Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Feb 04. pii: clincanres.3276.2021. [Epub ahead of print]
Sara M Tolaney,
Masakazu Toi,
Patrick Neven,
Joohyuk Sohn,
Eva-Maria Grischke,
Antonio Llombart-Cussac,
Hatem Soliman,
Hong Wang,
Sameera Wijayawardana,
Valerie M Jansen,
Lacey M Litchfield,
George W Sledge.
BACKGROUND: PIK3CA and ESR1 mutations have been implicated in resistance to endocrine therapy (ET) in HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC). Inhibition of CDK4&6 has been hypothesized as a therapeutic strategy to overcome endocrine resistance in patients with PIK3CA- or ESR1-mutant breast cancers. The objective of this exploratory analysis was to assess efficacy of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant in patients with or without PIK3CA or ESR1 mutations in MONARCH 2.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: MONARCH 2 was a global, randomized, double-blind Phase 3 trial of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant in women with HR+, HER2- ABC that had progressed on ET. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive abemaciclib plus fulvestrant or placebo plus fulvestrant. Exploratory analyses assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and other endpoints, in patients with or without PIK3CA or ESR1 mutations detectable in baseline ctDNA.
RESULTS: Abemaciclib plus fulvestrant improved PFS compared to placebo plus fulvestrant in both PIK3CA-wild-type and PIK3CA-mutant subgroups, as well as both ESR1-wild-type and ESR1-mutant subgroups. Additional endpoints, including OS, were also improved following treatment with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant regardless of PIK3CA or ESR1 mutation status.
CONCLUSION: Abemaciclib plus fulvestrant was effective regardless of PIK3CA or ESR1 mutation status, with benefit in both PFS and OS, with a numerically greater improvement in median PFS relative to placebo plus fulvestrant for PIK3CA or ESR1-mutant tumors compared to the respective wild-type subgroups, in women with HR+, HER2- ABC that had progressed on ET.