bims-curels Biomed News
on Leigh syndrome
Issue of 2023‒05‒21
sixteen papers selected by
Cure Mito Foundation



  1. Clin Case Rep. 2023 May;11(5): e7308
      In 1-year-old girl presenting with neurodegenerative mitochondrial disease (Leigh syndrome), mutation analysis was performed by whole exome sequencing. Pathogenic variants were then analyzed in parents and relatives by Sanger sequencing. We identified a point mutation c.G484A in NDUFS8 gene which was homozygous in patient and heterozygous in parents.
    Keywords:  Leigh syndrome; mitochondrial disease; whole exome sequencing
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.7308
  2. Am J Bioeth. 2023 May 19. 1-10
      Rare genetic diseases collectively impact millions of individuals in the United States. These patients and their families share many challenges including delayed diagnosis, lack of knowledgeable providers, and limited economic incentives to develop new therapies for small patient groups. As such, rare disease patients and families often must rely on advocacy, including both self-advocacy to access clinical care and public advocacy to advance research. However, these demands raise serious concerns for equity, as both care and research for a given disease can depend on the education, financial resources, and social capital available to the patients in a given community. In this article, we utilize three case examples to illustrate ethical challenges at the intersection of rare diseases, advocacy and justice, including how reliance on advocacy in rare disease may drive unintended consequences for equity. We conclude with a discussion of opportunities for diverse stakeholders to begin to address these challenges.
    Keywords:  Bioethics; genetics; health equity; patient advocacy; rare diseases; word
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2207500
  3. Ther Adv Rare Dis. 2022 Jan-Dec;3:3 26330040221133124
      The inaugural IndoUSrare Annual Conference was held virtually from 29 November to 2 December 2021 and was organized by the Indo US Organization for Rare Diseases (IndoUSrare). The event saw participation from over 250 stakeholders of rare diseases who joined in virtually by audio/video on the Zoom platform from around the world, with a majority of attendees concentrated in the Indian subcontinent and the United States. The conference was held over 4 days from 10:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. Eastern Time on each day, which accommodated participation by speakers and attendees from both the eastern and western hemispheres. The agenda over 4 days holistically covered broad topics of interest to different stakeholder groups such as representatives from organizations working toward policy frameworks for rare diseases or orphan drugs (Days 1, 4), biomedical research institutions (Day 2), patient advocacy organizations (Day 3), and patient advocacy and engagement offices within Industry (Day 4). In this meeting report, we summarize the key highlights from each day of this conference, with a perspective on future directions encouraging cross-border multistakeholder collaborations to maximize diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in rare disease diagnosis, research, clinical trials, and treatment access. Each day included a keynote lecture on the theme of the day followed by a series of individual speaker presentations and/or a panel discussion. The goal was to understand current barriers and bottlenecks in the rare disease ecosystem. The discussions also helped highlight gaps and identify potential solutions that can be achieved through building multistakeholder collaborations across international borders, which we believe IndoUSrare is uniquely positioned to do with organizational programs such as rare patient foundation alliance, technology-enabled patient concierge, research corps, and corporate alliance program. The inaugural conference of the then 2+-year-old IndoUSrare organization laid the foundation for ongoing engagement of stakeholders between the two countries - the United States and India. The long-term goal is to scale the conference more broadly and serve as a model for other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).Plain language summary: IndoUSrare held its inaugural Annual Conference from 29 November to 2 December 2021. It was focused on the theme of cross-border collaborations for rare disease drug development, with each day dedicated to a specific patient-focused discussion topic, ranging from patient-led advocacy (Advocacy Day), research (Research Day), rare disease community support and engagement (Patients Alliance Day), to industry collaborations (Industry Day). The 4-day conference was held in virtual mode and attracted over 250 attendees from across the globe. This meeting report provides the key highlights of the event and summarizes learnings and future directions encouraging cross-border collaborations to increase diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in rare disease research and clinical trials.
