bims-biprem Biomed News
on Bioprinting for regenerative medicine
Issue of 2025–01–12
nine papers selected by
Seerat Maqsood, University of Teramo



  1. Cureus. 2024 Dec;16(12): e75331
      The field of wound healing faces significant challenges, particularly in the treatment of chronic wounds, which often result in prolonged healing times and complications. Recent advancements in 3D printing technology have provided innovative solutions to these challenges, offering tailored and precise approaches to wound care. This review highlights the role of 3D printing in enhancing wound healing, focusing on its application in creating biocompatible scaffolds, custom wound dressings, and drug delivery systems. By mimicking the extracellular matrix (ECM) and facilitating cell proliferation, 3D-printed biomaterials have the potential to significantly accelerate the healing process. In addition, 3D bioprinting enables the production of functional skin substitutes that can be customized for individual patients. Despite the promise of these technologies, several challenges remain, including the need for improved vascularization, cost concerns, and regulatory hurdles. The future of wound healing lies in the continued integration of 3D printing with emerging technologies such as 4D printing and bioelectronics, providing opportunities for personalized and on-demand therapies. This review explores the current state of 3D printing in wound care, its challenges, and the future potential of these innovative technologies.
    Keywords:  bioprinting; personalized medicine; skin substitutes; tissue engineering; ‎3d printing
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.75331
  2. J Mater Chem B. 2025 Jan 08.
      The significance of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting in the domain of regenerative medicine and tissue engineering is readily apparent. To create a multi-functional bioinspired structure, 3D bioprinting requires high-performance bioinks. Bio-inks refer to substances that encapsulate viable cells and are employed in the printing procedure to construct 3D objects progressive through successive layers. For a bio-ink to be considered high-performance, it must meet several critical criteria: printability, gelation kinetics, structural integrity, elasticity and strength, cell adhesion and differentiation, mimicking the native ECM, cell viability and proliferation. As an exemplar application, tissue grafting is used to repair and replace severely injured tissues. The primary considerations in this case include compatibility, availability, advanced surgical techniques, and potential complications after the operation. 3D printing has emerged as an advancement in 3D culture for its use as a regenerative medicine approach. Thus, additive technologies such as 3D bioprinting may offer safe, compatible, and fast-healing tissue engineering options. Multiple methods have been developed for hard and soft tissue engineering during the past few decades, however there are many limitations. Despite significant advances in 3D cell culture, 3D printing, and material creation, a gold standard strategy for designing and rebuilding bone, cartilage, skin, and other tissues has not yet been achieved. Owing to its abundance in the human body and its critical role in protecting and supporting human tissues, soft and hard collagen-based bioinks is an attractive proposition for 3D bioprinting. Collagen, offers a good combination of biocompatibility, controllability, and cell loading. Collagen made of triple helical collagen subunit is a protein-based organic polymer present in almost every extracellular matrix of tissues. Collagen-based bioinks, which create bioinspired scaffolds with multiple functionalities and uses them in various applications, is a represent a breakthrough in the regenerative medicine and biomedical engineering fields. This protein can be blended with a variety of polymers and inorganic fillers to improve the physical and biological performance of the scaffolds. To date, there has not been a comprehensive review appraising the existing literature surround the use of collagen-based bioink applications in 'soft' or 'hard' tissue applications. The uses of the target region in soft tissues include the skin, nerve, and cartilage, whereas in the hard tissues, it specifically refers to bone. For soft tissue healing, collagen-based bioinks must meet greater functional criteria, whereas hard tissue restoration requires superior mechanical qualities. Herein, we summarise collagen-based bioink's features and highlight the most essential ones for diverse healing situations. We conclude with the primary challenges and difficulties of using collagen-based bioinks and suggest future research objectives.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1039/d4tb01060d
  3. J Nanobiotechnology. 2025 Jan 03. 23(1): 5
      The repair of nerve damage has long posed a challenge owing to limited self-repair capacity and the highly differentiated nature of nerves. While new therapeutic and pharmacologic interventions have emerged in neurology, their regenerative efficacy remains limited. Tissue engineering offers a promising avenue for overcoming the limitations of conventional treatments and increasing the outcomes of regenerative repair. By implanting scaffolds into damaged nerve tissue sites, the repair and functional reconstruction of nerve injuries can be significantly facilitated. The integration of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology introduces a novel approach for accurate simulation and scalably fabricating neural tissue structures. Tissue-engineered scaffolds developed through 3D printing technology are expected to be a viable therapeutic option for nerve injuries, with broad applicability and continued development. This review systematically examines recent advances in 3D printing and tissue engineering for nerve regeneration and repair. It details the basic principles and construction strategies of neural tissue engineering and explores the crucial role of 3D printing technology. Additionally, it elucidates specific applications and technical challenges associated with this integrated approach, thereby providing valuable insights into innovative strategies and pragmatic implementation within this field.
