bims-cyhorp Biomed News
on Cyclin-dependent kinases in hormone receptor positive breast cancer
Issue of 2022‒09‒11
eight papers selected by
Piotr Okupski,



  1. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 09.
      Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) have been approved for breast cancer (BC) treatment. Several trials suggested that arthralgia was reduced in patients treated with ET plus CDK4/6i compared with that in those with ET-alone. We aimed to compare arthralgia rates in BC patients treated with/without CDK4/6i. We reviewed randomized controlled phase II/III trials investigating CDK4/6i with ET in hormone receptor-positive and epidermal growth factor 2-negative BC. Publications were retrieved from PubMed from January 2014 to April 2021. We compared arthralgia rates between patients who were administered ET plus CDK4/6i (CDK4/6i group) and those treated with ET-alone (control group). We reviewed 12 trials that reported data on adverse effects for arthralgia. These trials included 17,440 patients (9255 in the CDK4/6i group and 8185 in the control group). The arthralgia rate in the CDK4/6i group was significantly lower than that in the control group (27.6% vs. 34.8%, p < .001), especially in early BC (28.8% vs. 37.3%, p < .001). These suggested that the arthralgia rate in patients treated with ET plus CDK4/6i was lower than that in patients treated with ET-alone and that CDK4/6i may decrease the arthralgia rate in BC patients treated with ET, especially in early BC.
    Keywords:  arthralgia; breast cancer; cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors; endocrine therapy; inflammatory cytokines
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.13840
  2. Cancer Diagn Progn. 2022 Sep-Oct;2(5):2(5): 533-541
      BACKGROUND/AIM: Although CDK4/6 inhibitors have been increasingly used in combination with hormonal agents to treat hormone-receptor positive and human epithelial growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer, the mechanism of CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance and its impact on established therapy for post-resistance, especially bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy, are unclear.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sensitivity of RB knockout MCF7 clones to CDK4/6 inhibitors was evaluated in vitro. One RB knockout clone was subcutaneously implanted in nude mice and the effects of bevacizumab on volume and microvessel density (MVD) of tumors were investigated.
    RESULTS: Palbociclib did not exhibit antitumor efficacy against the RB knockout tumor, in contrast to the parental MCF7 xenograft model. Bevacizumab significantly exhibited antitumor efficacy and suppressed the MVD both in RB knockout and parental MCF7 xenograft models.
    CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab inhibited tumor growth by suppressing MVD in the CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant tumor acquired due to RB loss, suggesting its efficacy also in patients after treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors.
    Keywords:  CDK4/6 inhibitor; RB; angiogenesis; bevacizumab; breast cancer; hormone receptor positive; resistance
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.21873/cdp.10138
  3. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 ;13 1000704
      Background: There is accumulating evidence support human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low as a biologically distinct subtype of breast cancer. The present study was conducted to explore whether HER2-low expression will affect the clinical efficacy of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor for patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer.Methods: Patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer who were treated with palbociclib from January 2019 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed based on real-world clinical practice. HER2-zero was defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0, and HER2-low was defined as IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) negative. The primary end point was progression free survival (PFS), and the secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival(OS) and safety.
    Results: 45 patients received palbociclib plus aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant therapy, including 24 HER-2-zero and 21 HER-2-low patients. There were no statistically significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups. No significant differences were observed in ORR (41.7% vs. 28.6%, P=0.360) and DCR (79.2% vs. 76.2%, P=0.811) between HER-2-zero and HER-2-low patients. And simultaneously, HER2-zero and HER2-low patients obtained similar median PFS (16.2m vs. 14.1m, P=0.263). The median OS was not reached. Neutropenia and leukopenia were the most common adverse events. Grade 3-4 adverse events(AEs) occurred in 58.3% and 57.1% of patients, respectively.
    Conclusions: HER2-low expression does not affect the clinical efficacy of palbociclib and our present study did not support incorporating HER2-low into systemic therapy decisions for patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitor.
    Keywords:  CDK4/6 inhibitor; HER2-low; breast cancer; endocrine therapy; palbociclib
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1000704
  4. Cancer Diagn Progn. 2022 Sep-Oct;2(5):2(5): 585-591
      BACKGROUND/AIM: Low expression of HER2 has defined a new "HER2-low" subgroup of breast cancer with distinct clinicopathological characteristics and both prognostic and predictive implications. The impact of low HER2 expression in metastatic hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer treated with first-line CDK4/6 inhibitors has not been studied. Using real-world patient data, we aimed to identify prognostic differences in this patient population according to HER2 expression with immunohistochemistry.PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 191 patients from 5 Oncology Department databases in Thessaloniki, Greece, with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors in the first line, for whom detailed immunohistochemical HER2 data could be retrieved.
