bims-mitost 2019-05-26 papers

Issue of 2019–05–26
four papers selected by
Yvonne Will

J Clin Lipidol. 2019 May 16. pii: S1933-2874(19)30087-X. [Epub ahead of print]

The STatin Adverse Treatment Experience Survey: Experience of patients reporting side effects of statin therapy.

Terry A Jacobson, Mary Katherine Cheeley, Peter H Jones, Ralph La Forge, Kevin C Maki, J Antonio G López, Pin Xiang, Donald M Bushnell, Mona L Martin, Jerome D Cohen.

BACKGROUND: It is important to understand patients' experiences of statin-associated adverse effects to potentially identify those at risk for stopping treatment.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of the STatin Adverse Treatment Experience survey was to describe patients' experiences after reporting ≥1 recent statin-associated adverse event and identify opportunities to improve adherence and outcomes.
METHODS: The survey was developed in 3 stages: qualitative item development, pilot evaluation of initial item performance, and quantitative evaluation using a large commercial sample. Respondents with self-reported high cholesterol who had taken a statin in the past 2 years and experienced ≥1 statin-associated symptom in the past 6 months were included (N = 1500).
RESULTS: Mean age was 58 years, 40.3% were men, and 43.2% had tried ≥2 statins. Many had clinical comorbidities associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease (atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, 22.5%; diabetes, 25.8%; hypertension, 56.0%). The most important patient-reported reasons for continuing current statin therapy (n = 1168; 77.9%) were avoiding a heart attack or stroke, lowering cholesterol, and doctor recommendation. Being bothered by and not being able to tolerate side effects were the main reasons respondents discontinued statins (n = 332; 22.1%). Respondents who discontinued statins reported significantly higher mean Symptom Severity (10.6 vs 8.7, P < .001) and Impact Severity scores (11.8 vs 9.8, P < .001) compared with those who continued.
CONCLUSION: The STatin Adverse Treatment Experience survey highlights the importance of patients' adverse experiences with statins and how symptom and impact scores affect decisions to continue or discontinue therapy. These data provide a foundation to increase providers' awareness of statin tolerability from the patient's perspective and encourage benefit-risk discussions.

Keywords: Adherence; Adverse experience; Discontinuation of therapy; Hypercholesterolemia; Patient's perspective; Patient-reported outcomes; Shared decision-making; Statin therapy; Statin-associated symptoms; Symptom impact

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2019.04.011

Eur Heart J. 2019 May 23. pii: ehz299. [Epub ahead of print]

Effects of alirocumab on types of myocardial infarction: insights from the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial.

AIMS: The third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (MI) Task Force classified MIs into five types: Type 1, spontaneous; Type 2, related to oxygen supply/demand imbalance; Type 3, fatal without ascertainment of cardiac biomarkers; Type 4, related to percutaneous coronary intervention; and Type 5, related to coronary artery bypass surgery. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction with statins and proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors reduces risk of MI, but less is known about effects on types of MI. ODYSSEY OUTCOMES compared the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab with placebo in 18 924 patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and elevated LDL-C (≥1.8 mmol/L) despite intensive statin therapy. In a pre-specified analysis, we assessed the effects of alirocumab on types of MI.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Median follow-up was 2.8 years. Myocardial infarction types were prospectively adjudicated and classified. Of 1860 total MIs, 1223 (65.8%) were adjudicated as Type 1, 386 (20.8%) as Type 2, and 244 (13.1%) as Type 4. Few events were Type 3 (n = 2) or Type 5 (n = 5). Alirocumab reduced first MIs [hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-0.95; P = 0.003], with reductions in both Type 1 (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77-0.99; P = 0.032) and Type 2 (0.77, 0.61-0.97; P = 0.025), but not Type 4 MI.
CONCLUSION: After ACS, alirocumab added to intensive statin therapy favourably impacted on Type 1 and 2 MIs. The data indicate for the first time that a lipid-lowering therapy can attenuate the risk of Type 2 MI. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction below levels achievable with statins is an effective preventive strategy for both MI types.

Keywords: Alirocumab ; MI types ; Mortality; Prevention

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz299

Int J Cancer. 2019 May 21.

Statin use and risk of liver cancer: evidence from two population-based studies.

Kim Tu Tran, Úna C McMenamin, Helen G Coleman, Chris R Cardwell, Peter Murchie, Lisa Iversen, Amanda J Lee, Aaron P Thrift.

Epidemiological studies of statin use and liver cancer risk have produced conflicting results. We examined the association between statin use and risk of primary liver cancer in two large independent study populations taking account of important covariates and main indications of statins such as high cholesterol and chronic liver disease. We performed a nested case-control study within the Scottish Primary Care Clinical Informatics Unit (PCCIU) database. Five controls were matched to cases with primary liver cancer and we used conditional logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations with statin use. We also conducted a prospective cohort study within the UK Biobank using self-reported statin use and cancer-registry recorded primary liver cancer outcomes. Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. In the PCCIU case-control analysis, 434 liver cancer cases were matched to 2,103 controls. In the UK Biobank cohort, 182 out of 475,768 participants developed incident liver cancer. Statin use was associated with 39% lower risk of liver cancer in the PCCIU (adjusted OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43-0.87). When we examined specific subtypes of liver cancer in the UK Biobank, statin use was associated with lower risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (adjusted HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.24-0.94) but not intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma (IBDC) (adjusted HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.45-2.64). In conclusion, we found a consistent inverse relationship between statin use and risk of primary liver cancer which was only seen for HCC but not IBDC. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma; intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma; liver cancer; statins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32426

Int J Toxicol. 2019 May 21. 1091581819844793

Analysis of a Skeletal Muscle Injury and Drug Interactions in Lovastatin- and Fenofibrate-Coadministered Dogs.

Reo Kawata, Tsuyoshi Yokoi.

Because dogs are widely used in drug development as nonrodent experimental animals, using a dog model for drug-induced adverse reactions is considered to be relevant for an evaluation and investigation of a mechanism and a biomarker of clinical drug-induced adverse reactions. Skeletal muscle injury occurs by various drugs, including statins and fibrates, during drug development. However, there is almost no report of a dog model for drug-induced skeletal muscle injury. In the present study, we induced skeletal muscle injury in dogs by oral coadministration of lovastatin (LV) and fenofibrate (FF) for 4 weeks. Increases in plasma levels of creatine phosphokinase, myoglobin, miR-1, and miR-133a and degeneration/necrosis of myofibers in skeletal muscles but not in the heart were observed in LV- and FF-coadministered dogs. Plasma levels of lovastatin lactone and lovastatin acid were higher in LV- and FF-coadministered dogs than LV-administered dogs. Taken together, FF coadministration is considered to affect LV metabolism and result in skeletal muscle injury.

Keywords: dog; drug interaction; fenofibrate; lovastatin; skeletal muscle injury

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581819844793