bims-tumhet Biomed News
on Tumor Heterogeneity
Issue of 2023‒12‒17
seven papers selected by
Sergio Marchini, Humanitas Research



  1. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Dec 04. pii: 17095. [Epub ahead of print]24(23):
      High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) patients carrying the BRCA1/2 mutation or deficient in the homologous recombination repair system (HRD) generally benefit from treatment with PARP inhibitors. Some international recommendations suggest that BRCA1/2 genetic testing should be offered for all newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer, along with HRD assessment. Academic tests (ATs) are continuously under development, in order to break down the barriers patients encounter in accessing HRD testing. Two different methods for shallow whole-genome sequencing (sWGS) were compared to the reference assay, Myriad. All these three assays were performed on 20 retrospective HGSOC samples. Moreover, HRD results were correlated with the progression-free survival rate (PFS). Both sWGS chemistries showed good correlation with each other and a complete agreement, even when compared to the Myriad score. Our academic HRD assay categorized patients as HRD-Deficient, HRM-Mild and HRN-Negative. These three groups were matched with PFS, providing interesting findings in terms of HRD scoring and months of survival. Both our sWGS assays and the Myriad test correlated with the patient's response to treatments. Finally, our AT confirms its capability of determining HRD status, with the advantage of being faster, cheaper, and easier to carry out. Our results showed a prognostic value for the HRD score.
    Keywords:  HGSOC; PFS; academic HRD; sWGS
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242317095
  2. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 22. pii: 5525. [Epub ahead of print]15(23):
      Our aim was to evaluate the concordance between the Myriad MyChoice and two alternative homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) assays (AmoyDx HRD Focus NGS Panel and OncoScan™) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Tissue samples from 50 patients with newly diagnosed EOC and known Myriad MyChoice HRD status were included. DNA aliquots from tumor samples, previously evaluated with Myriad MyChoice and centrally reassessed, were distributed to laboratories to assess their HRD status using the two platforms, after being blinded for the Myriad MyChoice CDx HRD status. The primary endpoint was the concordance between Myriad MyChoice and each alternative assay. Tumor samples were evaluated with an AmoyDx® HRD Focus Panel (n = 50) and with OncoScan™ (n = 43). Both platforms provided results for all tumors. Analysis showed that correlation was high for the Myriad MyChoice GI score and AmoyDx® HRD Focus Panel (r = 0.79) or OncoScan™ (r = 0.87) (continuous variable). The overall percent agreement (OPA) between Myriad MyChoice GI status (categorical variable) and each alternative assay was 83.3% (68.6-93.3%) with AmoyDx and 77.5% (61.5-89.2%) with OncoScan™. The OPA in HRD status between Myriad MyChoice and AmoyDx was 88.6% (75.4-96.2). False-positive rates were 31.6% (6/19) for AmoyDx GI status and 31.9% (7/22) for OncoScan™, while false-negative rates were 0% (0/28, AmoyDx) and 11.1% (2/18, OncoScan™) compared with the Myriad MyChoice GI status. While substantial concordance between Myriad MyChoice and alternative assays was demonstrated, prospective validation of the analytical performance and clinical relevance of these assays is warranted.
    Keywords:  biomarker; concordance; enomic instability; epithelial ovarian cancer; homologous recombination deficiency
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15235525
  3. Cells. 2023 Nov 26. pii: 2712. [Epub ahead of print]12(23):
      Chromosomal instability (CIN) is a prevalent characteristic of solid tumours and haematological malignancies. CIN results in an increased frequency of chromosome mis-segregation events, thus yielding numerical and structural copy number alterations, a state also known as aneuploidy. CIN is associated with increased chances of tumour recurrence, metastasis, and acquisition of resistance to therapeutic interventions, and this is a dismal prognosis. In this review, we delve into the interplay between CIN and cancer, with a focus on its impact on the tumour microenvironment-a driving force behind metastasis. We discuss the potential therapeutic avenues that have resulted from these insights and underscore their crucial role in shaping innovative strategies for cancer treatment.
    Keywords:  cancer therapy; chromosomal instability; extracellular matrix; extracellular vesicles; immune modulation; metabolic vulnerabilities; metastasis; tumour microenvironment
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12232712
  4. Cell. 2023 Nov 28. pii: S0092-8674(23)01219-9. [Epub ahead of print]
      RNA sequencing in situ allows for whole-transcriptome characterization at high resolution, while retaining spatial information. These data present an analytical challenge for bioinformatics-how to leverage spatial information effectively? Properties of data with a spatial dimension require special handling, which necessitate a different set of statistical and inferential considerations when compared to non-spatial data. The geographical sciences primarily use spatial data and have developed methods to analye them. Here we discuss the challenges associated with spatial analysis and examine how we can take advantage of practice from the geographical sciences to realize the full potential of spatial information in transcriptomic datasets.