    Keywords:  3D printing; Nerve regeneration; Nerve repair; Tissue engineering
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-024-03052-9
  4. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2024 ;14 49
      The realm of precision medicine, particularly its application within various sectors, shines notably in neuroradiology, where it leverages the advancements of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. This synergy has significantly enhanced surgical planning, fostered the creation of tailor-made medical apparatus, bolstered medical pedagogy, and refined targeted therapeutic delivery. This review delves into the contemporary advancements and applications of 3D printing in neuroradiology, underscoring its pivotal role in refining surgical strategies, augmenting patient outcomes, and diminishing procedural risks. It further articulates the utility of 3D-printed anatomical models for enriched comprehension, simulation, and educational endeavors. In addition, it illuminates the horizon of bespoke medical devices and prosthetics, illustrating their utility in addressing specific cranial and spinal anomalies. This narrative extends to scrutinize how 3D printing underpins precision medicine by offering customized drug delivery mechanisms and therapies tailored to the patient's unique medical blueprint. It navigates through the inherent challenges of 3D printing, including the financial implications, the need for procedural standardization, and the assurance of quality. Prospective trajectories and burgeoning avenues, such as material and technological innovations, the confluence with artificial intelligence, and the broadening scope of 3D printing in neurosurgical applications, are explored. Despite existing hurdles, the fusion of 3D printing with neuroradiology heralds a transformative era in precision medicine, poised to elevate patient care standards and pioneer novel surgical paradigms.
    Keywords:  Anatomical models; Neuroradiology; Precision medicine; Surgical planning; Three-dimensional printing
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_119_2024
  5. Eur Spine J. 2025 Jan 07.
       PURPOSE: The objective of this systematic review is to present a comprehensive summary of existing research on the use of 3D printing in spinal surgery.
    METHODS: The researchers conducted a thorough search of four digital databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase) to identify relevant studies published between January 1999 and December 2022. The review focused on various aspects, including the types of objects printed, clinical applications, clinical outcomes, time and cost considerations, 3D printing materials, location of 3D printing, and technologies utilized. Out of the 1620 studies initially identified and the 17 added by manual search, 105 met the inclusion criteria for this review, collectively involving 2088 patients whose surgeries involved 3D printed objects.
    RESULTS: The studies presented a variety of 3D printed devices, such as anatomical models, intraoperative navigational templates, and customized implants. The most widely used type of objects are drill guides (53%) and anatomical models (25%) which can also be used for simulating the surgery. Custom made implants are much less frequently used (16% of papers). These devices significantly improved clinical outcomes, particularly enhancing the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Most studies (88%) reported reduced operation times, although two noted longer times due to procedural complexities. A variety of 3DP technologies and materials were used, with STL, FDM, and SLS common for models and guides, and titanium for implants via EBM, SLM, and DMLS. Materialise software (Mimics, 3-Matic, Magics) was frequently utilized. While most studies mentioned outsourced production, in-house printing was implied in several cases, indicating a trend towards localized 3D printing in spine surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: 3D printing in spine surgery, a rapidly growing area of research, is predominantly used for creating drill guides for screw insertion, anatomical models, and innovative implants, enhancing clinical outcomes and reducing operative time. While cost-efficiency remains uncertain due to insufficient data, some 3D printing applications, like pedicle screw drill guides, are already widely accepted and routinely used in hospitals.
