bims-hafaim Biomed News
on Heart failure metabolism
Issue of 2022–01–30
four papers selected by
Kyle McCommis, Saint Louis University



  1. Physiol Genomics. 2022 Jan 24.
      Increased levels of oxidative stress have been found with heart failure. Whether failing hearts express antioxidant and detoxification enzymes have not been addressed systematically. Nrf2 gene encodes a transcription factor that regulates the expression of antioxidant and detoxification genes. Using RNA-seq dataset from explanted hearts of 37 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), 13 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), and 14 non-failure (NF) donors as a control, we addressed whether failing hearts change the expression of Nrf2, its negative regulator Keap1, and antioxidant or detoxification genes. Significant increases in the ratio of Nrf2 to Keap1 were found to associate with DCM or ICM. Antioxidant genes showed decreased expression in both types of heart failure, including NQO1, SOD1, GPX3, GPX4, GSR, PRDX1, and TXNRD1. Detoxification enzymes, GCLM and EPHX1, also showed decreased expression, whereas the CYP1B1 transcript was elevated in both DCM and ICM. The genes encoding metal binding protein ferritin were decreased whereas 5 out of 12 metallothionein genes showed elevated expression. Our finding on Nrf2 gene expression has been validated by meta-analysis of 7 independent datasets of microarray or RNA-seq for differential gene expression in DCM and ICM from NF controls. In conclusion, minor elevation of Nrf2 gene expression is not coupled to increases in antioxidant and detoxification genes, supporting an impairment of Nrf2 signaling in patients with heart failure. Decreases in multiple antioxidant and detoxification genes are consistent with the observed increases of oxidative stress in failing hearts.
    Keywords:  RNA-seq; gene expression; heart failure; oxidative stress; transcription factor
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00079.2021
  2. Diabetes Ther. 2022 Jan 27.
      Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a condition with increasing disease burden. Prevalence of HFpEF is increasing, reflecting an increasingly elderly and comorbid population, as well as reinforcing the need for more treatments for this disease. The pathophysiology of HFpEF is complex. Some inflammatory processes seen in HFpEF are shared with diabetes mellitus (DM) and there is an association seen between the two conditions. It is therefore no wonder that treatments for diabetes may have some effect on heart failure outcomes. Current treatment strategies in HFpEF are limited, with treatments focusing on symptom control rather than morbidity or mortality benefit. However, there are now promising results from the EMPEROR-Preserved study that show significantly reduced cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for heart failure (HHF) in patients taking empagliflozin, compared to those taking placebo. These results indicate a promising future for sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in HFpEF. The ongoing DELIVER trial (investigating the use of dapagliflozin in HFpEF) is awaited but could provide further evidence of support for SGLT2 inhibitors in HFpEF. With hospital admissions for HFpEF increasing in the UK, the economic impact of treatments that reduce HHF is vast. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recently added SGLT2 inhibitors to their guidelines for treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) following DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced trials and we suggest that similar changes be made to guidelines to support the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in the management of HFpEF in upcoming months.
    Keywords:  Diagnosis; Empagliflozin; HFpEF; Heart failure; Pathophysiology; SGLT2 inhibitor; Treatment
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-022-01204-4
  3. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Jan 26. 22(1): 17
       BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of Resveratrol (RSV) in rats with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).
    METHODS: Porcine cardiac myosin was used to set up rat model with DCM. RSV (10 mg/kg in RSV-L group and 50 mg/kg in RSV-H group) or vehicle was administered to rats with DCM once daily from the 28th day till the 90th day after the first immunization. Cardiac function of rats was evaluated by echocardiographic analysis. The deposition of fibrous tissues in the hearts was evaluated by Masson and picrosirius red staining. The mRNA levels of collagen type I (Col I), collagen type III (Col III) and silence information regulator 1 (Sirt1) were measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The interaction of Sirt1 with Smad3 was revealed by coimmunoprecipitation.
