bims-mesote Biomed News
on Mesothelioma
Issue of 2021–09–26
five papers selected by
Laura Mannarino, Humanitas Research



  1. Cureus. 2021 Aug;13(8): e17199
      Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a highly aggressive malignant tumor that arises from mesothelial cells of pleural cavity. The main risk factor for MPM is asbestos exposure with most cases discovered in elderly males after a long latency period. However, here we report a rare case of MPM diagnosed in a healthy young male patient without significant asbestos exposure. We report the case of an otherwise healthy 47-year-old male who presented with one week of exertional dyspnea and chest pain. Chest X-ray showed unilateral large pleural effusion. Chest CT scan revealed confluent right hilar mass and pleural thickening. Pleural fluid analysis showed exudative features. Cytology was negative for malignant cells. Core tissue biopsy showed features of epithelioid mesothelioma. Although most cases of MPM have been reported in elderly male patients with significant asbestos exposure, more research is needed to explain the pathogenesis of MPM in young patients without asbestos exposure.
    Keywords:  asbestos; epithelioid mesothelioma; malignant pleural effusion; malignant pleural mesothelioma; mpm
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17199
  2. Cureus. 2021 Aug;13(8): e17263
      We report a diagnostically challenging case of a 77-year-old man who presented with shortness of breath and was found to have a large right hydropneumothorax with collapse of the right lung. A malignancy was suspected, but pleural fluid cytology and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT imaging were negative. He then underwent video-assisted thoracoscopy with biopsies of the pleura and chest wall which revealed malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Older patients with early stage MPM are more likely to have false-negative FDG PET/CT results. Pleural biopsy is essential when there is clinical suspicion for mesothelioma, even with negative initial FDG PET imaging.
    Keywords:  false-negative; malignant pleural mesothelioma; pet/ct; pleural biopsy; pleural effusion
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17263
  3. Epidemiol Prev. 2021 Jul-Aug;45(4):45(4): 289-295
      Pleural mesothelioma clusters from outdoor environmental exposure have been highlighted also in Italy and, on the basis of epidemiological surveillance coordinated by the Italian National Mesothelioma Register, their frequency has been estimated at about 4.5%. Epidemiological studies and evaluations of some regional mesothelioma registers have made it possible to highlight that the dispersion of asbestos fibers in the outdoor environment was the only ascertained cause of mesothelioma in subjects from asbestos-cement factories, from the Balangero mine (Piedmont Region), from some serpentine rock quarries with tremolite outcrops in the Southern Apennines and in Alta Val di Susa (Piedmont Region); from chrysotile and serpentine caves in Valmalenco (Lombardy Region). Furthermore, cases of pleural mesothelioma were clearly caused by environmental pollution from fluoroedenite fibers in Biancavilla (Sicily Region). On the other hand, regional mesothelioma registers have also reported other circumstances of environmental asbestos exposure, like in the case of steel industry, shipbuilding, chemical plants, railway lines, and repair/demolition of railway carriages. However, these reports have not found confirmation on the basis of ad-hoc studies and it is likely that there is a lack of homogeneity in the assessment of individual cases. Apart from the scenarios which have been the subject of ad-hoc studies, the assessment of the causal role of environmental exposure to "in place" asbestos in the onset of pleural mesothelioma is problematic without an effort to more carefully examine the circumstances of possible exposure, harmonization of the attribution criteria used in the individual regional registers, analytical assessment of the impact of such exposure on the risk of onset of mesothelioma.
    Keywords:  Asbestos; Outdoor environmental exposure; Pleural malignant mesothelioma
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.19191/EP21.4.P289.085
  4. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2021 Sep 24. 22 355-367
      Success in solid tumor chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy requires overcoming several barriers, including lung sequestration, inefficient accumulation within the tumor, and target-antigen heterogeneity. Understanding CAR T-cell kinetics can assist in the interpretation of therapy response and limitations and thereby facilitate developing successful strategies to treat solid tumors. As T-cell therapy response varies across metastatic sites, the assessment of CAR T-cell kinetics by peripheral blood analysis or a single-site tumor biopsy is inadequate for interpretation of therapy response. The use of tumor imaging alone has also proven to be insufficient to interpret response to therapy. To address these limitations, we conducted dual tumor and T-cell imaging by use of a bioluminescent reporter and positron emission tomography in clinically relevant mouse models of pleural mesothelioma and non-small cell lung cancer. We observed that the mode of delivery of T cells (systemic versus regional), T-cell activation status (presence or absence of antigen-expressing tumor), and tumor-antigen expression heterogeneity influence T-cell kinetics. The observations from our study underscore the need to identify and develop a T-cell reporter-in addition to standard parameters of tumor imaging and antitumor efficacy-that can be used for repeat imaging without compromising the efficacy of CAR T cells in vivo.
    Keywords:  CAR T cells; PET-CT; cell therapy; gene therapy; imaging reporter; immunotherapy; immunotherapy kinetics; in vivo imaging; lung cancer; mesothelioma; noninvasive immunotherapy imaging
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omto.2021.06.006