bims-hemali Biomed News
on Hematologic malignancies
Issue of 2026–06–07
seventeen papers selected by
Alexandros Alexandropoulos, Γενικό Νοσοκομείο Αθηνών Λαϊκό



  1. Blood Adv. 2026 Jun 03. pii: bloodadvances.2026019937. [Epub ahead of print]
      In the phase 3 CEPHEUS study, daratumumab plus bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (D‑VRd) increased overall MRD-negativity rates versus VRd in transplant-ineligible/transplant-deferred patients with NDMM. We present an expanded MRD analysis of CEPHEUS. Patients who were transplant-ineligible, or deferred transplant as initial therapy, were randomized 1:1 to receive D-VRd or VRd. Overall MRD negativity (NGS) was defined as the proportion of patients achieving ≥CR and MRD-negative status assessed at 10-5 (primary endpoint) and 10-6 thresholds. A total of 395 patients were randomized (D-VRd, n=197; VRd, n=198). With 58.7-months median follow-up, overall MRD-negativity rates were significantly higher with D-VRd versus VRd (10-5, 60.9% vs 39.4%; OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.58-3.55; 10-6, 46.2% vs 27.3%; OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.48-3.40; P<0.0001 and P=0.0001, respectively). Sustained MRD negativity (≥12 months) was also significantly higher with D-VRd versus VRd (10-5: 49.2% vs 27.3%; 10-6: 34.0% vs 16.2%; each P<0.0001), with similar benefits at ≥24 and ≥36 months. MRD-negativity rates were higher at all pre-specified timepoints, and cumulatively, with D-VRd versus VRd (10-5 and 10-6). Among patients who achieved MRD negativity, PFS trended in favor of D-VRd versus VRd (10-5, HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.35-1.06; P=0.0755; 10-6, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.31-1.41; P=0.2811). Responses with D-VRd are deeper and more durable versus VRd, increasing overall, sustained, and landmark MRD-negativity rates, translating into improved overall PFS for patients treated with D-VRd versus VRd (intent-to-treat), with the potential to improve PFS even among patients who achieve MRD negativity. D-VRd is therefore a new standard-of-care treatment for transplant-ineligible/transplant-deferred NDMM. Registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03652064.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2026019937
  2. Blood. 2026 Jun 02. pii: blood.2026034043. [Epub ahead of print]
      Ziftomenib - a potent, selective, oral menin inhibitor - is approved as monotherapy for adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (NPM1-m AML). The KOMET-007 phase 1 trial investigated clinical activity and tolerability of ziftomenib in combination with standard therapies for R/R and newly diagnosed AML. Here, we report outcomes of adults with R/R NPM1-m AML treated with ziftomenib plus venetoclax/azacitidine. In phase 1a, patients received ziftomenib 200, 400, or 600 mg once daily with standard doses of venetoclax/azacitidine. In phase 1b, ziftomenib 600 mg was selected for expansion. Sixty-seven patients were treated (27 phase 1a; 40 phase 1b). Median age was 66 years, and 55% were men. Median number of prior therapies was 1 (range 1-8); 55% received prior venetoclax and 22% had prior transplantation. Most common (≥20%) grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were leukopenia (34%), thrombocytopenia (28%), febrile neutropenia and neutropenia (25% each). Six patients developed QTc prolongation (1 ziftomenib-related; grade 1), and 2 experienced differentiation syndrome (grade 3); all events were successfully managed. In patients receiving ziftomenib 600 mg, composite complete remission (CRc) rate was 46% (22/48), with 67% (12/18) achieving central measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity (<0.01% threshold). In venetoclax-naïve and -exposed patients, CRc rates were 70% (16/23) and 24% (6/25), with MRD-negativity rates of 75% (9/12) and 50% (3/6), respectively. Median duration of response was 8.6 months, and median overall survival was not reached. The combination of ziftomenib 600 mg with venetoclax/azacitidine was well tolerated with deep and durable clinical activity in R/R NPM1-m AML. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT05735184.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2026034043
  3. Blood Adv. 2026 Jun 04. pii: bloodadvances.2026020265. [Epub ahead of print]
      Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a severe hyperinflammatory syndrome characterized by excessive immune cell activation and hypersecretion of inflammatory cytokines, many of which signal via the Janus kinases (JAKs). Preclinical studies have demonstrated that the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib ameliorates disease manifestations and prolongs survival in mouse models of HLH. Similarly, clinical studies have suggested that ruxolitinib is safe and effective for children with HLH, although prospective trials evaluating optimal ruxolitinib doses in primary (i.e., inherited/genetic) HLH are lacking. To address this gap, we developed HLHRUXO (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04551131), a prospective multi-institutional clinical trial utilizing a ruxolitinib-containing regimen in children with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory HLH. Patients received ruxolitinib 25 mg/m2 twice daily combined with dexamethasone, with or without etoposide, for eight weeks, followed by continuation therapy at the discretion of the treating physician. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on days one and eight. Eight patients (average age 7.6 years; five primary HLH [pHLH] and three secondary HLH [sHLH]) completed the study; none experienced dose-limiting adverse events (AEs). All patients experienced a favorable response at one week, demonstrating clinical stabilization and improvement in serum ferritin levels. Further, all five patients (three pHLH, two sHLH) with newly diagnosed HLH achieved a complete response (CR) after eight weeks of treatment, and all were alive at one year. One patient with relapsed/refractory sHLH achieved a CR at eight weeks and was alive at one year, while two others with relapsed/refractory pHLH died. Our findings confirm the safety of this ruxolitinib-containing regimen for pediatric HLH, with the best results observed in patients with newly diagnosed disease. Further studies of ruxolitinib as frontline therapy for children with HLH are warranted.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2026020265
  4. N Engl J Med. 2026 Jun 04. 394(21): 2107-2116
       BACKGROUND: For patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are 75 years of age or older or who are ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy, azacitidine or decitabine plus venetoclax is the standard of care, but parenteral administration imposes a burden on patients and providers. Oral decitabine-cedazuridine, approved in Europe for AML, has pharmacokinetic properties equivalent to those of intravenous decitabine but provides limited survival benefit as monotherapy.
    METHODS: In this phase 1-2, open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized trial, we assigned patients with newly diagnosed AML who were 75 years of age or older or who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy to receive oral decitabine-cedazuridine plus oral venetoclax. To mitigate myelosuppression observed in phase 1, schedule adjustments were encouraged in phase 2b after bone marrow blast clearance. The primary end points were the venetoclax area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours and maximum observed concentration with or without decitabine-cedazuridine (measures of drug interaction) on days 5 and 15 of cycle 2 (phase 1-2a) and complete response (phase 2a-b).
    RESULTS: A total of 189 patients were enrolled (30 patients in phase 1, 58 patients in phase 2a, and 101 patients in phase 2b). No drug-drug interactions were observed between decitabine-cedazuridine and venetoclax. In the pivotal phase 2b, the percentage of patients with a complete response was 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36 to 57), the percentage with a complete response or complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery was 63% (95% CI, 53 to 73), and median overall survival was 15.5 months (95% CI, 7.6 to could not be estimated). Common adverse events of grade 3 or higher in phase 2b were anemia (in 30% of the patients), neutropenia (in 26%), and febrile neutropenia (in 25%). Mortality was 3% at 30 days and 10% at 60 days.
    CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with newly diagnosed AML who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, all-oral decitabine-cedazuridine plus venetoclax caused no drug interactions and resulted in a complete response in nearly half the patients, with myelosuppressive effects. (Funded by Taiho Oncology; ASCERTAIN-V ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04657081.).
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2510223
  5. Lancet. 2026 May 30. pii: S0140-6736(26)01069-X. [Epub ahead of print]
      
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(26)01069-X
  6. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2026 Jun 06.
      Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) often report muscle complaints (MC). Strategies to prevent or attenuate these muscle complaints remain enigmatic as the underlying mechanism is unclear, although a central role for mitochondria is proposed. We investigated the effects of TKIs on cellular metabolism in muscle biopsies of CML patients (n = 20), compared with healthy controls (n = 10) and whether these changes may be linked to muscle complaints. C2C12 myotubes were used to further explore the effects of TKIs on muscle metabolism in vitro. We found that TKI muscle concentrations in CML patients aligned with the concentrations at which cytotoxicity could be observed in C2C12 myotubes, and that muscle to plasma ratios tended to correlate with the degree of MC in CML patients. In C2C12 myotubes, acute TKI incubation of C2C12 myotubes resulted in alterations in energy metabolism, showing a shift from glycolysis to oxidative phosphorylation. CML patients without MC showed higher oxidative capacity, characterized by higher mitochondrial complex activities in skeletal muscle and occurrence of the first ventilatory threshold at a higher percentage of peak oxygen uptake during maximal exercise compared to patients with MC. Taken together, these observations raise the possibility that TKIs may affect cellular energy metabolism and may contribute to muscle complaints.Trial registration The Netherlands Trial Registry identifier NTR6373.
    Keywords:  Chronic myeloid leukemia; Energy metabolism; Mitochondrial function; Muscle complaints; Tyrosine kinase inhibitors
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-026-06287-6
  7. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2026 May 19. pii: S2152-2650(26)00146-1. [Epub ahead of print]
      Early-stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is characterized by high cure rates, with current treatment paradigms focused on personalizing therapy to balance disease control with the avoidance of long-term toxicity. Established response-adapted approaches utilize interim positron emission tomography to guide the intensity of standard doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine-based chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy (RT). Improved response rates in advanced stage cHL with brentuximab vedotin (BV), pembrolizumab, and nivolumab have prompted the investigation of these novel agents in early stage cHL. Recent phase II clinical trials such as BREACH and NIVAHL, both including RT, demonstrate that integrating BV or nivolumab into combined modality therapy yields outstanding interim complete response rates and progression-free survival. Other small studies exploring the omission of RT have shown that BV-based regimens alone yield 2-year progression-free survival rates ranging from 91% to 97%. Emerging strategies are evaluating the role of novel agents as consolidation therapy or in immunotherapy-only induction to further reduce cytotoxic exposure. These promising outcomes need validation from ongoing randomized phase III trials such as RADAR and AHOD 2131. Refined risk stratification through emerging biomarkers including circulating tumor DNA and total metabolic tumor volume may help identify high risk patients who will most benefit from novel agents, individualizing therapy, and optimizing global access.
    Keywords:  Brentuximab vedotin; Combined modality therapy; Nivolumab; Pembrolizumab; Response adapted therapy
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2026.05.003
  8. Blood Neoplasia. 2026 Aug;3(3): 100236
      Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematological malignancy with various molecular and cytogenetic subtypes. Treatment options for older adult patients are limited due to high toxicity of conventional chemotherapy. The B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 2 inhibitor venetoclax is effective in combination with hypomethylating agents or low-dose cytarabine, but ∼30% of patients do not respond to the initial combination treatment. Thus, alternative combinations are needed to sensitize AML cells to venetoclax and overcome resistance mechanisms. Here, we report that targeting histone lysine-specific demethylases induces a ferroptosis-like phenotype driven by oxidative stress in various AML subtypes. In both patient samples and cell lines, JIB-04 increases the level of reactive oxygen species, ferrous iron, and lipid peroxidation, all signs of ferroptosis. The combination of JIB-04 and venetoclax proved to be highly synergistic. Blocking the JIB-04-induced phenotype by using the antioxidant N-acetyl-l-cysteine reverses the synergistic killing. At the molecular level, the ferroptosis inducers HMOX1, SAT1, and PTGS2 were found to be upregulated by JIB-04. Collectively, these findings identify JIB-04 as a potential new ferroptosis inducer in AML and highlight the potential of oxidative stress induction as a valuable strategy in combination with venetoclax to treat AML.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bneo.2026.100236