    Keywords:  DEI; clinical trials; collaborations; diversity; meeting report; orphan drugs; patient advocacy; patient engagement
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1177/26330040221133124
  4. Ther Adv Rare Dis. 2022 Jan-Dec;3:3 26330040221100840
      Introduction: Rare genetic diseases affect millions of people worldwide. Most of them are caused by defective genes that impair quality of life and can lead to premature death. As genetic therapies aim to fix or replace defective genes, they are considered the most promising treatment for rare genetic diseases. Yet, as these therapies are still under development, it is still unclear whether they will be successful in treating these diseases. This study aims to address this gap by assessing researchers' opinions on the future of genetic therapies for the treatment of rare genetic diseases.Methods: We conducted a global cross-sectional web-based survey of researchers who recently authored peer-reviewed articles related to rare genetic diseases.
    Results: We assessed the opinions of 1430 researchers with high and good knowledge about genetic therapies for the treatment of rare genetic diseases. Overall, the respondents believed that genetic therapies would be the standard of care for rare genetic diseases before 2036, leading to cures after this period. CRISPR-Cas9 was considered the most likely approach to fixing or replacing defective genes in the next 15 years. The respondents with good knowledge believed that genetic therapies would only have long-lasting effects after 2036, while those with high knowledge were divided on this issue. The respondents with good knowledge on the subject believed that non-viral vectors are more likely to be successful in fixing or replacing defective genes in the next 15 years, while most of the respondents with high knowledge believed viral vectors would be more successful.
    Conclusion: Overall, the researchers who participated in this study expect that in the future genetic therapies will greatly benefit the treatment of patients with rare genetic diseases.
    Keywords:  expert opinion; future; genetic therapies; rare genetic diseases; survey
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1177/26330040221100840
  5. Exp Gerontol. 2023 May 10. pii: S0531-5565(23)00124-9. [Epub ahead of print] 112203
      Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is as a multi-copy genome existing in hundreds to thousands copies in cells depending on cell metabolism and exposure to endogenous and/or environmental stressors. The coordination of mtDNA replication and transcription regulates the pace of mitochondrial biogenesis to guarantee the minimum number of organelles per cell. mtDNA inheritance follows a maternal lineage, although bi-parental inheritance has been reported in some species and in the case of mitochondrial diseases in humans. mtDNA mutations (e.g., point mutations, deletions, copy number variations) have been identified in the setting of several human diseases. For instance, sporadic and inherited rare disorders involving the nervous system as well higher risk of developing cancer and neurodegenerative conditions, including Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease, have been associated with polymorphic mtDNA variants. Accrual of mtDNA mutations has also been identified in several tissues and organs, including heart and muscle, of old experimental animals and older adults, which may contribute to the development of aging phenotypes. The role played by mtDNA homeostasis and mtDNA quality control pathways in human health is actively investigated for the possibility of developing targeted therapeutics for a wide range of conditions.
    Keywords:  Heteroplasmy; Mitochondrial biogenesis; Mitochondrial diseases; Mitochondrial quality; mtDNA deletions; mtDNA mutations
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2023.112203
  6. Ther Adv Rare Dis. 2023 Jan-Dec;4:4 26330040231164425
      Background: Patient advocacy groups (PAGs) serve a vital role for rare disease patients and families by providing educational resources, support, and a sense of community. Motivated by patient need, PAGs are increasingly at the forefront of policy, research, and drug development for their disease of interest.Objectives: The study explored the current landscape of PAGs in order to guide new and existing PAGs on available resources and challenges to research engagement. We aim to inform industry, advocates, and healthcare personnel about PAG achievements and ways they are increasingly involved in research.
    Design: We chose PAGs from the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) Coalition for Patient Advocacy Groups (CPAG) listserv and the National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD) 'Find a patient organization'.
    Methods: We surveyed eligible PAG leaders about the demographics, goals, and research activities of their organization. For analysis, PAGs were bucketed by size, age, prevalence of disease, and budget. Data were de-identified for cross-tabulation and multinomial logistic regression analysis with R.
    Results: Research engagement was an extremely important goal for most PAGs (81%), though ultra-rare disease and high-budget PAGs were most likely to cite it as the top priority. In total, 79% reported research engagement in some capacity, including registries, translational research, and clinical trials. 'Ultra-rare' PAGs were less likely than 'rare' PAGs to have an ongoing clinical trial.
