bims-myxlip Biomed News
on Myxoid liposarcoma
Issue of 2024‒04‒28
two papers selected by
Laura Mannarino, Humanitas Research



  1. J Transl Med. 2024 Apr 26. 22(1): 389
      BACKGROUND: Myxoid liposarcoma (MLS) displays a distinctive tumor microenvironment and is characterized by the FUS::DDIT3 fusion oncogene, however, the precise functional contributions of these two elements remain enigmatic in tumor development.METHODS: To study the cell-free microenvironment in MLS, we developed an experimental model system based on decellularized patient-derived xenograft tumors. We characterized the cell-free scaffold using mass spectrometry. Subsequently, scaffolds were repopulated using sarcoma cells with or without FUS::DDIT3 expression that were analyzed with histology and RNA sequencing.
    RESULTS: Characterization of cell-free MLS scaffolds revealed intact structure and a large variation of protein types remaining after decellularization. We demonstrated an optimal culture time of 3 weeks and showed that FUS::DDIT3 expression decreased cell proliferation and scaffold invasiveness. The cell-free MLS microenvironment and FUS::DDIT3 expression both induced biological processes related to cell-to-cell and cell-to-extracellular matrix interactions, as well as chromatin remodeling, immune response, and metabolism. Data indicated that FUS::DDIT3 expression more than the microenvironment determined the pre-adipocytic phenotype that is typical for MLS.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our experimental approach opens new means to study the tumor microenvironment in detail and our findings suggest that FUS::DDIT3-expressing tumor cells can create their own extracellular niche.
    Keywords:  Extracellular matrix; FET fusion oncogenes; FUS::DDIT3; Microenvironment; Myxoid liposarcoma; Scaffold
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-024-05211-w
  2. Int J Clin Oncol. 2024 Apr 24.
      BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Because myxoid liposarcomas are more radiosensitive than other soft tissue sarcomas, there have been several reports of 50 Gy preoperative radiation therapy combined with surgery, but the wound complication rate is reportedly high. We have performed preoperative irradiation at a reduced dose of 40 Gy and definitive radiation therapy for unresectable cases. This study aimed to report the tumor reduction rate and oncological results with a reduced dose of preoperative irradiation and the outcome of definitive irradiation for unresectable cases.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with myxoid liposarcoma treated in our institution between 2002 and 2021 were included. We examined the tumor volume shrinkage rate with preoperative radiation, compared complications and oncological outcomes between preoperative radiation and surgery-only cases, and investigated the prognosis and tumor shrinkage of definitive radiation cases.
    RESULTS: The total dose irradiated was 40 Gy except in two cases. The mean tumor volume reduction rate was 52.0%. A decreased dose of preoperative radiation did not worsen clinical outcomes with fewer complications. The total dose of definitive radiation was approximately 60 Gy. The mean tumor volume reduction rate was 55.0%. The tumor shrinkage maintenance rate was 100% in a median follow-up period of 50.5 months.
    CONCLUSION: Preoperative radiation therapy for myxoid liposarcoma near vital organs is a good approach because even with a reduced dose of 40 Gy, significant tumor reduction and excellent results were achieved. Definitive radiation therapy is the recommended treatment for older patients with serious comorbidities or inoperable patients.
    Keywords:  Definitive radiation therapy; Myxoid liposarcoma; Preoperative radiation therapy; Tumor volume shrinkage
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02534-y