  9. Biomark Res. 2026 May 30. pii: 56. [Epub ahead of print]14(1):
      Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare malignant lymphoid condition that arises within the central nervous system, which is considered an immune-privileged site. Outcomes for patients with PCNSL have substantially improved over the past decade, largely due to treatment intensification. In recent years, it has become increasingly evident that the biology of PCNSL is not solely determined by the tumor itself, but also by its close and complex interaction with the immune microenvironment. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor-associated macrophages, and dendritic cells, in particular, reshape the immune milieu in PCNSL. Notably, an immunosuppressive microenvironment characterized by a high concentration of M2-like macrophages, a low concentration of CD8+ T-cells, and high expression of the cytokine IL-10 is associated with an unfavorable survival. Conversely, T-cell immunity and its abundance are pivotal for favorable treatment outcomes, highlighting the prognostic importance of immune competence within the central nervous system. The current standard of care for induction treatment is based on high-dose methotrexate as the central component, followed by consolidating high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in eligible patients. Long-term follow-up data from the IELSG32 and PRECISE trials demonstrated that up to 70% of patients remained alive at seven years, underscoring the curative potential of these strategies. Eligibility mainly depends on performance status, which is recognized as a key prognostic factor in standard risk stratifications. Nevertheless, relapse rates remain substantial, prompting growing interest in immunotherapeutic strategies. T-cell-based approaches, including among others checkpoint inhibitors, T-cell engagers, and CAR T-cells have achieved encouraging therapeutic success. However, the immune-privileged nature of the central nervous system poses immunological challenges that limit immune surveillance and facilitate tumor cell evasion, creating therapeutic obstacles in PCNSL. A comprehensive understanding of the manner in which alterations in oncogenic signaling influence immune evasion strategies holds considerable potential for enhancing future therapeutic approaches in PCNSL. Despite compelling evidence that the immune microenvironment significantly influences disease progression, established prognostic models for PCNSL do not yet consider inflammatory or immunological biomarkers. Given the significant prognostic and therapeutic implications of the immune microenvironment, its impact should be reflected and validated in future standard risk stratifications. Integrating validated immune biomarkers with emerging immunotherapeutic strategies has the potential not only to improve individual patient outcomes but also to optimize the overall structure of care for patients with PCNSL.
    Keywords:  Immune evasion; Immune microenvironment; Immunotherapy; Primary CNS lymphoma; Prognostic scoring; T-cell immunity
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-026-00945-9
  10. Front Immunol. 2026 ;17 1757010
      Most patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) can achieve long-term survival with frontline combination chemotherapy and radiation therapy, but approximately 10%-30% of patients will develop relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) combined with brentuximab vedotin (BV) maintenance therapy improves patient prognosis. However, the management of relapse after ASCT remains a challenge. This report presents a case of a patient with relapsed cHL after ASCT who was successfully treated with targeted therapy combined with two epigenetic modulators. A 26-year-old male patient was diagnosed with stage IIA cHL and received five-line treatment, including ABVD, GemOx-D, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies, anti-CD47/PD-L1 bispecific antibodies, and BV combined with ICE, ultimately achieving first complete remission (CR). The patient subsequently underwent peripheral blood ASCT and BV maintenance therapy. However, 16 months post transplantation, disease relapse was detected on follow-up PET/CT scan. The patient subsequently received 6 cycles of the Ven-Chi-Dec regimen (venetoclax combined with chidamide and decitabine), achieving complete metabolic remission (CMR) with no significant adverse effects. This case report suggests that the Ven-Chi-Dec regimen may be a potential treatment for patients with R/R cHL after ASCT, although further studies are needed to validate its efficacy.