    Conclusion: While PAGs of varying sizes, budgets, and maturity levels reported an interest in research, limited funding and lack of disease awareness continue to create barriers to achieving their goals. While support tools exist to make research more accessible, often their utility depends on the funding, sustainability, maturity of the PAG itself, and the level of investment of collaborators. Despite the availability of current support systems, there are challenges related to both the start-up and sustainability of patient-centric research efforts.
    Keywords:  clinical trial; drug development; patient advocacy group; registry; research; support
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1177/26330040231164425
  7. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 May 18. 302 358-359
      Rare diseases are commonly defined by an incidence of less than 5/10000 inhabitants. There are some 8000 different rare diseases known. So even if a single rare disease is seldom, together they pose a relevant problem for diagnosis and treatment. This is especially true if a patient is treated for another common disease. University hospital of Gießen is part of the CORD-MI Project on rare diseases within the German Medical Informatics Initiative (MII) and a member of the MIRACUM consortium within the MII. As part of the ongoing Development for a clinical research study monitor within the use case 1 of MIRACUM, the study monitor has been configured to detect patients with rare diseases during their routine clinical encounters. The goal was to send a documentation request to the corresponding patient chart within the patient data management system for extended disease documentation to enhance clinical awareness for the patients' potential problems. The project was started in late 2022 and has so far been successfully tuned to detect patients with Mucoviscidosis and place notifications within the patient chart of the patient data management system (PDMS) on intensive care units.
    Keywords:  FHIR; OMOP; Rare diseases; mucoviscidosis; patient data management system; study monitor
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI230139
  8. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Jun;33 101136
      Background: Most researchers and study participants believe that the summary, or aggregate, results of health research should be returned to study participants. However, researchers often do not return aggregate results. A better understanding of the impediments to results return could support improvements in this practice.Methods: This qualitative study convened eight virtual focus groups, four with investigators and four with patient partners from research studies funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). In total, 23 investigators and 20 partners participated. We explored perspectives, experiences, influences, and recommendations related to aggregate results return.
    Results: Focus group participants described the ethical importance of returning aggregate results, as well as the benefits to study participants. They also noted important impediments to results return, emphasizing IRB and logistical challenges and describing a lack of support for the practice both on the part of institutions and the field at large. Participants highlighted the value of patients and caregivers' perspectives and contributions to results return, which focused on returning the most relevant findings through effective channels and formats. They further emphasized the importance of planning and identified resources that could support results return.
    Conclusion: Researchers, funders, and the field can better facilitate results return by promoting standardized processes in research, such as the earmarking of funds for results return and inclusion of results returns milestones in research plans. More intentional policies, infrastructures, and resources that support results return may lead to more widespread return of study results to those who make these studies possible.
    Keywords:  Aggregate results; Comparative effectiveness research; Patient engagement; Patient-centered outcomes research; Results return; Returning results
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101136
  9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 13. 23(1): 484
      BACKGROUND: The aims of this research were to provide a better understanding of the specific evidence needs for assessment of clinical and cost-effectiveness of cell and gene therapies, and to explore the extent that the relevant categories of evidence are considered in health technology assessment (HTA) processes.METHODS: A targeted literature review was conducted to identify the specific categories of evidence relevant to the assessment of these therapies. Forty-six HTA reports for 9 products in 10 cell and gene therapy indications across 8 jurisdictions were analysed to determine the extent to which various items of evidence were considered.
    RESULTS: The items to which the HTA bodies reacted positively were: treatment was for a rare disease or serious condition, lack of alternative therapies, evidence indicating substantial health gains, and when alternative payment models could be agreed. The items to which they reacted negatively were: use of unvalidated surrogate endpoints, single arm trials without an adequately matched alternative therapy, inadequate reporting of adverse consequences and risks, short length of follow-up in clinical trials, extrapolating to long-term outcomes, and uncertainty around the economic estimates.