    RESULTS: The heart weight, heart weight/body weight ratio, left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and left ventricular end systolic diameter (LVESD) were significantly increased in rats with DCM, and attenuated by RSV. RSV also positively decreased fibrosis, and the expression of Col I and Col III in the myocardium. The Sirt1 mRNA was significantly decreased in myosin-immunized hearts and was positively increased by RSV. The Sirt1 combined with Smad3 directly. Acetylation of Smad3 (Ac-Smad3) was significantly increased in DCM and was markedly decreased by RSV.
    CONCLUSION: RSV effectively ameliorated myocardial fibrosis and improved cardiac function by regulating Sirt1/Smad3 deacetylation pathway in rat model with DCM.
    Keywords:  Dilated cardiomyopathy; Fibrosis; Resveratrol; Sirt1; Smad3
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02401-y
  4. Health Technol Assess. 2022 Jan;26(4): 1-128
       BACKGROUND: Chronic heart failure is a debilitating condition that accounts for an annual NHS spend of £2.3B. Low levels of endogenous coenzyme Q10 may exacerbate chronic heart failure. Coenzyme Q10 supplements might improve symptoms and slow progression. As statins are thought to block the production of coenzyme Q10, supplementation might be particularly beneficial for patients taking statins.
    OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of coenzyme Q10 in managing chronic heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction.
    METHODS: A systematic review that included randomised trials comparing coenzyme Q10 plus standard care with standard care alone in chronic heart failure. Trials restricted to chronic heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction were excluded. Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched up to March 2020. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (version 5.2). A planned individual participant data meta-analysis was not possible and meta-analyses were mostly based on aggregate data from publications. Potential effect modification was examined using meta-regression. A Markov model used treatment effects from the meta-analysis and baseline mortality and hospitalisation from an observational UK cohort. Costs were evaluated from an NHS and Personal Social Services perspective and expressed in Great British pounds at a 2019/20 price base. Outcomes were expressed in quality-adjusted life-years. Both costs and outcomes were discounted at a 3.5% annual rate.
    RESULTS: A total of 26 trials, comprising 2250 participants, were included in the systematic review. Many trials were reported poorly and were rated as having a high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain. Meta-analysis suggested a possible benefit of coenzyme Q10 on all-cause mortality (seven trials, 1371 participants; relative risk 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 1.03). The results for short-term functional outcomes were more modest or unclear. There was no indication of increased adverse events with coenzyme Q10. Meta-regression found no evidence of treatment interaction with statins. The base-case cost-effectiveness analysis produced incremental costs of £4878, incremental quality-adjusted life-years of 1.34 and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £3650. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that at thresholds of £20,000 and £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year coenzyme Q10 had a high probability (95.2% and 95.8%, respectively) of being more cost-effective than standard care alone. Scenario analyses in which the population and other model assumptions were varied all found coenzyme Q10 to be cost-effective. The expected value of perfect information suggested that a new trial could be valuable.
    LIMITATIONS: For most outcomes, data were available from few trials and different trials contributed to different outcomes. There were concerns about risk of bias and whether or not the results from included trials were applicable to a typical UK population. A lack of individual participant data meant that planned detailed analyses of effect modifiers were not possible.
    CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence suggested that, if prescribed, coenzyme Q10 has the potential to be clinically effective and cost-effective for heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. However, given important concerns about risk of bias, plausibility of effect sizes and applicability of the evidence base, establishing whether or not coenzyme Q10 is genuinely effective in a typical UK population is important, particularly as coenzyme Q10 has not been subject to the scrutiny of drug-licensing processes. Stronger evidence is needed before considering its prescription in the NHS.
    FUTURE WORK: A new independent, well-designed clinical trial of coenzyme Q10 in a typical UK heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction population may be warranted.
    STUDY REGISTRATION: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018106189.
    FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 4. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
    Keywords:  COENZYME Q10; COST–BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; HEART FAILURE; META-ANALYSIS; MICRONUTRIENTS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UBIQUINONE; VALUE OF INFORMATION ANALYSIS; VITAMINS
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3310/KVOU6959