAA. We identified a regulatory P38-ULK1-PI4KB-WIPI2 signaling cascade governing this process, where ULK1 triggers PI4KB phosphorylation at S256 and T263, initiating PI4P production, ATG8ylation, and non-canonical autophagy. Importantly, elevated PI4KB phosphorylation at S256 and T263 was observed in RAS-mutated cancer cells and colorectal cancer specimens. Inhibition of PI4KB S256 and T263 phosphorylation led to a reduction in RINCAA activity and tumor growth in both xenograft and KPC models of pancreatic cancer, suggesting that targeting ULK1-mediated PI4KB phosphorylation could represent a promising therapeutic strategy for RAS-mutated cancers.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-025-01085-9
  2. Trends Cell Biol. 2025 Mar 10. pii: S0962-8924(25)00041-8. [Epub ahead of print]
      Lysosomes are essential membrane-bound organelles that control cellular homeostasis by integrating intracellular functions with external signals. Their critical roles make lysosomal membranes vulnerable to rupture under various stressors, leading to cellular dysfunction. However, the mechanisms by which cells respond to lysosomal damage have only recently begun to be explored. In this review, we summarize the cellular mechanisms activated by lysosomal damage, emphasizing those that restore lysosomal integrity and sustain homeostasis, including recognition, repair, removal, replacement, and remodeling. Drawing on our expertise, we provide an in-depth focus on the remodeling process involved in these responses, including metabolic signaling and stress granule formation. Finally, we discuss the implications of lysosomal damage in human diseases, underscoring potential therapeutic strategies to preserve lysosomal function and alleviate related disorders.
    Keywords:  damaged lysosomes; recognition; remodeling; removal; repair; replacement
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2025.02.007