    Keywords:  geography; modifiable areal unit problem; omics; spatial analysis; spatial autocorrelation; spatial data; spatial heterogeneity; spatial transcriptomics
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.11.003
  5. Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Dec 06. pii: S0090-8258(23)01570-6. [Epub ahead of print]180 91-98
      OBJECTIVES: We evaluated usability of single base substitution signature 3 (Sig3) as a biomarker for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC).MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective observational trial includes 165 patients with advanced HGSC. Fresh tissue samples (n = 456) from multiple intra-abdominal areas at diagnosis and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) were collected for whole-genome sequencing. Sig3 was assessed by fitting samples independently with COSMIC v3.2 reference signatures. An HR scar assay was applied for comparison. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were studied using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis.
    RESULTS: Sig3 has a bimodal distribution, eliminating the need for an arbitrary cutoff typical in HR scar tests. Sig3 could be assessed from samples with low (10%) cancer cell proportion and was consistent between multiple samples and stable during NACT. At diagnosis, 74 (45%) patients were HRD (Sig3+), while 91 (55%) were HR proficient (HRP, Sig3-). Sig3+ patients had longer PFS and OS than Sig3- patients (22 vs. 13 months and 51 vs. 34 months respectively, both p < 0.001). Sig3 successfully distinguished the poor prognostic HRP group among BRCAwt patients (PFS 19 months for Sig3+ and 13 months for Sig3- patients, p < 0.001). However, Sig3 at diagnosis did not predict chemoresponse anymore in the first relapse. The patient-level concordance between Sig3 and HR scar assay was 87%, and patients with HRD according to both tests had the longest median PFS.
    CONCLUSIONS: Sig3 is a prognostic marker in advanced HGSC and useful tool in patient stratification for HRD.
    Keywords:  Genetic testing; High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC); Homologous-recombination-deficiency (HRD); Platinum; Whole-genome-sequencing (WGS)
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.11.027
  6. BMC Bioinformatics. 2023 Dec 08. 24(1): 465
      Hierarchical classification offers a more specific categorization of data and breaks down large classification problems into subproblems, providing improved prediction accuracy and predictive power for undefined categories, while also mitigating the impact of poor-quality data. Despite these advantages, its application in predicting primary cancer is rare. To leverage the similarity of cancers and the specificity of methylation patterns among them, we developed the Cancer Hierarchy Classification Tool (CHCT) using the idea of hierarchical classification, with methylation data from 30 cancer types and 8239 methylome samples downloaded from publicly available databases (The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO)). We used unsupervised clustering to divide the classification subproblems and screened differentially methylated sites using Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, Tukey-kramer test, and Boruta algorithms to construct models for each classifier module. After validation, CHCT accurately classified 1568 out of 1660 cases in the test set, with an average accuracy of 94.46%. We further curated an independent validation cohort of 677 cancer samples from GEO and assigned a diagnosis using CHCT, which showed high diagnostic potential with generally high accuracies (an average accuracy of 91.40%). Moreover, CHCT demonstrates predictive capability for additional cancer types beyond its original classifier scope as demonstrated in the medulloblastoma and pituitary tumor datasets. In summary, CHCT can hierarchically classify primary cancer by methylation profile, by splitting a large-scale classification of 30 cancer types into ten smaller classification problems. These results indicate that cancer hierarchical classification has the potential to be an accurate and robust cancer classification method.
    Keywords:  Cancer; Classification; Cluster analysis; Machine learning
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-023-05529-0
  7. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 29. pii: 5633. [Epub ahead of print]15(23):
      Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) can arise from germline or somatic pathogenic variants as well as other genomic damage and epigenetic alterations in the HR repair pathway. Patients with tumors presenting with an HRD phenotype can show sensitivity to Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis). Several promising tests to detect HRD have been developed based on different HRD definitions, biomarkers, and algorithms. However, no consensus on a gold standard HRD test has been established. In this systematic review, a comprehensive list of tests for the detection of HRD was identified and compared regarding HRD definition, biomarkers, and algorithms. PubMed's Medline and Elsevier's Embase were systematically searched, resulting in 27 eligible articles meeting the inclusion criteria. The primary challenge when comparing HRD tests lies in the lack of a consensus definition of HRD, as the HRD definition influences the proportion of samples being classified as HRD and impacts the classification performance. This systematic review provides an overview of available HRD tests that can inspire other researchers in searching for a gold standard HRD definition and highlights the importance of the factors that should be considered when choosing an HRD definition and tests for future planning of clinical trials and studies.
    Keywords:  HRD; algorithm; bioinformatics; cancer; homologous recombination deficiency
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15235633