    CONCLUSIONS: The consideration by HTA bodies of evidence relating to the particular features of cell and gene therapies is variable. Several suggestions are made for addressing the assessment challenges posed by these therapies. Jurisdictions conducting HTAs of these therapies can consider whether these suggestions could be incorporated within their existing approach through strengthening deliberative decision-making or performing additional analyses.
    Keywords:  Advanced therapy medicinal products; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Health technology assessment; Managed entry agreements; Reimbursement
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09494-5
  10. BMC Public Health. 2023 May 19. 23(1): 910
      BACKGROUND: Work participation is a crucial aspect of health outcome and an important part of life for most people with rare genetic diseases. Despite that work participation is a social determinant of health and seems necessary for understanding health behaviours and quality of life, it is an under-researched and under-recognized aspect in many rare diseases. The objectives of this study was to map and describe existing research on work participation, identify research gaps, and point to research agendas in a selection of rare genetic diseases.METHODS: A scoping review was performed by searching relevant literature in bibliographic databases and other sources. Studies addressing work participation in people with rare genetic diseases published in peer reviewed journals were assessed using EndNote and Rayyan. Data were mapped and extracted based on the research questions concerning the characteristics of the research.
    RESULTS: Of 19,867 search results, 571 articles were read in full text, and 141 satisfied the eligibility criteria covering 33 different rare genetic diseases; 7 were reviews and 134 primary research articles. In 21% of the articles the primary aim was to investigate work participation. The extent of studies varied between the different diseases. Two diseases had more than 20 articles, but most had only one or two articles. Cross-sectional quantitative studies were predominant, with few utilizing prospective or qualitative design. Nearly all articles (96%) reported information about work participation rate, and 45% also included information about factors associated with work participation and work disability. Due to differences in methodologies, cultures and respondents, comparison between and within diseases are difficult. Nevertheless, studies indicated that many people with different rare genetic diseases experience challenges related to work, closely associated to the symptoms of the disease.
    CONCLUSION: While studies indicate high prevalence of work disability in many patients with rare diseases, the research is scarce and fragmented. More research is warranted. Information about the unique challenges of living with different rare diseases is crucial for health and welfare systems to better facilitate work participation. In addition, the changing nature of work in the digital age, may also open up new possibilities for people with rare genetic diseases and should be explored.
    Keywords:  Employment; Rare diseases; Scoping review; Work disability; Work participation
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15654-3
  11. Eye (Lond). 2023 Apr 25.
      Historically, distinct mitochondrial syndromes were recognised clinically by their ocular features. Due to their predilection for metabolically active tissue, mitochondrial diseases frequently involve the eye, resulting in a range of ophthalmic manifestations including progressive external ophthalmoplegia, retinopathy and optic neuropathy, as well as deficiencies of the retrochiasmal visual pathway. With the wider availability of genetic testing in clinical practice, it is now recognised that genotype-phenotype correlations in mitochondrial diseases can be imprecise: many classic syndromes can be associated with multiple genes and genetic variants, and the same genetic variant can have multiple clinical presentations, including subclinical ophthalmic manifestations in individuals who are otherwise asymptomatic. Previously considered rare diseases with no effective treatments, considerable progress has been made in our understanding of mitochondrial diseases with new therapies emerging, in particular, gene therapy for inherited optic neuropathies.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02523-x
  12. Ther Adv Rare Dis. 2021 Jan-Dec;2:2 26330040211038564
      The COVID-19 pandemic transformed the delivery of healthcare across the world. Telehealth has emerged as the primary method for providing healthcare early in the pandemic. Patient and healthcare provider views of the effectiveness of telehealth services are encouraging and support the long-term use of telehealth services in clinical practice. Telehealth may provide a strategy that has far-reaching benefits for diverse patient populations, such as patients with Batten disease and other rare diseases, who face additional barriers to accessing subspecialty healthcare services. The aims of this paper, through the experience of a single Batten Disease Center of Excellence, are to (1) review the benefits and barriers involved in the delivery of telehealth services to patients with rare diseases; (2) discuss components of a model for clinical care