Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2023 Dec 27.
Mikkel Oxfeldt,
Daniel Marsi,
Peter M Christensen,
Ole Emil Andersen,
Frank Ted Johansen,
Maj Bangshaab,
Jeyanthini Risikesan,
Jan S Jeppesen,
Ylva Hellsten,
Stuart M Phillips,
Anna K Melin,
Niels Ørtenblad,
Mette Hansen.
PURPOSE: Short periods of reduced energy availability are commonly undertaken by athletes to decrease body mass, possibly improve the power-to-mass ratio, and enhance physical performance. Our primary aim was to investigate the impact of 10 days of low energy availability (LEA) followed by 2 days of optimal energy availability (OEA) on physical performance parameters in trained females. Secondly, physiological markers at the whole-body and molecular level related to performance were evaluated.
METHODS: Thirty young trained eumenorrheic females were matched in pairs based on training history and randomized to a 10-day intervention period of LEA (25 kcal • fat-free mass (FFM)-1 • day-1) or OEA (50 kcal • FFM-1 • day-1) along with supervised exercise training. Before the intervention, participants underwent a 5-day run-in period with OEA + supervised exercise training. Following the LEA intervention, two days of recovery with OEA were completed. Participants underwent muscle biopsies, blood sampling, physical performance tests, body composition measurements, and resting metabolic rate measurements. A linear mixed model was used with group and time as fixed effects and subject as random effects.
RESULTS: Compared to OEA, LEA resulted in reduced body mass, muscle glycogen content, repeated sprint ability, 4-min time trial performance, and rate of force development of the knee extensors (absolute values) (p < 0.05). Two days of recovery restored 4-min time trial performance and partly restored repeated sprint ability, but performance remained inferior to the OEA group. When expressed relative to body mass, LEA did not enhance performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Ten days of LEA resulted in impaired performance (absolute values), with concomitant reductions in muscle glycogen. Two days of recovery with OEA partially restored these impairments, although physical performance (absolute values) was still inferior to being in OEA. Our findings do not support the thesis that LEA giving rise to small reductions in body mass improves the power-to-mass ratio and, thus, increases physical performance.