bims-evares Biomed News
on Evaluation of research
Issue of 2026–02–15
ten papers selected by
Thomas Krichel, Open Library Society



  1. Indian J Orthop. 2026 Feb;60(2): 343-354
       Background: The Indian Journal of Orthopaedics (IJO) has played a pivotal role in disseminating Indian orthopaedic research. However, a comprehensive bibliometric assessment of its publication trends, citation impact, and research landscape has been lacking.
    Methods: A bibliometric and scientometric analysis was conducted on all Indian-authored articles published in the IJO and indexed in Scopus from 2007 to 2024. 1614 records were analyzed for publication trends, citation metrics, document types, funding, international collaboration, geographical distribution, subject areas, and institutional productivity.
    Results: The IJO demonstrated substantial growth, with annual publications rising from 80 in 2007 to a peak of 280 in 2023 (total 2763 articles & 23,188 citations). Indian authors contributed 58.4% (n = 1614) of articles during 2007 and 2024, and received 13,821 citations, with an average of 8.56 citations per publication (CPP). A significant inverse relationship is observed between publication volume and per-article impact (r =- 0.870; p < 0.001). Research articles dominated (67.2%), while reviews (12.2%) and conference papers (3.7%) had higher CPPs (14.11 and 20.63, respectively). Only 2.79% of papers received external funding. International collaboration was most frequent with the UK (45 papers, CPP 16.51) and the USA (36 papers, CPP 8.17). Delhi and Maharashtra led in output, while Assam showed the highest CPP (16.83). Thematically, trauma, spine, and metabolic diseases were most researched, but regenerative medicine was underrepresented. The top 35 institutions contributed 67.5% of papers.
    Conclusions: The IJO has achieved significant quantitative growth and increased research diversity, but declining citation impact and limited funding highlight the need for enhanced research quality and broader collaborations. These findings provide actionable insights for strengthening the global relevance and scientific excellence of Indian orthopaedic research.
    Graphical Abstract:
    Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-025-01624-x.
    Keywords:  Bibliometrics; Citation Analysis; Collaboration; India; Journals; Orthopedics; Research Trends
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-025-01624-x
  2. Korean J Neurotrauma. 2026 Jan;22(1): 3-13
      The Korean Journal of Neurotrauma (KJNT) has been the official journal of the Korean Neurotraumatology Society for over 2 decades, and has evolved from a domestic publication to an internationally indexed journal. We aimed to comprehensively evaluate this journal's long-term development and academic trajectory using bibliometric analysis. A bibliometric analysis was conducted on all articles published in the KJNT between 2005 and 2025. Publication trends, article types, authorship, institutional participation, geographic distribution, research topics, and citation patterns were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Keyword trends were assessed using Medical Subject Headings-based standardization supplemented with title-based keyword extraction from earlier publications. Over a 20-year period, the KJNT has demonstrated a steady increase in publication volume, accompanied by notable structural changes in article composition. Traumatic brain injury remains the predominant research topic, with the number of studies on spinal cord injury and spinal trauma having increased over time. Review articles are the most highly cited publications, although one case report proposing an alternative treatment strategy has also achieved high citation impact. International submissions increased after the KJNT's transition to an English-language journal and major database indexation, currently representing approximately 30% of all publications, predominantly including case reports. Authorship analysis revealed broad institutional participation without concentration among specific individuals or centers. KJNT achieved stable growth through a strong clinical focus and collective academic engagement. To further enhance its global influence, continued efforts to promote high-quality original research and international collaborations are warranted.
    Keywords:  Bibliometrics; Journal article; Nervous system trauma; Spinal cord injuries; Traumatic brain injury
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2026.22.e7
  3. World J Urol. 2026 Feb 11. 44(1): 159
      
    Keywords:  BPH management; Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Bibliometric analysis; Lower urinary-tract symptoms
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-026-06257-9
  4. Ann Jt. 2026 ;11 3
       Background: Orthopaedic Fellowship Directors (FDs) and Division Chiefs (DCs) have a profound impact on trainee development. The purpose of this study was to identify and evaluate common demographic and academic characteristics among both FDs and DCs within orthopaedic arthroplasty divisions in the United States.
