J Diabetes Complications. 2025 Jul 24. pii: S1056-8727(25)00193-X. [Epub ahead of print]39(10): 109140
AIMS: Effective glycemic control is essential for preventing complications and improving quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Identifying reliable glycemic indicators for the assessment of islet function and renal complications remains a major challenge in diabetology. Time in Range (TIR) and Glycemia Risk Index (GRI), two continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-based metrics, have recently emerged as potential tools for assessing glycemic control beyond HbA1c. This study aims to assess the predictive value of TIR and GRI for islet function impairment and diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in patients with T2DM.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a total of 422 patients with T2DM was performed, who were admitted to Zhuhai People's Hospital between January 2021 and December 2022. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data were collected to get TIR and GRI. Additionally, the C-peptide release, random urine biochemistry analysis, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were obtained to calculate HOMA-IR, HOMA-β, ISIstumvoll index, Stumvoll 1-phase and 2-phase index, and insulin resistance. The Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (UACR) was ascertained as a diagnostic marker of DKD.
RESULTS: TIR and GRI demonstrated significant correlations with HOMA-IR, HOMA-β, and UACR; however, CRP exhibited a limited correlation with HOMA-IR and UACR. After adjustment for potential confounding factors, the odds ratios (ORs) for pancreatic β-cell function were: TIR 0.174 (95 % CI 0.051-0.592), GRI 1.010 (95 % CI 1.001-1.020). For DKD: TIR 0.182 (95 % CI 0.052-0.639), GRI 1.017 (95 % CI 1.007-1.027). TIR levels of 71 %-85 % and 41 %-70 % were associated with a 4.763-fold and 5.079-fold higher risk of insulin resistance, respectively, compared with TIR > 85 %. Similarly, GRI levels of 21-30, 31-45, and 46-100 were associated with 2.553-fold, 2.597-fold, and 3.394-fold increases in insulin resistance risk compared with GRI ≤20. Despite excluding CRP, TIR and GRI differences in DKD and islet function were significant (P < 0.05). In the regression analysis of DKD and islet function, excluding the CRP, TIR and GRI groups, the differences remained statistically significant (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: TIR was identified as a protective factor for pancreatic β-cell function, while GRI was associated with an increased risk of dysfunction. Furthermore, longer disease duration, higher HbA1c, elevated BMI, high GRI, and low TIR were associated with increased insulin resistance. A higher GRI and lower TIR also contributed to an elevated risk of DKD.
Keywords: Diabetic kidney disease; Glycemia risk index; Insulin resistance; Pancreatic β-cell function; Time in range