bims-humivi Biomed News
on Human mito-nuclear genetic interplay
Issue of 2026–02–01
one paper selected by
Mariangela Santorsola, Università di Pavia



  1. Front Bioinform. 2025 ;5 1704212
      Despite the growing availability of nuclear genomic data, mitochondrial genes remain the most widely used molecular markers in mammalian systematics. However, a quantitative assessment of the phylogenetic information content of mitochondrial loci compared to nuclear loci has never been carried out. Here, we apply a sparse learning approach based on Lasso regression to evaluate the contribution of alignment sites to phylogenetic likelihoods, providing the first estimates of phylogenetically effective lengths for markers commonly used in mammalian systematics. Analyzing more than 30,000 complete mammalian mitochondrial genomes and nuclear panels composed of either 100 randomly selected complete coding sequences or of partial gene segments from conventional markers, we examined phylogenetic informativeness at two taxonomic levels: within-species and among-species. On average, ∼32% of mitochondrial sites and ∼38% of nuclear sites were classified as phylogenetically informative. We found that the number of phylogenetically informative sites were positively correlated with total gene length. Therefore, longer mitochondrial genes, particularly ND5, COX1, and CYTB, harbored the largest numbers of informative sites. Although nuclear coding sequences contained, on average, more informative sites, mitochondrial genes also yielded consistent resolution of among-species relationships. Overall, our results provide the first large-scale, quantitative comparison of phylogenetic information content across mammalian mitochondrial and nuclear genes, offering a principled framework for marker selection in future systematics studies that can be broadly applied to any lineage.
    Keywords:  Lasso regression; mitochondrial genome; molecular taxonomy; phylogenetic informativeness; phylogenetic signal; sparse learning; species delimitation
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fbinf.2025.1704212