    Methods: Adult reconstruction fellowship and residency programs were identified through the AAHKS Fellowship Match Program list and AMA's FREIDA database. Data on FDs and DCs were collected from program websites and verified through AAHKS listings. Demographic, academic, and professional information, including sex, race/ethnicity, education, fellowship training, academic rank, leadership roles, institutional tenure, and patient satisfaction, were obtained from publicly available sources such as online curricula vitae, Doximity, and LinkedIn. Research productivity metrics, including h-index, total publications, and ResearchGate (RG) scores, were extracted from Scopus and RG databases.
    Results: One hundred and sixteen FDs and 77 DCs from 137 orthopaedic arthroplasty programs were included. 98.2% of surgeons were males. Racial demographics were comprised of 83.4% Caucasian, 11.2% Asian, 3.6% Hispanic, and 1.8% African Americans. The mean age was 52.7 years, with an average of 18.1 years since fellowship completion, 13.8 years at the current institution, and 9.7 years in respective leadership role. Thirty leaders (17.8%) held additional graduate degrees, and 68 (40.2%) occupied other leadership positions within their departments or hospitals. The average h-index was 16.9. In terms of academic rank, 29.9% of surgeons were Full Professors, while 26.6% and 23.1% were Associate and Assistant professors, respectively. There was a moderate positive correlation between academic rank and h-index (r=0.46). Fellowship programs that graduated the most FDs and DCs were Massachusetts General Hospital [17], Hospital for Special Surgery [17] and Mayo Clinic [13].
    Conclusions: The majority of orthopaedic arthroplasty FDs and DCs are male and Caucasian, many hold additional leadership roles, and a small number of fellowship programs produce a disproportionately high number of current leaders. These findings highlight the need for targeted efforts to increase gender diversity and mentorship to strengthen the future of academic arthroplasty and improve training and patient care.
    Keywords:  Division Chiefs (DCs); Fellowship Directors (FDs); Hip and knee arthroplasty; diversity; leadership
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.21037/aoj-24-59
  5. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2026 Jan 07. 114(1): 47-54
      The selection of authors for editorials reflects perceptions of expertise and influence. Our objectives were to determine author geographic and gender distribution, determine temporal trends in editorial authorship, and identify factors associated with the inclusion of authors affiliated with low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in editorials on research conducted in LMICs. We conducted a cross-sectional study of editorials on research in LMICs published in 15 global health, pediatrics, and general medicine journals from 2014 to 2024. To assess temporal changes in authorship, we plotted the proportion of editorial authors affiliated with LMICs and those with female names by year. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with the inclusion of one or more LMIC-affiliated authors. There were 107,629 publications and 1,350 editorials on research in LMICs with 2,401 authors. Authors of editorials were most often affiliated with institutions in North America (38.1%) and high-income countries (71.6%). The proportion of authors of editorials affiliated with institutions in high-income countries decreased from 84.9% in 2014 to 65.3% in 2024. Authors of editorials more commonly had male names than female (60.1% versus 38.7%, P <0.001). The proportion of editorial authors with female names increased from 32.1% in 2014 to 48.2% in 2024. Editorials accompanying publications reporting studies with larger sample sizes (aOR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.03-2.26) and research conducted in sub-Saharan Africa (aOR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.74-4.68) were more likely to include LMIC-affiliated authors. Additional efforts are needed to include authors affiliated with LMICs in editorials on research conducted in LMICs.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.25-0534
  6. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2026 Feb 01. pii: S0363-0188(26)00037-X. [Epub ahead of print]
       BACKGROUND: Disparities in research grant funding have been documented across various fields of medicine; yet gender inequities within radiology remain underexplored.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate gender-based differences in NIH radiology grant funding, focusing on the number of grants awarded and average funding amounts received by principal investigators (PIs) from 2009 to 2023.
    METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted using publicly available NIH RePORTER data. Grants awarded to PIs affiliated with radiology departments from 2009 to 2023 were included. Gender was inferred using Genderize.io and verified manually. Extracted data included number of grants, average and total funding amounts, and PI gender. Analyses included descriptive statistics, t-tests for comparing means, and linear regression to evaluate temporal trends.
