bims-micesi Biomed News
on Mitotic cell signalling
Issue of 2022‒01‒09
five papers selected by
Valentina Piano
Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology


  1. J Cell Biol. 2022 Mar 07. pii: e202011085. [Epub ahead of print]221(3):
      Contractile ring constriction during cytokinesis is thought to compact central spindle microtubules to form the midbody, an antiparallel microtubule bundle at the intercellular bridge. In Caenorhabditis elegans, central spindle microtubule assembly requires targeting of the CLASP family protein CLS-2 to the kinetochores in metaphase and spindle midzone in anaphase. CLS-2 targeting is mediated by the CENP-F-like HCP-1/2, but their roles in cytokinesis and midbody assembly are not known. We found that although HCP-1 and HCP-2 mostly function cooperatively, HCP-1 plays a more primary role in promoting CLS-2-dependent central spindle microtubule assembly. HCP-1/2 codisrupted embryos did not form central spindles but completed cytokinesis and formed functional midbodies capable of supporting abscission. These central spindle-independent midbodies appeared to form via contractile ring constriction-driven bundling of astral microtubules at the furrow tip. This work suggests that, in the absence of a central spindle, astral microtubules can support midbody assembly and that midbody assembly is more predictive of successful cytokinesis than central spindle assembly.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202011085
  2. Chromosome Res. 2022 Jan 08.
      The kinetochore is essential for faithful chromosome segregation during mitosis and is assembled through dynamic processes involving numerous kinetochore proteins. Various experimental strategies have been used to understand kinetochore assembly processes. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis is also a useful strategy for revealing the dynamics of kinetochore assembly. In this study, we introduced fluorescence protein-tagged kinetochore protein cDNAs into each endogenous locus and performed FRAP analyses in chicken DT40 cells. Centromeric protein (CENP)-C was highly mobile in interphase, but immobile during mitosis. CENP-C mutants lacking the CENP-A-binding domain became mobile during mitosis. In contrast to CENP-C, CENP-T and CENP-H were immobile during both interphase and mitosis. The mobility of Dsn1, which is a component of the Mis12 complex and directly binds to CENP-C, depended on CENP-C mobility during mitosis. Thus, our FRAP assays provide dynamic aspects of how the kinetochore is assembled.
    Keywords:  CCAN; CENP-C; Kinetochore; Mis12 complex
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-021-09678-x
  3. Mol Biol Cell. 2022 Jan 05. mbcE21120610T
      Positioning organelles at the right place and time is critical for their function and inheritance. In budding yeast, mitochondrial and nuclear positioning require the anchoring of mitochondria and dynein to the cell cortex by clusters of Num1. We have previously shown that mitochondria drive the assembly of cortical Num1 clusters, which then serve as anchoring sites for mitochondria and dynein. When mitochondrial inheritance is inhibited, mitochondrial-driven assembly of Num1 in buds is disrupted and defects in dynein-mediated spindle positioning are observed. Using a structure-function approach to dissect the mechanism of mitochondria-dependent dynein anchoring, we found the EF hand-like motif (EFLM) of Num1 and its ability to bind calcium are required to bias dynein anchoring on mitochondria-associated Num1 clusters. Consistently, when the EFLM is disrupted, we no longer observe defects in dynein activity following inhibition of mitochondrial inheritance. Thus, the Num1 EFLM functions to bias dynein anchoring and activity in nuclear inheritance subsequent to mitochondrial inheritance. We hypothesize that this hierarchical integration of organelle positioning pathways by the Num1 EFLM contributes to the regulated order of organelle inheritance during the cell cycle.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E21-12-0610-T
  4. Protein Sci. 2022 Jan 05.
      Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) effect biological function despite their sequence-encoded lack of preference for stable three-dimensional structure. Among their many functions, IDPs form membraneless cellular compartments through liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), also termed biomolecular condensation. The extent to which LLPS has been evolutionarily selected remains largely unknown, as the complexities of IDP evolution hamper progress. Unlike structured proteins, rapid sequence divergence typical of IDPs confounds inference of their biophysical or biological functions from comparative sequence analyses. Here, we leverage mitosis as a universal eukaryotic feature to interrogate condensate evolutionary history. We observe that evolution has conserved the ability for six homologs of the mitotic IDP BuGZ to undergo LLPS and to serve the same mitotic function, despite low sequence conservation. We also observe that cellular context may tune LLPS. The phylogenetic correlation of LLPS and mitotic function in one protein raises the possibility of an ancient evolutionary interplay between LLPS and biological function, dating back at least 1.6 billion years to the last common ancestor of plants and animals. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Keywords:  Intrinsically disordered protein; LLPS; evolutionary conservation; mitotic spindle; phase separation; polyglutamine
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.4270
  5. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2022 Jan 03. pii: S1357-2725(21)00236-3. [Epub ahead of print] 106155
      Epigenetic dysregulation is an important contributor to carcinogenesis. This is not surprising, as chromatin-genomic DNA organized around structural histone scaffolding-serves as the template on which occurs essential nuclear processes, such as transcription, DNA replication and DNA repair. Histone H3 lysine 36 (H3K36) methyltransferases, such as the SET-domain 2 protein (SETD2), have emerged as critical tumor suppressors. Previous work on mammalian SETD2 and its counterpart in model organisms, Set2, has highlighted the role of this protein in governing genomic stability through transcriptional elongation and splicing, as well as in DNA damage response processes and cell cycle progression. A compendium of SETD2 mutations have been documented, garnered from sequenced cancer patient genome data, and these findings underscore the cancer-driving properties of SETD2 loss-of-function. In this review, we consolidate the molecular mechanisms regulated by SETD2/Set2 and discuss evidence of its dysregulation in tumorigenesis. Insight into the genetic interactions that exist between SETD2 and various canonical intracellular signaling pathways has not only empowered pharmacological intervention by taking advantage of synthetic lethality but underscores SETD2 as a druggable target for precision cancer therapy.
    Keywords:  DNA damage response; Histone H3K36 methylation; SETD2; Set2; chromatin; epigenetics
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2021.106155