bims-fragic Biomed News
on Fragmentomics
Issue of 2026–10–04
two papers selected by
Laura Mannarino, Humanitas Research



  1. Trends Biochem Sci. 2026 Oct 01. pii: S0968-0004(26)00285-9. [Epub ahead of print]
      Cell-free RNA (cfRNA) is emerging as a promising analyte for liquid biopsy because it captures dynamic changes in gene expression across tissues and disease states. However, interpretation of cfRNA profiles remains limited by the lack of a unifying framework describing how extracellular RNAs are released, processed, and stabilized. Here, we propose that concepts from cell-free DNA fragmentomics provide a useful lens to interpret cfRNA biology and introduce the concept of cfRNA fragmentomics. We argue that many cfRNAs originate as intracellular ribonucleoprotein complexes that undergo extracellular ribonuclease processing, generating stable fragmented RNAs associated with proteins and other carriers. Under this framework, informative cfRNA signatures may arise not only from diseased tissues but also from indirect systemic responses to disease.
    Keywords:  RNA fragmentomics; cancer biomarkers; cfRNA; extracellular RNA
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2026.09.007
  2. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2026 Oct 01. pii: S2468-2942(26)00278-9. [Epub ahead of print]49 101367
      Low‑dose computed tomography (LDCT) is the established screening backbone for lung cancer in high‑risk populations. However, its clinical value depends on a complete pathway, including eligibility assessment, image acquisition, nodule interpretation, follow‑up, referral, quality assurance, and harm reduction, and not on image detection alone. Artificial intelligence (AI), radiomics, clinical‑risk models, and blood‑ or breath‑based biomarkers are being investigated as tools to improve decisions within that pathway. This narrative, state‑of‑the‑art translational review synthesizes evidence on AI‑enabled integration of clinical risk, LDCT‑derived imaging features, radiomics, longitudinal imaging, and molecular or experimental biomarkers for early lung cancer detection and pulmonary nodule triage. AI‑enabled integration may improve defined decisions within the LDCT pathway, most plausibly pulmonary nodule triage. To distinguish genuine decision support from simple data fusion, this review applies a five‑tier framework: data aggregation, diagnostic enrichment, risk stratification, threshold‑based triage, and pathway‑level decision support across all modalities and studies. Within this framework, cell‑free DNA (cfDNA) methylation and cfDNA fragmentomics occupy a higher translational tier than autoantibodies, generic serum markers, breathomics, or metabolomics, because their signals have a coherent biological basis and they have been tested in multimodal nodule‑triage studies with external validation. AI is best understood as an integrative decision layer within LDCT‑centered pathways. Its value depends on whether it supports calibrated, fair, and actionable decisions, not on discrimination alone. The guiding question of this review is not about a general comparison between AI and biomarkers. Rather, it is about identifying which data layer most benefits each particular decision, pinpointing the exact stage of the LDCT pathway where that decision occurs, and evaluating that benefit based on rigorous evidence of calibration, safety, and net clinical benefit.
    Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Cell-free DNA; Liquid biopsy; Low-dose computed tomography; Lung cancer screening; Precision screening; Pulmonary nodules; Radiomics
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2026.101367