that utilizes telehealth services for patients with Batten disease; (3) discuss limitations and future directions of using telehealth in patients with rare diseases. Healthcare systems should consider building clinical models that utilize telehealth services to provide multidisciplinary services to patients with rare diseases. There are numerous benefits in using telehealth that can enhance and expand service delivery between the patient and clinician. Telehealth services can also improve provider-to-provider communication and collaboration when providing clinical care to individuals with rare diseases. Although there are many benefits to utilizing telehealth services in provision of care to patients with rare diseases, it is important to consider factors that may limit or add additional barriers prior to implementing telehealth services. There is a need for future collaborative research to examine and compare the effectiveness and outcomes of telehealth services with standard of care services that are provided in-person. Future research should also examine how to reduce the challenges and barriers associated with the implementation of telehealth services.Plain language summary: What is telehealth? Telehealth is defined by the US Department of Health Resources and Services Administrations1 as the "use of electronic information and telecommunication technologies to support long-distance clinical healthcare, patient and professional health-related education, public health, and health administration. Technologies include video conference, the internet, store-and-forward imaging, streaming media, and terrestrial and wireless communication." What was the aim of this review? This review was conducted to guide a clinical model using telehealth services for patients with Batten disease and other rare diseases based on the experiences of a single Batten Disease Center of Excellence. Why is this important? Individuals with rare diseases may face multiple barriers to accessing clinical services. Local doctors and treatment providers, such as speech therapists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, and psychologists, may not have knowledge of rare diseases or how to manage symptoms and disease progression, or how to guide treatment services. Other barriers may also include:• Lack of local resources;• Increased caregiver stress;• Difficulty obtaining a correct diagnosis.There are numerous benefits to using telehealth services for both patients with rare diseases, such as:• Convenience;• Cost savings;• Improved access to care;• Ability to see multiple providers that can help with symptom monitoring, assessment, and treatment services. Where do we go from here? It is important to consider limitations when creating a model for clinical care for patients with rare diseases. Some limitations to think about are:• Clinician and organization familiarity with telehealth;• Reimbursement and coverage from insurance companies for telehealth;• Security and privacy of patient information;• Training of telehealth providers;• Logistical factors, including use of equipment, internet/connectivity, and technical troubleshooting.Future directions should involve collaborative research that studies the effectiveness, feasibility, and perceptions of families of rare diseases and providers that use telehealth for clinical healthcare services. Research should also further study and consider ways to improve barriers and challenges associated with implementing telehealth systems into existing healthcare systems.
    Keywords:  Batten disease; rare disease; telehealth
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1177/26330040211038564
  13. Reprod Biomed Online. 2023 Feb 28. pii: S1472-6483(23)00120-7. [Epub ahead of print]
      RESEARCH QUESTION: How do carriers of pathogenic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) respond to ovarian stimulation?DESIGN: A single-centre, retrospective study conducted between January 2006 and July 2021 in France. Ovarian reserve markers and ovarian stimulation cycle outcomes were compared for couples undergoing preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for maternally inherited mtDNA disease (n = 18) (mtDNA-PGT group) with a matched-control group of patients undergoing PGT for male indications (n = 96). The PGT outcomes for the mtDNA-PGT group and the follow-up of these patients in case of unsuccessful PGT was also reported.
    RESULTS: For carriers of pathogenic mtDNA, parameters of ovarian response to FSH and ovarian stimulation cycle outcomes were not different from those of matched-control ovarian stimulation cycles. The carriers of pathogenic mtDNA needed a longer ovarian stimulation and higher dose of gonadotrophins. Three patients (16.7%) obtained a live birth after the PGT process, and eight patients (44.4%) achieved parenthood through alternative methods: oocyte donation (n = 4), natural conception with prenatal diagnosis (n = 2) and adoption (n = 2).
    CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of women carrying a mtDNA variant who have undergone a PGT for monogenic (single gene defects) procedure. It is one of the possible options to obtain a healthy baby without observing an impairment in ovarian response to stimulation.
    Keywords:  PGT; medical counselling; mitochondria; ovarian stimulation; pregnancy
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.02.010