    Keywords:  Bcl-2 inhibitor (Venetoclax); CHL; demethylation (decitabine); epigenetic regulation; histone deacetylase inhibitor (chidamide); relapsed/refractory; targeted therapy
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1757010
  11. Front Oncol. 2026 ;16 1851781
      Myelofibrosis (MF) is a Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by progressive bone marrow fibrosis, constitutional symptoms, cytopenias, and splenomegaly. Splenic enlargement, driven primarily by extramedullary hematopoiesis, represents a hallmark of MF and contributes substantially to symptom burden, portal hypertension, and worsening cytopenias through splenic sequestration. The identification of constitutive Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway activation as the central pathogenic mechanism in myeloproliferative neoplasms led to the development of JAK inhibitors, which have become the cornerstone of therapy for spleen volume reduction and symptom amelioration. Four JAK inhibitors-ruxolitinib, fedratinib, pacritinib, and momelotinib-are currently approved by regulatory agencies, each exhibiting distinct pharmacological profiles suited to different clinical phenotypes. Ruxolitinib remains the first-line standard for patients with adequate platelet counts, pacritinib is preferred in severe thrombocytopenia, and momelotinib is the agent of choice in anemia-dominant disease. Fedratinib serves as an effective second-line option following ruxolitinib failure. Emerging combination strategies, including pelabresib plus ruxolitinib and navitoclax plus ruxolitinib, have demonstrated superior spleen volume reduction in phase III trials and represent a promising therapeutic frontier. Conventional agents such as hydroxyurea and immunomodulatory drugs retain a role in select patients. Non-pharmacologic interventions-including splenectomy, splenic irradiation, partial splenic artery embolization, and radiofrequency ablation-remain valuable for patients refractory to or ineligible for medical therapy. This review provides a comprehensive and updated overview of the management of splenomegaly in MF, integrating all four approved JAK inhibitors, emerging combination therapies, peri-transplant considerations, and procedural approaches, and proposes a practical phenotype-driven treatment framework.
    Keywords:  JAK inhibitors; combination therapy; fedratinib; momelotinib; myelofibrosis; pacritinib; ruxolitinib; splenomegaly
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1851781
  12. J Clin Oncol. 2026 Jun 02. 101200JCO2601080
    SENTRY Trial Investigators
       PURPOSE: Ruxolitinib improves splenomegaly and symptoms in myelofibrosis but lacks reliable clonal burden reduction. Selinexor, an oral inhibitor of exportin 1, has demonstrated activity in myelofibrosis. We evaluated selinexor plus ruxolitinib versus ruxolitinib alone in JAK inhibitor-naïve myelofibrosis.
    PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this double-blind, phase 3 trial, patients were randomized (2:1) to receive selinexor plus ruxolitinib or placebo plus ruxolitinib. Co-primary endpoints were spleen volume reduction ≥35% (SVR35) and absolute mean change in total symptom score (AbsTSS; excluding fatigue) from baseline to Week 24.
    RESULTS: 353 patients were randomized. At Week 24, SVR35 was achieved in 49.8% of the selinexor plus ruxolitinib group versus 28.0% of the placebo plus ruxolitinib group (difference, 21.8 percentage points; odds ratio, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.60 to 4.17; P<0.0001). Differences were evident by Week 12 and through Week 36. The AbsTSS co-primary endpoint was not met; however, symptom scores improved from baseline in both groups (-9.9 selinexor plus ruxolitinib, -10.9 placebo plus ruxolitinib), with no significant between-group difference.At median follow-up of ∼12 months, the overall survival (OS) hazard ratio was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.19 to 1.00; nominal P=0.022).Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 70.1% and 50.0% of patients in the selinexor plus ruxolitinib or placebo plus ruxolitinib groups, respectively, most commonly anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. Nausea was more frequent with selinexor but predominantly low-grade and early.
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients with JAK inhibitor-naïve myelofibrosis, selinexor plus ruxolitinib met its co-primary endpoint of improved SVR35 but did not meet the AbsTSS co-primary endpoint, compared with placebo plus ruxolitinib. An early OS difference was observed. The safety profile was consistent with known adverse event profiles of the individual agents.
    TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.Gov: NCT04562389; EudraCT: 2020-003883-19.
    Keywords:  Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Myelofibrosis; Ruxolitinib; Selinexor; Spleen
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-26-01080