bims-netuvo Biomed News
on Nerves in tumours of visceral organs
Issue of 2023‒09‒03
four papers selected by
Maksym V. Kopanitsa, The Francis Crick Institute



  1. Asian J Surg. 2023 Aug 28. pii: S1015-9584(23)01269-1. [Epub ahead of print]
      BACKGROUND: The significance of peri-neural invasion (PNI) in resected patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) has been rarely explored. Our study was performed to evaluate the significance of PNI in resected HCCA patients in terms of tumor biological features and long-term survival.METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed surgically-treated HCCA patients between June, 2000 and June 2018. SPSS 25.0 software was used for statistical analysis.
    RESULTS: A total of 239 resected HCCA patients were included (No. PNI: 138). PNI indicated more aggressive tumor biological features. Major vascular reconstruction was more frequently performed in patients with PNI (34.8% vs 24.8%, P = 0.064). Patients with PNI shared a significantly higher percentage of surgical margin width <5 mm (29.0% vs 16.8%, P = 0.02). The proportion of patients with T1-2 disease (31.2% vs 40.6%, P = 0.085) or I-II disease (21% vs 34.7%, P = 0.014) was significantly lower in patients with PNI. The overall morbidity rate was significantly higher in patients with PNI (P = 0.042). A much worse overall survival (OS) (P = 0.0003) or disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.0011) in patients with PNI. Even after matching vital prognostic factors, a significantly worse OS (P = 0.0003) or DFS (P = 0.0002) was still observed in patients with PNI. PNI was an independent prognostic factor in both OS (P = 0.011) and DFS (P = 0.024).
    CONCLUSION: PNI indicated more aggressive tumor biological features and more advanced tumor stage in patients with resected HCCA. PNI can be an independent prognostic factor in both OS and DFS. Future multi-center studies covering various races or populations are required for further validation.
    Keywords:  Hilar cholangiocarcinoma; Peri-neural invasion; Prognosis; Surgery
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.08.110
  2. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2023 Aug 31. e23524
      Breast cancer, as the most prevalent female malignancy, leads the cancer-related death in women worldwide. Local anesthetic chloroprocaine exhibits antitumor potential, but its specific functions and underlying molecular mechanisms in breast cancer remain unclear. Here, we demonstrated chloroprocaine significantly inhibited proliferation, invasion and induced apoptosis of breast cancer cells in vitro. Tumor growth and pulmonary metastasis were also suppressed in BABL/c nude mice model with chloroprocaine treatment. LINC00494 was identified as one of the most downregulated long noncoding RNAs in chloroprocaine-treated breast cancer cells by high-throughput sequencing. Futhermore, high level of LINC00494 was positively associated with poor outcome of breast cancer patients. LINC00494 acted as a "miRNAs sponge" to compete with MED19 for the biding of miR-3619-5p, led to the upregulation of MED19. LINC00494/miR-3619-5p/MED19 axis participated in chloroprocaine-mediated inhibition of proliferation, invasion and promotion of apoptosis of breast cancer cells. Consequently, our finding suggested local anesthetic chloroprocaine attenuated breast cancer aggressiveness through LINC00494-mediated signaling pathway, which detailly revealed the clinical value of chloroprocaine during breast cancer treatment.
    Keywords:  LINC00494; MED19; breast cancer; chloroprocaine; miR-3619-5p
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.23524
  3. Front Pharmacol. 2023 ;14 1227330
      Introduction: Cancer registries and hospital electronic medical records are commonly used to investigate drug repurposing candidates for cancer. However, administrative data are often more accessible than data from cancer registries and medical records. Therefore, we evaluated if administrative data could be used to evaluate drug repurposing for cancer by conducting an example study on the association between beta-blocker use and breast cancer mortality. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of women aged ≥50 years with incident breast cancer was conducted using a linked dataset with statewide hospital admission data and nationwide medication claims data. Women receiving beta blockers and first-line anti-hypertensives prior to and at diagnosis were compared. Breast cancer molecular subtypes and metastasis status were inferred by algorithms from commonly prescribed breast cancer antineoplastics and hospitalization diagnosis codes, respectively. Subdistribution hazard ratios (sHR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for breast cancer mortality were estimated using Fine and Gray's competing risk models adjusted for age, Charlson comorbidity index, congestive heart failure, myocardial infraction, molecular subtype, presence of metastasis at diagnosis, and breast cancer surgery. Results: 2,758 women were hospitalized for incident breast cancer. 604 received beta-blockers and 1,387 received first-line antihypertensives. In total, 154 breast cancer deaths were identified over a median follow-up time of 2.7 years. We found no significant association between use of any beta-blocker and breast-cancer mortality (sHR 0.86, 95%CI 0.58-1.28), or when stratified by beta-blocker type (non-selective, sHR 0.42, 95%CI 0.14-1.25; selective, sHR 0.95, 95%CI 0.63-1.43). Results were not significant when stratified by molecular subtypes (e.g., triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), any beta blocker, sHR 0.16, 95%CI 0.02-1.51). Discussion: It is possible to use administrative data to explore drug repurposing opportunities. Although non-significant, an indication of an association was found for the TNBC subtype, which aligns with previous studies using registry data. Future studies with larger sample size, longer follow-up are required to confirm the association, and linkage to clinical data sources are required to validate our methodologies.
    Keywords:  administrative healthcare data; beta-blocker; breast cancer; cancer mortality; cancer survival; drug repurposing; real-world data
    DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1227330