    RESULTS: Median progression-free survival was numerically different among the different HER2 subgroups (3.35 years for HER2 0 tumors, 2.18 years for HER2 +1 tumors, 1.74 years for HER2 +2/ISH-negative tumors), but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.477). Median PFS was statistically significantly longer in patients without visceral metastases (5.45 years) compared to patients with visceral metastases (1.61 years) (p=0.017). Median PFS was also statistically significantly longer in patients taking an aromatase inhibitor (2.99 years) compared to patients taking fulvestrant (1.33 years) (p<0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in the other subgroups examined.
    CONCLUSION: CDK4/6 inhibitors are equally effective as first-line treatment agents, regardless of the exact level of HER2 expression. Numerical differences, however, do exist among the different HER2 subgroups, and merit further evaluation in future studies to better study this phenomenon.
    Keywords:  Breast cancer; CDK 4/6 inhibitors; HER2-low; hormone receptor positive
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.21873/cdp.10146
  5. PLoS One. 2022 ;17(9): e0273182
      Inducing senescence in cancer cells is emerging as a new therapeutic strategy. In order to find ways to enhance senescence induction by palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor approved for treatment of metastatic breast cancer, we performed functional genetic screens in palbociclib-resistant cells. Using this approach, we found that loss of CDK2 results in strong senescence induction in palbociclib-treated cells. Treatment with the CDK2 inhibitor indisulam, which phenocopies genetic CDK2 inactivation, led to sustained senescence induction when combined with palbociclib in various cell lines and lung cancer xenografts. Treating cells with indisulam led to downregulation of cyclin H, which prevented CDK2 activation. Combined treatment with palbociclib and indisulam induced a senescence program and sensitized cells to senolytic therapy. Our data indicate that inhibition of CDK2 through indisulam treatment can enhance senescence induction by CDK4/6 inhibition.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273182
  6. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Sep 07.
      PURPOSE: Palbociclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor which shows promising effect in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the real-world efficacy and toxicity of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy.METHODS: This is a retrospective study performed in two tertiary referral hospitals in Korea. Advanced breast cancer patients who were treated with 1st-line palbociclib plus endocrine therapy were enrolled.
    RESULTS: A total of 216 patients were included between August 2016 and May 2019. Median age was 56 (29-89) years old and 75 patients (34.7%) were premenopausal. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 33.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 24.7 to 41.3] and objective response rate was 59.3%. Luminal B patients had shorter PFS (33.0 months vs. Not reached, p = 0.019) and tendency of lower ORR (58.3 vs. 62.0%, p = 0.19) compared to luminal A patients. Multivariate analysis revealed luminal B (adjusted hazard ratio 1.90, p = 0.038) and germline BRCA mutation (adjusted hazard ratio 5.57, p = 0.002) as an independent poor prognostic factor for PFS. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event was neutropenia (86.7%).
    CONCLUSION: The efficacy and toxicity of palbociclib in the real world were comparable to those of clinical trials. In addition, palbociclib with endocrine therapy was an effective treatment option for young patients. Luminal B and germline BRCA mutation were associated with inferior outcome.
    Keywords:  BRCA; Hormone receptor-positive breast cancer; Luminal type; Palbociclib; Young Asian breast cancer
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06566-8
  7. Nat Commun. 2022 Sep 07. 13(1): 5258
      CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy have demonstrated higher antitumor activity than endocrine therapy alone for the treatment of advanced estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Some of these tumors are de novo resistant to CDK4/6 inhibitors and others develop acquired resistance. Here, we show that p16 overexpression is associated with reduced antitumor activity of CDK4/6 inhibitors in patient-derived xenografts (n = 37) and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cell lines, as well as reduced response of early and advanced breast cancer patients to CDK4/6 inhibitors (n = 89). We also identified heterozygous RB1 loss as biomarker of acquired resistance and poor clinical outcome. Combination of the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib with the PI3K inhibitor alpelisib showed antitumor activity in estrogen receptor-positive non-basal-like breast cancer patient-derived xenografts, independently of PIK3CA, ESR1 or RB1 mutation, also in drug de-escalation experiments or omitting endocrine therapy. Our results offer insights into predicting primary/acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors and post-progression therapeutic strategies.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32828-6
  8. Sci Adv. 2022 Sep 09. 8(36): eabq4293
      Inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6i) are standard first-line treatments for metastatic ER+ breast cancer. However, acquired resistance to CDK4/6i invariably develops, and the molecular phenotypes and exploitable vulnerabilities associated with resistance are not yet fully characterized. We developed a panel of CDK4/6i-resistant breast cancer cell lines and patient-derived organoids and demonstrate that a subset of resistant models accumulates mitotic segregation errors and micronuclei, displaying increased sensitivity to inhibitors of mitotic checkpoint regulators TTK and Aurora kinase A/B. RB1 loss, a well-recognized mechanism of CDK4/6i resistance, causes such mitotic defects and confers enhanced sensitivity to TTK inhibition. In these models, inhibition of TTK with CFI-402257 induces premature chromosome segregation, leading to excessive mitotic segregation errors, DNA damage, and cell death. These findings nominate the TTK inhibitor CFI-402257 as a therapeutic strategy for a defined subset of ER+ breast cancer patients who develop resistance to CDK4/6i.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abq4293