    Keywords:  3D Printing; 3D Software; Spine surgery
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08594-y
  6. Materials (Basel). 2024 Dec 10. pii: 6045. [Epub ahead of print]17(24):
      Natural composites are emerging as promising alternative materials for 3D printing in biomedical applications due to their biocompatibility, sustainability, and unique mechanical properties. The use of natural composites offers several advantages, including reduced environmental impact, enhanced biodegradability, and improved tissue compatibility. These materials can be processed into filaments or resins suitable for various 3D printing techniques, such as fused deposition modeling (FDM). Natural composites also exhibit inherent antibacterial properties, making them particularly suitable for applications in tissue engineering, drug delivery systems, and biomedical implants. This review explores the potential of utilizing natural composites in additive manufacturing for biomedical purposes, discussing the historical development of 3D printing techniques; the types of manufacturing methods; and the optimization of material compatibility, printability, and mechanical properties to fully realize the potential of using natural fibers in 3D printing for biomedical applications.
    Keywords:  3D printing; additive manufacturing; biomedical applications; natural composites; sustainability
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17246045
  7. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2025 Jan 06.
      Transplantation of bone implants is currently recognized as one of the most effective means of treating bone defects. Biobased and biodegradable polyester composites combine the good mechanical and degradable properties of polyester, thereby providing an alternative for bone implant materials. Bone tissue engineering (BTE) accelerates bone defect repair by simulating the bone microenvironment. Composite scaffolds support bone formation and further accelerate the process of bone repair. The introduction of 3D printing technology enables the preparation of scaffolds to be more precise, reproducible, and flexible, which is a very promising development. This review presents the physical properties of BTE scaffolds and summarizes the strategies adopted by domestic and international scholars to improve the properties of scaffolds based on biobased and biodegradable polyester/ceramic composites in recent years. In addition, future development prospects in the field and the challenges of expanding production in clinical applications are presented.
    Keywords:  3D printing; bone defect regeneration; bone tissue engineering scaffolds; ceramic; functional nanomaterials; polyester
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c15719
  8. Lab Chip. 2025 Jan 08.
      Organs-on-chips (OoCs) have significantly advanced biomedical research by precisely reconstructing human microphysiological systems with biomimetic functions. However, achieving greater structural complexity of cell cultures on-chip for enhanced biological mimicry remains a challenge. To overcome these challenges, 3D bioprinting techniques can be used in directly building complex 3D cultures on chips, facilitating the in vitro engineering of organ-level models. Herein, we review the distinctive features of OoCs, along with the technical and biological challenges associated with replicating complex organ structures. We discuss recent bioprinting innovations that simplify the fabrication of OoCs while increasing their architectural complexity, leading to breakthroughs in the field and enabling the investigation of previously inaccessible biological problems. We highlight the challenges for the development of 3D bioprinted OoCs, concluding with a perspective on future directions aimed at facilitating their clinical translation.
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1039/d4lc00769g
  9. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2025 Jan 07.
      Although 3D printing is becoming a dominant technique for scaffold preparation in bone tissue engineering (TE), developing hydrogel-based ink compositions with bioactive and self-healing properties remains a challenge. This research focuses on developing a bone scaffold based on a composite hydrogel, which maintains its self-healing properties after incorporating bioactive glass and is 3D-printable. The plain hydrogel ink was synthesized using natural polymers of 1 wt % N-carboxyethyl chitosan, 2 wt % hyaluronic acid aldehyde, 0.3 wt % adipic acid hydrazide, and alginate (ALG) (2, 5, and 10 wt %). Bioactive glass (BG) (0 and 5 w/v %) particles were incorporated into the plain matrix to obtain an osteogenic composite hydrogel. The material was characterized via rheology, field emission scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (FESEM/EDS), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), swelling, degradation, bioactivity, and in vitro cellular assessments. Rheological evaluations confirmed that the specimen with 0 w/v % BG and 5 wt % ALG exhibited the highest G', G″, and viscosity values. All specimens exhibited self-healing, provided by two reversible dynamic bonds, namely, imine and acylhydrazone. Bioactivity evaluation by SBF immersion revealed the formation of HA particles on the composite hydrogels. MTT cytotoxicity assay on MG63 indicated that the composite sample containing 5 w/v % BG and 10 wt % ALG had the highest cell viability (95 ± 1.02%) by culture day 3. The developed approach presents a promising hydrogel ink formulation with a high potential for extrusion-based 3D printing of bone TE constructs.
    Keywords:  additive manufacturing; bioactive glass; bone regeneration; polymer hydrogels; self-repairing
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.4c01476