Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 May 01. 15(5): 4274-4285
Background: Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) comprises most SCLC cases, with up to 40% of patients failing to achieve an objective response (OR) to first-line treatment. The prognostic value of conventional fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) metabolic parameters, such as maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), remains limited and controversial. Dynamic PET imaging with 18F-FDG provides detailed temporal and metabolic data, reflecting tumor heterogeneity more effectively, but its potential for predicting treatment response in ES-SCLC remains inadequately explored. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between time-activity curve (TAC) features from dynamic PET imaging and treatment outcomes in ES-SCLC, assisting in developing personalized treatment strategies.
Methods: This prospective pilot cohort study enrolled 15 patients with SCLC who planned to undergo dynamic PET imaging (November 2022 to January 2024). All participants underwent dynamic PET imaging before receiving first-line treatment. Tumor regions of interest (ROIs) were delineated on the PET images to facilitate the calculation of TAC. From these curves, 6 dynamic features were derived. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied to evaluate the significance of variations in continuous variables, encompassing both TAC features and conventional metabolic parameters. Statistically significant features were used to distinguish between the OR group and the non-objective response (non-OR) group and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated.
Results: A total of 10 patients were included for analysis. Clinical characteristics such as age, gender, smoking history, and treatment regimens were similar between the OR and non-OR groups. Analyses of conventional metabolic features [SUXmax, minimum standardized uptake value (SUVmin), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG)] did not reveal significant differences between the groups (all P>0.05), with MTV showing a trend towards significance (P=0.095). Among the TAC features, the slope of the TAC between 10 to 30 minutes (Slope 10-30) demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the OR and non-OR groups (P=0.011), suggesting its potential as a predictive marker for treatment response (AUC: 0.960). We identified two optimal cutoff values for Slope 10-30: a threshold of 0.070 and a threshold of -0.018. After excluding an outlier patient with extensive metastatic dissemination affecting typical uptake patterns, the optimal cutoff value was determined to be -0.018.
Conclusions: The TAC feature (Slope 10-30) in dynamic PET imaging may serve as an indicative predictor of treatment response in ES-SCLC, suggesting its utility in guiding treatment personalization by assessing metabolic heterogeneity between tumors.
Keywords: Dynamic positron emission tomography (Dynamic PET); small cell lung cancer (SCLC); treatment response