Genome Med. 2026 Oct 15. pii: 154. [Epub ahead of print]18(1):
BACKGROUND: Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) whole-genome methylation sequencing enables simultaneous characterization of DNA methylation and fragmentomic features for cancer detection. However, it remains unclear whether methylation library preparation faithfully preserves fragmentomic signals, how methylation and fragmentation are biologically coupled, and how these two modalities can be systematically integrated.
METHODS: We systematically evaluated the preservation of cfDNA fragmentomic features in whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) and enzymatic methyl sequencing (EM-seq) relative to conventional whole-genome sequencing (WGS). We next investigated the biological relationship between methylation and fragmentation and delineated methylation haplotype blocks (MHBs) directly from plasma cfDNA as biologically interpretable units for organizing multimodal cfDNA signals. Guided by these findings, we developed multimodal diagnostic models integrating complementary methylation and fragmentomic features.
RESULTS: Canonical cfDNA fragmentomic patterns were partially preserved across methylation sequencing protocols, although the degree of preservation varied among individual features. DNA methylation levels were associated with characteristic fragment length and end-motif patterns. Plasma-derived MHBs exhibited tissue-associated regulatory features and distinct patterns of chromatin accessibility, repeat enrichment, and methylation heterogeneity, providing biologically interpretable units for integrated cfDNA analysis. Within these regions, methylation and fragmentomic signals exhibited coordinated yet complementary patterns. Leveraging this framework, we developed Fragmentomics And Methylation Ensemble (FAME), an interpretable multimodal model integrating MHB-centered methylation and fragmentomic features for cancer detection and tissue-of-origin prediction, and further extended it with complementary genome-wide methylation and fragmentomic features to generate a genome-wide-augmented FAME model (FAME-GW). Across cross-validation, independent validation, and comparisons with THEMIS (THorough Epigenetic Marker Integration Solution), SPOT-MAS (screening for the presence of tumor by methylation and size), and DELFI (DNA evaluation of fragments for early interception), FAME-based models achieved robust diagnostic performance, with FAME providing a compact and interpretable representation and FAME-GW delivering the strongest overall predictive performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that cfDNA whole-genome methylation sequencing partially preserves informative fragmentomic signals and establishes plasma-derived MHBs as biologically interpretable units for organizing and integrating complementary methylation and fragmentomic information. This framework provides insight into the coupling of epigenetic and fragmentomic information and an effective strategy for interpretable cfDNA-based cancer diagnosis.
Keywords: Cancer detection; Cell-free DNA; DNA methylation; Fragmentomics; Liquid biopsy; Methylation haplotype blocks