    RESULTS: A total of 9,378 NIH-funded radiology grants were analyzed. Of these, 75.2% (n=7,056) went to men and 24.8% (n=2,322) to women. Men received significantly higher average funding per grant than women ($704.2 K vs $535.5 K; p < 0.0001) and were more likely to be repeat recipients (p < 0.05), revealing a persistent funding gap between genders. Total funding to men PIs was $5.0 B versus $1.3 B for women PIs. While the men-to-women ratio narrowed (7:1 in 2009 to 2.8:1 in 2023), men consistently received higher grant volume and funding annually.
    CONCLUSION: Despite incremental progress in women's representation, these findings underscore ongoing gender disparities in radiology funding. This imbalance may hinder innovation and limit the range of perspectives driving future research. Evidence-informed strategies may help address inequities, promote diversity and innovation, and ensure equitable, high-quality patient care.
    Keywords:  Academic medicine; Funding inequity; Gender disparities; NIH grants; Principal investigators; Radiology; Research equity
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2026.01.013
  7. Eur J Dent Educ. 2026 Feb 12.
       OBJECTIVES: Despite increased number of women entering dental academia in the last decade, gender disparities persist in leadership roles. This study examined gender trends within administrative leadership across U.S. dental schools.
    MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on gender, age, employment status, academic rank and administrative title were extracted from the ADEA Survey of Dental School Faculty. Prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess gender representation in leadership over time, stratified by rank and age and adjusted for employment status (aPR).
    RESULTS: On average, women held fewer leadership roles than men (17.5% vs. 19.8%, p < 0.001), even after adjusting for employment status. Women were underrepresented in senior administrative positions such as department chairs (PRs = 0.57-0.81), division directors (PRs = 0.40-0.72) and deans (PRs = 0.46-0.62). Younger women were more likely to hold leadership roles than those aged ≥ 60.
    CONCLUSION: While overrepresented as allied program directors and other nonspecific directorships, women continue to be underrepresented in more senior leadership roles, underscoring the need for systemic reform. Women continue to hold fewer senior leadership roles than men, emphasising the need for systemic change in policies and institutional culture to facilitate gender equity in academic dentistry.
    Keywords:  academic dentistry; dental faculty; dentistry; gender disparity; leadership
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.70109
  8. Childs Nerv Syst. 2026 Feb 13. 42(1): 71
       PURPOSE: Internati onal medical graduates (IMGs) comprise 25% of practicing physicians in the USA, but their representation in the pediatric neurosurgical workforce has yet to be explored. This study evaluates the impact of IMG status on fellowship match rates, board certification rates, and practice locations among individuals completing pediatric neurosurgical fellowships in the USA from 1983 to 2023.
    METHODS: Graduates of accredited fellowships were identified using a database maintained by the Accreditation Council for Pediatric Neurosurgery Fellowships (ACPNF). Demographics, medical school, residency/fellowship programs, current practice location, and ABNS and APBNS certification status were determined through internet searches. Graduates were categorized by IMG status, defined as having graduated from a medical school outside of the USA and Canada.
    RESULTS: Of the 488 graduates of accredited fellowships from 1992 to 2023, 17% (82) were IMGs. IMGs have lower rates of ABNS and ABPNS certification compared to USMGs (ABNS IMG 24.7%, USMG 74.7%, p < 0.001; ABPNS IMG 14.3%, USMG 62.9%, p < 0.001). IMGs are more likely to practice outside of the USA compared to USMGs (IMGs 55.8%, USMG 9.0%, p < 0.001). IMGs have significantly lower fellowship match rates compared to USMGs (69.5% IMG, 98.5% USMG, p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSION: Over the last decade, the percentage of IMGs completing pediatric neurosurgical fellowship has declined significantly. IMG fellows have lower rates of ABNS and APBNS certification and were less likely to practice in the USA compared to USMGs. These findings highlight the diminishing role of IMGs in the US pediatric neurosurgical workforce, raising concerns about the capacity to address global pediatric neurosurgical shortages.
    Keywords:  IMG; Pediatric Neurosurgery; Workforce
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-026-07169-0
  9. Fed Regist. 2026 Feb 09. 91(26): 5774-5776